Service quality evaluation for urban rail transfer facilities with Rasch analysis

Travel Behaviour and Society - Tập 13 - Trang 26-35 - 2018
Junghwa Kim1, Jan-Dirk Schmöcker1, Jeong Whon Yu2, Jung Yoon Choi2
1Department of Urban Management, Kyoto University, Japan.
2Department of Engineering, Ajou University, Republic of Korea

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bond, 2001 Carvalho, 2012, Application of the Rasch model in measuring personality disorders, Trends Psychiatry Psychother., 34, 101, 10.1590/S2237-60892012000200009 Cheng, 2011, Evaluating web site service quality in public transport: Evidence from Taiwan High Speed Rail, Transp. Res. Part, 19, 957, 10.1016/j.trc.2011.04.003 Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS), 1997. Transfer Penalties in Urban Mode Choice Modeling, Report prepared for the Travel Model Improvement Program, FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Duncan, 2003, Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 84, 950, 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2 Eboli, 2011, A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view, Transp. Policy, 18, 172, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007 Engelhard, 2013 Embreston, 2000 Fischl, 2007, Development and Rasch analysis of the assessment of computer-related skills, Scand. J. Occup. Ther., 14, 126, 10.1080/11038120600840192 Fruin, 1971 Guo, 2011, Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: a case study of the London Underground, Transp. Res. Part A, 45, 91 Haans, A., 2013. Performing Reasch model tests with Winsteps. Pre-Conference Workshop on “Rasch Scales: Basics – Rationale & Practice” 21-22 September 2013 at Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg. Hawthorne, 2008, Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis, Quality Life of Res., 17, 1183, 10.1007/s11136-008-9395-5 Hensher, 2003, Service quality—developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts, Transp. Res. Part A, 37, 499 Hu, 2006, Passengers’ perceived service quality of city buses in Taipei: scale development and measurement, Transp. Rev., 26, 645, 10.1080/01441640600679482 Hine, 2000, Seamless, accessible travel: users’ views of the public transport journey and interchange, Transp. Policy, 7, 217, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00022-6 Horowitz, 1995, Generic objectives for evaluation of intermodal passenger transfer facilities, Transp. Res. Rec., 1503, 104 Iseki, H., Miller, M., Ringler, A., Smart, M., Taylor, B.D., 2007. Evaluating Connectivity Performance at Transit Transfer Facilities, Under Contract 65A0194 for Project Tool Development to Evaluate the Performance of Intermodal Connectivity (EPIC) to Improve Public Transportation, Sacramento, USA. Jackson, 2002, Validation of authentic performance assessment: a process suited for Rasch modeling, Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 66, 233 Jang, 2010, A study on LOS of pedestrian facility in transfer stations at urban railroad, Korean Soc. Railway, 13, 339 Kang, 2015, An integrated model to evaluate the level of service of urban tail transfer facilities in consistent with user perception, J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 11, 1201 Kim, 2008, The development and application of the service evaluation indicators of transfer facilities in the high-speed railway stations, Korean Soc. Civ. Eng., 28, 533 Kim, 2012, A study on the LOS for station according to transfer distance, Proc. Korean Soc. Railway, 1528 Land, L., Foreman, C., 2001. Neighborhood Intermodal Transfer Facilities, Report Number NCTR-392-16, Research & Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation and University of South Florida, Center for Urban Transportation Research, National Center for Transit Research, Tampa, Florida. Liou, 2014, Improving transportation service quality based on information fusion, Transp. Res. Part A, 67, 225 Lois, D., Monzón, A., Hernández, S., 2016. Analysis of satisfaction factors at urban transport interchanges: Measuring travelers’ attitudes to information, security and waiting, Congresses of the Polytechnic University of Valencia, CIT2016. Congress of Transport Engineering. doi: http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/CIT/CIT2016/paper/view/4207. Litman, 2008, Valuing Transit Service Quality Improvements, J. Public Transp., 11, 43, 10.5038/2375-0901.11.2.3 Litman, T., 2013. Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities: How Prices and Other Factors Affect Travel Behavior, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Masters, 1982, A Rasch model for partial credit scoring, Psychometrika, 47, 149, 10.1007/BF02296272 Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Transit Connectivity Study, 2006. Mobility Intermodality and Interchanges (MIMIC), (1999). European Commission, the Fourth Framework Research and Technological Development Programme. http://www.cordis.lu/transport/src/mimic.htm. Nathanail, 2008, Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the Hellenic railways, Transp. Res. Part A, 42, 48 Nilsson, 2005, Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis, Arch. Neurol. Scandinavia, 111, 264, 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00404.x Rasch, G., 1960. In B. Rasc (Ed.), Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (p. 184). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut. Smith, 1998, Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model, J. Outcome Meas., 2, 66 Steer Davies and Gleave, 1998. The Seamless Public Transport Journey. Report for London Docklands Development Corporation, London, UK. Wardman, 2001, The value of travel time: a review of British evidence, J. Transp. Econo. Policy, 32, 285 Wright, B.D., 1996. Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions. Wu, 2007 Yang, 2009, Exploring adoption difficulties in mobile banking services, Can. J. Adm. Sci., 26, 136, 10.1002/cjas.102 Yao, 2012, Adaptability analysis of service facilities in transfer subway stations, Math. Probl. Eng., 1 Yun, 2010, A study on the evaluation method of level of service in transfer walking facilities, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 28, 143