Sensitivity of different RT-qPCR solutions for SARS-CoV-2 detection
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alcoba-Florez, 2020, Fast SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR in preheated nasopharyngeal swab samples, Int J Infect Dis, 97, 66, 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.099
Cassaniti, 2020, Performance of VivaDiag COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test is inadequate for diagnosis of COVID-19 in acute patients referring to emergency room department, J Med Virol, 30
Corman, 2020, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, Euro Surveill, 25, 2000045, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
Esbin, 2020, Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: a rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for COVID-19 detection, RNA, 20, 771, 10.1261/rna.076232.120
Nalla, 2020, Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection assays using seven different primer-probe sets and one assay kit, J Clin Microbiol, 58, e00557, 10.1128/JCM.00557-20
Pan, 2020, Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples, Lancet Infect Dis, 20, 411, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30113-4
Patel, 2020, Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, mBio, 11, e00722, 10.1128/mBio.00722-20
Ramdas, 2020, ‘Test, re-test, re-test’: using inaccurate tests to greatly increase the accuracy of COVID-19 testing, Nat Med, 26, 810, 10.1038/s41591-020-0891-7
Vogels, 2020, Analytical sensitivity and efficiency comparisons of SARS-COV-2 qRT-PCR primer-probe sets, MedRxiv