Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Hành vi sức khỏe tình dục và thực hành thông báo đối tác liên quan đến các bệnh lây truyền qua đường tình dục ở người trẻ tuổi tại Ireland
Tóm tắt
Các bệnh lây truyền qua đường tình dục (STIs) tạo gánh nặng cho cá nhân và cộng đồng, trong khi tỷ lệ mắc bệnh ở người trẻ tuổi đã tăng liên tục trong những năm gần đây. Thông báo đối tác là một chiến lược y tế công cộng hiệu quả có thể hạn chế sự lây lan của STIs. Nghiên cứu này nhằm khám phá các hành vi sức khỏe tình dục của thanh niên, thái độ đối với việc xét nghiệm STI và cảm giác khi đến thăm một phòng khám sức khỏe tình dục. Nghiên cứu cũng nhằm điều tra sở thích thông báo đối tác và vai trò của khả năng tự hiệu quả trong ý định của người dân thông báo cho đối tác về STIs, bao gồm cả virus gây suy giảm miễn dịch ở người (HIV). Thiết kế nghiên cứu áp dụng là thiết kế nghiên cứu định lượng cắt ngang. Người tham gia là 400 người trưởng thành từ 18 đến 34 tuổi (M = 23 tuổi; SD = 4.27), được tuyển chọn từ Cộng hòa Ireland. Hơn một nửa số người tham gia cho biết chưa bao giờ được xét nghiệm STIs. Những người trẻ tuổi này đặt ít tầm quan trọng hơn vào việc xét nghiệm STIs định kỳ và xét nghiệm sau khi có quan hệ tình dục không an toàn so với những người có xét nghiệm STIs. Khả năng tự hiệu quả có liên quan đáng kể đến ý định thông báo cho đối tác về STIs, bao gồm cả HIV. Khi STIs ngày càng gia tăng ở người trưởng thành trẻ tuổi, điều quan trọng là cần hiểu sâu hơn về các can thiệp được sử dụng để phá vỡ chuỗi lây truyền và cách mà các niềm tin và thái độ khác nhau có thể ảnh hưởng đến chúng. Khả năng tự hiệu quả là yếu tố chính trong ý định thông báo đối tác, cho thấy rằng niềm tin vào khả năng hoặc kỹ năng của một người để thực hiện hành vi sức khỏe tình dục có liên quan tích cực đến ý định thực hiện hành vi đó.
Từ khóa
#bệnh lây truyền qua đường tình dục #sức khỏe tình dục #thông báo đối tác #khả năng tự hiệu quả #người trẻ tuổiTài liệu tham khảo
World Health Organisation (2018) Report on global sexually transmitted infection surveillance, 2018. Switzerland. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565691
World Health Organisation (2020) Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) key facts.
Cronin M, Domegan L (2003) Incidence of STIs continues to rise in the Republic of Ireland. Weekly releases (1997–2007) 7:2310. https://doi.org/10.2807/esw.07.42.02310-en
Irvine N, Doherty L (2005) Sexually transmitted infections on the rise in Northern Ireland. Weekly releases (1997–2007) 10:2636. https://doi.org/10.2807/esw.10.05.02636-en
Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E et al (2013) Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 40:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53
Health Protection Surveillance Centre (2019) Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among young people in Ireland, 2018. Dublin
Lally K, Nathan VY, Dunne S et al (2015) Awareness of sexually transmitted infection and protection methods among university students in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 184:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1073-8
Bjekić M, Vlajinac HD (2017) Partner notification for gonorrhea and syphilis in Belgrade. Serb. J. Dermatol. Venerol 9:43–48
Mathews C, Kalichman MO, Laubscher R et al (2018) Sexual relationships, intimate partner violence and STI partner notification in Cape Town, South Africa: an observational study. Sex Transm Infect 94:144. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2017-053434
Fortenberry JD, Brizendine EJ, Katz BP, Orr DP (2002) The role of self-efficacy and relationship quality in partner notification by adolescents with sexually transmitted infections. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156:1133–1137. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.11.1133
Alam N, Streatfield PK, Khan SI et al (2010) Factors associated with partner referral among patients with sexually transmitted infections in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 71:1921–1926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.009
Nuwaha F, Faxelid E, Wabwire-Mangen F et al (2001) Psycho-social determinants for sexual partner referral in Uganda: quantitative results. Soc Sci Med 53:1287–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00410-x
Leganger A, Kraft P, R⊘ysamb E (2000) Perceived self-efficacy in health behaviour research: conceptualisation, measurement and correlates. Psychol Health 15:51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400288
Tseng MF, Huang CC, Tsai SC et al (2022) Promotion of smoking cessation using the transtheoretical model: short-term and long-term effectiveness for workers in coastal central Taiwan. Tob Use Insights 15:1179173X221104410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221104410
O’Leary A, Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB (2008) Mediation analysis of an effective sexual risk-reduction intervention for women: the importance of self-efficacy. Health Psychol 27:S180-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S180
Schwartz RM, Malka ES, Augenbraun M et al (2006) Predictors of partner notification for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae: an examination of social cognitive and psychological factors. J Urban Health 83:1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9087-9
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2013) Public health benefits of partner notification for sexually transmitted infections and HIV. ECDC, Stockholm. https://doi.org/10.2900/85700
McClean H, Radcliffe K, Sullivan A, Ahmed-Jushuf I (2013) 2012 BASHH statement on partner notification for sexually transmissible infections. Int J STD AIDS 24:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462412472804
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) Partner services for HIV and STDs: a guide for health care providers. Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Davoren MP, Hayes K, Horgan M, Shiely F (2014) Sexually transmitted infection incidence among adolescents in Ireland. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 40:276–282. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100596
