Shockwave lithotripsy and endourological stone treatment in children

Urological Research - Tập 34 - Trang 112-117 - 2006
Sven Lahme1
1Department of Urology, St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim, Germany

Tóm tắt

Urolithiasis in children is a rare disease in developed countries. Due to the particular anatomical conditions of the infant body, indications and results of the well-known treatment modalities, such as shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy and PCNL, have to be determined. Experience in active stone treatment in children is very rare and only a limited number of papers are available. SWL can be performed only if focus size and treatment facilities are adapted to the size of the child. Miniaturization of ureteroscopes allows primary access to the infant upper urinary tract. Results, complications and morbidity of the treatment are similar to the results in adults. The main prerequisite for the primary endoscopic approach is the experience of the surgeon. PCNL should be performed as Mini-Perc. Percutaneous procedures show equal results and morbidity compared to the treatment of adults, in experienced hands. As two-thirds of infant stone patients have an underlying metabolic disorder, close cooperation of adult and pediatric urologists, nephrologists and radiologists is necessary in order to achieve good results in the treatment of infant stones.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Kuvdecic H, Tucak A, Peric N, Prlic D, Zoric I, Galic R (2003) ESWL treatment of urinary stones in children—the overview of 14 years of experience. Coll Antropol 27:71–75 Ather MH, Noor MA, Akhtar S (2004) The effect of intracalyceal distribution on the clearance of renal stones of > or =20 mm in children after extracorporeal lithotripsy. BJU Int 93:827–829 Al Bousaidy SS, Prem AR, Medhat M (2003) Pediatric staghorn calculi: the role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with special reference to ureteral stenting. J Urol 169:629–633 Ozgür Tan M, Karaoglan U, Sen I, Deniz N, Bozkirli I (2003) The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients. Eur Urol 43:188–193 Afshar K, McLorie G, Papanikolaou F, Malek R, Harvey E, Pippi-Salle JL, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, Farhat W (2004) Outcome of small residual stone fragments following shock wave lithotripsy in children. J Urol 172:1600–1603 Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain Z, Hashmi A, Hussain M, Zafar MN, Sultan S, Mehdi H (2003) Management of pediatric urolithiasis in Pakistan: experience with 1440 children. J Urol 169:634–637 Vlajkovic M, Slavkovic A, Radovanovic M, Siric Z, Stefanovic V, Perovic S (2002) Long-term functional outcome of kidneys in children with urolithiasis after ESWL treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12(2):118–123 Tan AH, Al-Omar M, Denstedt JD, Razvi H (2005) Ureteroscopy for pediatric urolithiasis: an evolving first-line therapy. Urology 65:153–156 Raza A, Smith G, Moussa S, Tolley D (2005) Ureteroscopy in the management of pediatric urinary tract calculi. J Endourol 19:151–158 De Dominicis M, Matarazzo E, Capozza N, Collura G, Caione P (2005) Retrograde ureteroscopy for distal ureteric stone removal in children. BJU Int 95:1049–1052 Dogan HS, Tekgul S, Akdogan B, Keskin MS, Sahin A (2004) Use of the holmium:YAG laser for ureterolithotripsy in children. BJU Int 94:131–133 Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Götz T (2001) Minimal invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40:619–624 Salah MA, Tallai B, Holman E, Khan MA, Toth G, Toth C (2005) Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. BJU Int 95:137–139 Dawaba MS, Shokeir AA, Hafez AT, Shoma AM, El-sherbiny MT, Mokhtar A, Eraky I, El-Kenawy M, El-Kappany HA (2004) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: early and late anatomical and functional results. J Urol 172:1078–1081 Zargooshi J (2001) Open stone surgery in children: is it justified in the era of minimally invasive therapies? BJU Int 88:928–931