Shipping operations support in the “High North”: examining availability of icebreakers along the Northern Sea Route

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 17 Số 2 - Trang 129-147 - 2018
Dimitrios Dalaklis1, Megan Drewniak1, Jens-Uwe Schröder-Hinrichs1
1World Maritime University (WMU), Malmö, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Abstract A rather significant number of business entities already operate within (or, have considered to exploit) the Arctic region, focusing upon previously untapped resources such as precious minerals and large quantities of oil and gas; touristic and fishing activities are clearly on the rise, with various endeavors of maritime transport also being put forward. Up until recently, harsh year-long environmental conditions have significantly hindered the necessary access and transport connections in the Arctic. Even in the case that weather conditions did permit vessels’ passage, unreliable navigational aids and lack of infrastructure/support provided obstacles difficult to overcome. However, environmental data recorded during the last couple of decades clearly indicates that there is a continuous decline of ice coverage in the “High North.” Given this steady decline, the Arctic has now been viewed as a promising field for economic activities and is considered as a potential connecting corridor between Asia and Europe/America (and vice-versa). As human presence and operations are expected to intensify there, it is of utmost importance to evaluate the current level of support towards ships that will be crossing the region; capabilities in relation to search and rescue (SAR) operations and oil spill response are also important. The analysis in hand will first deliver a discussion of the so-called Arctic Passages. While various different maritime routes have been proposed in relation to the Arctic, the most promising one, the Northern Sea Route (NSR), will provide the epicenter of discussion. Through an extensive literature review that includes numerous internet resources, the current analysis will identify the numbers of icebreakers already operating in the NSR, as well as those that will be commissioned into service in the near future. The choice to research the specific type of vessels is supported by a simple argument: icebreakers currently are and will continue to be in the foreseeable future the main “tool” to support shipping activities in the Arctic. Furthermore, emergency management capabilities in the Russian Arctic will be examined to include the current state of rescue coordination centres along with the availability of SAR assets. Additionally, the efforts thus far by the Arctic Council to increase coordination and interaction among the States involved in Arctic affairs will be summarized; the latter will be achieved via a brief review of a very important legally binding agreement: the “search and rescue” instrument. In conclusion, the Russian State has already heavily invested in icebreakers’ building and their current number is fully capable to handle the present level of limited traffic. On the other hand, ships are currently faced with long distances to cross (often without adequate support) adverse environmental conditions, unpredictable hurdles, and slow response times in case of an emergency. Therefore, in case ships operating in the region are increased, it will be difficult to deal with all the additional demands for support. Of particular interest is the fact that considering the vast area of the NSR, the overall available response capabilities in the region under discussion are rather thin; any further increase of maritime traffic in the “High North” must be balanced with additional strengthening of emergency management capabilities. In any case, should the NSR become fully integrated in the global maritime transport system, Russia’s geopolitical status will be clearly improved and further research is needed to discuss the implications both at the regional and global levels.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arctic Council (2009) Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report, available online: www.pmel.noaa.gov/arctic-zone/detect/documents/AMSA_2009_Report_2nd_print.pdf

Barnhart KR, Miller CR, Overeem I, Kay JE (2015) Mapping the future expansion of Arctic open water. Nat Clim Chang 6:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2848

Bennett MM (2014) North by Northeast: toward an Asian-Arctic region, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15387216.2014.936480

Borsch OJ, Andreassen N, Marchenko N, Ingimundarson V, Gunnarsdottir H, Ludin L, Petrov S, Jacobsen U, and Dali BI (2016) Maritime activity in the High North–current and estimated level up to 2025. MARPART Project Report 1, Nord Universitet, Bodo, 2016

Cariou P, Faury O (2015) Relevance of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) for bulk shipping. Transp Res A 78:337–346

Climate NASA (2016) Climate trends continue to break records, available online: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/climate-trends-continue-to-break-records

Dalaklis D, Baxevani E (2016) Arctic in the global warming phenomenon era: new maritime routes and geopolitical tensions. In: Delfour-Samama d'O, Leboeuf C, de Gwenaele P-M (eds) New maritime routes: origins, evolution and prospects. A. Pedone, Paris

Dalaklis D, Baxevani E (2017) Maritime routes in the Arctic: examining the level of traffic and port capabilities along the Northern Sea Route. In: Chircop A, Coffen-Smout S, McConnell M (eds) Oceans’ Yearbook 31. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 06–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004347137_006

Dalaklis D and Drewniak M (2017) The Arctic region: mapping the current state of icebreakers & identifying future trends, (presentation) Maritime Search & Rescue 2017 conference, Helsinki-Finland, 24 May 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19287.88481

Dalaklis D, Baxevani E and Siousiouras P (2016) The future of Arctic shipping business and the positive influence of the Polar Code, International Association of Maritime Economists 2016 Conference, Hamburg-Germany, August 24, 2016

Deboer S (2017) Arctic security and legal issues in the 21st century: an interview with CDR Fahey, available online: http://cimsec.org/arctic-security-legal-issues-21st-century-interview-cdr-sean-fahey/31016

Dewitz J, Dalaklis D, Olcer A, and Balini F (2015) Arctic LNG: exploring the benefits of alternative fuels to mitigate environmental impact risks, presentation in the conference: ShipArc 2015: Safe and Sustainable Shipping in a Changing Arctic Environment (World Maritime University), Malmo, Sweden

