Shell noun phrases in scientific writing: A diachronic corpus-based study on research articles in chemical engineering

Aktas, 2008, Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 3, 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002 Armstrong, 2008 Atkinson, 1996, The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis, Language in Society, 25, 333, 10.1017/S0047404500019205 Atkinson, 1998 Batterham, 2003, Ten years of sustainability: Where do we go from here?, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81, 283, 10.1205/095758203770224324 Bazerman, 1988 Becher, 2001 Beins, 2012 Benitez-Castro, 2015, Coming to grips with shell-nounhood: A critical review of insights into the meaning, function and form of fhell-noun phrases, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35, 168, 10.1080/07268602.2015.1005001 Benitez-Castro, 2021, Shell-noun use in disciplinary student writing: A multifaceted analysis of problem and way in third-year undergraduate writing across three disciplines, English for Specific Purposes, 61, 132, 10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.004 Benitez-Castro, 2015, Shell-nounhood in academic discourse: A critical state-of-the-art review, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20, 378, 10.1075/ijcl.20.3.05ben Berkenkotter, 2016 Bhatia, 2004 Biber, 2011, Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use, English Language and Linguistics, 15, 223, 10.1017/S1360674311000025 Biber, 2016 Brezina, 2018 Byrne, 2009, Chemical engineering in an unsustainable world: Obligations and opportunities, Education for Chemical Engineers, 4, 51, 10.1016/j.ece.2009.09.001 Charles, 2003, ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 313, 10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00048-1 Charles, 2007, Argument or evidence? Disciplinary variation in the use of the Noun that pattern in stance construction, English for Specific Purposes, 26, 203, 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004 Chen, 2020, Surprise markers in applied linguistics research articles: A diachronic perspective, Lingua, 248, 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102992 Costa, 2006, Chemical product engineering: An emerging paradigm within chemical engineering, AIChE Journal, 52, 1976, 10.1002/aic.10880 Fahnestock, 1998, Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts, Written Communication, 15, 330, 10.1177/0741088398015003006 Fairclough, 2010 Favre, 2008, Trends in chemical engineering education: Process, product and sustainable chemical engineering challenges, Education for Chemical Engineers, 3, e22, 10.1016/j.ece.2007.12.002 Flowerdew, 2009, Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus, 85 Flowerdew, 2015 Francis, 1986 Francis, 2002, Labelling discourse: An aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion, 83 Francis, 1998 Grossmann, 2004, Challenges in the new millennium: Product discovery and design, enterprise and supply chain optimization, global life cycle assessment, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 29, 29, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.07.016 Halliday, 2004 Halliday, 1976 Halliday, 2014 Hill, 2009, Chemical product engineering - the third paradigm, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33, 947, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.11.013 Hood, 2011, Writing discipline: Comparing inscriptions of knowledge and knowers in academic writing, 106 Hundt, 1999, "Agile" and "uptight" genres, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4, 221, 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun Hunston, 2000 Hu, 2022, Effects of explicit instruction in nominalisation on ESL learners' academic writing, Iberica, 43, 27, 10.17398/2340-2784.43.27 Hyland, 1999, Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary Knowledge, Applied Linguistics, 20, 341, 10.1093/applin/20.3.341 Hyland, 2002, Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing, 125 Hyland, 2016, Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance, Written Communication, 33, 251, 10.1177/0741088316650399 Hyland, 2016, “We must conclude that…”: A diachronic study of academic engagement, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29, 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003 Hyland, 2017, Is academic writing becoming more informal?, English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40, 10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001 Hyland, 2018, Changing patterns of self-citation: Cumulative inquiry or self-promotion?, Text & Talk, 38, 365, 10.1515/text-2018-0004 Hyland, 2018, “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse, English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18, 10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001 Hyland, 2019 Ivanič, 1991, Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open- and closed-system characteristics, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29, 93, 10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93 Jiang, 2015, Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students' writing, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 90, 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.002 Jiang, 2017 Jiang, 2015, 'The fact that': Stance nouns in disciplinary writing, Discourse Studies, 17, 529, 10.1177/1461445615590719 Jiang, 2018, Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse, Applied Linguistics, 39, 508 Jiang, 2021, ‘The goal of this analysis …’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing, Lingua, 252, 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017 Junnier, 2020, Finding voice in biology: A diachronic analysis of self-mention in the discussions of an L2 scholar, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100889 Kilgarriff, 2014, The Sketch engine: Ten years on, Lexicography, 1, 7, 10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 Latour, 1986 Li, 2021, Authorial presence in research article abstracts: A diachronic investigation of the use of first person pronouns, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100977 Liu, 2017, A genre-based study of shell-noun use in the N-be-that construction in popular and professional science articles, English for Specific Purposes, 48, 32, 10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.002 Mahlberg, 2005 Martin, 2005 McEnery, 2012 Mitchell, 2000, Integrating sustainability in chemical engineering practice and education, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78, 237, 10.1205/095758200530754 1988 Plonsky, 2014, How big is “big? Interpreting effect size in L2 research”, Language Learning, 64, 878, 10.1111/lang.12079 Poole, 2019, Epistemic stance and the construction of knowledge in science writing: A diachronic corpus study, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100784 Rugarcia, 2000, The future of engineering education: Part 1. A vision for a new century, Chemical Engineering Education, 34, 16 Salager-Meyer, 1999, Contentiousness in written medical English discourse: A diachronic study (1810–1995), Text & Talk, 19 Schmid, 2000 Thompson, 2019 Varma, 2014, Evolving trends in chemical engineering education, AIChE Journal, 60, 3692, 10.1002/aic.14613 Wang, 2022, What surprises, interests and confuses researchers?: A frame-based analysis of knowledge emotion markers in research articles, Lingua, 279, 10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103426 Wei, 1996, A century of changing paradigms in chemical engineering, Chemical Technology, 26, 16 Wen, 2022, Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years, Applied Linguistics, 43, 340, 10.1093/applin/amab037 Winter, 1992, The notion of unspecific vs. specific as one way of analysing the information of a fund-raising letter, 131 Winter, 2020 Woinaroschy, 2016, A paradigm-based evolution of chemical engineering, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 24, 553, 10.1016/j.cjche.2016.01.019