Arthur G, Lowndes CM, Blackham J, Fenton KA (2005) Divergent approaches to partner notification for sexually transmitted infections across the European Union. Sex Transm Dis 32:734–741. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000175376.62297.73
Bull L, Apea V, Wiggins H et al (2021) BASHH 2018 UK national audit of HIV partner notification. Int J STD AIDS 32:872–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462421990281
Shepherd L, Harwood H (2017) The role of STI-related attitudes on screening attendance in young adults. Psychol Health Med 22:753–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2016.1234715
Pleasure ZH, Lindberg LD, Mueller J, Frost JJ (2022) Patterns in receipt and source of STI testing among young people in the United States, 2013–2019. J Adolesc Health 71:642–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.04.014
Booth AR, Harris PR, Goyder E, Norman P (2013) Beliefs about chlamydia testing amongst young people living in relatively deprived areas. J Public Health (Oxf) 35:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds082
Cragg A, Steenbeek A, Asbridge M et al (2016) Sexually transmitted infection testing among heterosexual Maritime Canadian university students engaging in different levels of sexual risk taking. Can J Public Health 107:e149–e154. https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.107.5036
Health Protection Surveillance Centre (2022) Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Ireland: trends to the end of 2021. Health Service Exective, Dublin
Health Protection Surveillance Centre (2021) Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Ireland: trends to the end of 2020. Health Service Exective, Dublin
Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Dolezal C et al (2019) Low sexually transmissible infection knowledge, risk perception and concern about infection among men who have sex with men and transgender women at high risk of infection. Sex Health 16:580–586. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh18238
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211
Gan J, Kularadhan V, Chow EPF et al (2021) What do young people in high-income countries want from STI testing services? A systematic review. Sex Transm Infect 97:574–583. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055044
Kowalczyk Mullins TL, Braverman PK, Dorn LD et al (2010) Adolescent preferences for human immunodeficiency virus testing methods and impact of rapid tests on receipt of results. J Adolesc Health 46:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.015
Balfe M, Brugha R, O’Connell E et al (2010) Where do young Irish women want chlamydia-screening services to be set up? A qualitative study employing Goffman’s impression management framework. Health Place 16:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.07.003
Balfe M, Brugha R (2010) Disclosure of STI testing activities by young adults: the influence of emotions and social networks. Sociol Health Illn 32:1041–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01281.x
Lorimer K, Reid ME, Hart GJ (2009) “It has to speak to people’s everyday life”: qualitative study of men and women’s willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to Chlamydia trachomatis screening. Sex Transm Infect 85:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.031138
Dixon-Woods M, Stokes T, Young B et al (2001) Choosing and using services for sexual health: a qualitative study of women’s views. Sex Transm Infect 77:335–339
Royer HR, Zahner SJ (2009) Providers’ experiences with young people’s cognitive representations and emotions related to the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections. Public Health Nurs 26:161–172
McCaffery K, Waller J, Nazroo J, Wardle J (2006) Social and psychological impact of HPV testing in cervical screening: a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect 82:169–174
Foreman M, Ní Rathaille N (2016) Not just another long term chronic illness — social work and HIV in Ireland. Practice 28:97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2015.1087494
Zimmermann HM, van Bilsen WP, Boyd A et al (2021) Prevention challenges with current perceptions of HIV burden among HIV-negative and never-tested men who have sex with men in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study. J Int AIDS Soc 24:e25715
O'Connell CM, Ferone ME (2016) Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Microb Cell 3:390–403. https://doi.org/10.15698/mic2016.09.525
Mokgatle MM, Madiba S, Cele L (2021) A comparative analysis of risky sexual behaviors, self-reported sexually transmitted infections, knowledge of symptoms and partner notification practices among male and female university students in Pretoria, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115660
Hansman E, Wynn A, Moshashane N et al (2021) Experiences and preferences with sexually transmitted infection care and partner notification in Gaborone, Botswana. Int J STD AIDS 32:1250–1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624211033231
Niland R, Nearchou F (2020) Self-efficacy and outcome beliefs as predictors of intentions to notify partners for sexually transmitted infections in Ireland. Int J Health Promot Educ 58:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2019.1671890
Gursahaney PR, Jeong K, Dixon BW, Wiesenfeld HC (2011) Partner notification of sexually transmitted diseases: practices and preferences. Sex Transm Dis 38:821–827. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31821c390b
Fauk NK, Hawke K, Mwanri L, Ward PR (2021) Stigma and discrimination towards people living with HIV in the context of families, communities, and healthcare settings: a qualitative study in Indonesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105424
dos Santos MML, Kruger P, Mellors SE et al (2014) An exploratory survey measuring stigma and discrimination experienced by people living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa: the people living with HIV Stigma Index. BMC Public Health 14:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-80
Nachega JB, Morroni C, Zuniga JM et al (2012) HIV-related stigma, isolation, discrimination, and serostatus disclosure: a global survey of 2035 HIV-infected adults. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care 11:172–178
Izaguirre V, Delcan J (2020) Safety match. Los Angeles