Domonoske C (2016) Russia launches world’s biggest, most powerful icebreaker, available online: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/16/482288188/russia-launches-worlds-biggest-most-powerful-icebreaker

Drewniak M, Dalaklis D (2018) Expansion of business activities in the Arctic: the issue of search and rescue services. In: Chircop A, Coffen-Smout S, McConnell M (eds) Ocean Yearbook 32. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden

Drewniak M, Dalaklis D, Kitada M, Ölçer A and Ballini F (2017) Geopolitical considerations of shipping operations in the Arctic: mapping the current state of icebreakers and identifying future needs, International Association of Maritime Economists 2017 Conference, Kyoto-Japan, June 27–30, 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17458.09921

Eger KM (2010) Canadian ports on the Northwest Passage, CHNL, available online: <http://www.arctis-search.com/Canadian+Ports+on+the+Northwest+Passage>

Eguíluz VM, Fernández-Gracia J, Irigoien X, Duarte CM (2016) A quantitative assessment of Arctic shipping in 2010–2014. Sci Rep 6:30,682 available online: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep30682

Farré AB, Stephenson SR, Chen L, Czub M, Dai Y, Demchev D, Efimov Y, Graczyk P, Grythe H, Keil K, Kivekäs N, Kumar N, Liu N, Matelenok I, Myksvoll M, O'Leary D, Olsen J, Sachin Pavithran AP, Petersen E, Raspotnik A, Ryzhov I, Solski J, Suo L, Troein C, Valeeva V, van Rijckevorsel J, Wighting J (2014) Commercial Arctic shipping through the Northeast Passage: routes, resources, governance, technology, and infrastructure. Polar Geogr 37:4, 298–4, 324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2014.965769

Funkdec McK (2014) The Wreck of the Kulluk. The New York Times, available online: http://nytimes.com/2015/01/04/magazine/the-wreck-of-the-kulluk.html?emc=edit_tnt_20141230&nlid=64813105&tntemail0=y&_r=0

Hansen Ø, Grønsedt P, Graversen L and Hendriksen C (2016) Arctic shipping—commercial opportunities and challenges, available online: http://www.cbs.dk/en/knowledge-society/business-in-society/cbs-maritime/downloads

Hodges P (2015) Study: Arctic Sea ice too thick for icebreakers, available online: http://lastresistance.com/study-arctic-sea-ice-too-thick-for-icebreakers/

Kronbak J, Liu M (2010) The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe. J Transp Geogr 18(3):434–444

Marsh WM, Kaufman MM (2012) Physical geography: great systems and global environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Moe A (2014) The Northern Sea Route: smooth sailing ahead? Strateg Anal 38(6):784–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2014.952940

Nilsen T (2016) Announces tender for fantasy giant icebreakers, available online: https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic/2016/09/announces-tender-fantasy-giant-icebreakers

Northern Sea Route Information Office (2017) available online: http://www.arctic-lio.com/nsr_transits

NSIDC, National Snow and Ice Data Center (2017) Low sea ice extent continues in both poles. January 5, 2017, available online: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2017/01/

Østreng W (2010) The northeast passage and northern sea route, available online: http://www.arctis-search.com/The+Northeast+Passage+and+Northern+Sea+Route+2

Overland JE, Wang M (2013) When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? Geophys Res Lett 40:2097–2101. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50316

Pettersen T (2011) Russia to have ten Arctic rescue centers by 2015, Barents Observer, 18.11.2011. http://barentsobserver.com/en/topics/russia-have-ten-arctic-rescue-centers-2015. Accessed 8 Aug 2014

Pettersen T (2016) Proposes center for supply and logistics in the Arctic, available online: http://www.thebarentsobserver.com/arctic/2016/03/proposes-center-supply-and-logistics-arctic

Richter-Menge J, Overland JE and Mathis JT (2016) Arctic Report Card 2016, available online: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card

Shaw J (2016) Icebreakers—expanding the world’s fleet, Volume 32, No 02, available online: http://www.pacmar.com/story/2016/02/01/features/icebreakers-expanding-the-worlds-fleet/408.html

Staalesen A (2016) Government outlines Arctic priority zones, available online: http://www.thebarentsobserver.com/arctic/2016/03/government-outlines-arctic-priority-zones

Stephenson SR, Smith LC (2015) Influence of climate model variability on projected Arctic shipping futures. Earth's Future 3:331–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EF000317

U.S. Department of State–International Security Advisory Board (2016) Report on Arctic policy, available online: https://state.gov/documents/organization/262585.pdf

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2016) Review of maritime transport, (Series). available online: http://unctad.org/en/pages/publications/Review-of-Maritime-Transport-(Series).aspx

Wilson KJ, Falkingham J, Melling H, and De Abreu R (2004) Shipping in the Canadian Arctic—other possible climate change scenarios, available online: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/arctic-zone/detect/human-access-canada.shtml

www.marinelink.com/news/icebreaking-carrier426018#.WTVvqBZ3j-w.linkedin

www.total.com/en/energy-expertise/projects/oil-gas/lng/yamal-lng-cold-environment-gas

Your Subsea News (2017) Fincantieri: Kronprins Haakon launched in Muggiano, available online: http://www.yoursubseanews.com/fincantieri%3A+%E2%80%9Ckronprins+haakon%E2%80%9D+launched+in+muggiano_140421.html