Semantic relatedness and distinctive processing may inflate older adults’ positive memory bias

Memory and Cognition - Tập 47 - Trang 1431-1443 - 2019
Kylee T. Ack Baraly1,2,3, Alexandrine Morand2, Laura Fusca1, Patrick S. R. Davidson1, Pascal Hot2,3
1School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2CNRS, LPNC, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
3LPNC, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry, France

Tóm tắt

Emotional stimuli are often more semantically interrelated and relatively distinct than neutral stimuli. These factors can enhance memory for emotional stimuli in young adults, but their effects in older adults—and on the age-related positive memory bias—remain unknown. In the present article, we tested whether item relatedness and distinctiveness affect emotional memory in young adults (Exps. 1 and 2) and the positive memory bias in older adults (Exp. 2). In both experiments, participants studied positive, negative, and neutral pictures and performed free recall after 1 min and 45 min. To manipulate relatedness, the neutral pictures were either as highly interrelated as the emotional pictures (“related neutral”) or lower in semantic relatedness (“unrelated neutral”). To manipulate distinctiveness, we had participants process the emotional pictures in either a relatively distinct manner (mixed condition), by studying emotional and neutral pictures at the same time, or in a nondistinctive manner (unmixed condition), by studying and recalling each picture category separately. Overall, higher semantic relatedness (i.e., related-neutral vs. unrelated-neutral pictures) increased memory in both age groups. Distinctiveness did not affect memory in young adults, but it did alter the positive memory bias in older adults. Older adults recalled more positive than negative pictures when the pictures were processed in mixed sets, but not when they were processed in unmixed sets. These findings were consistent across both test delays. This suggests that previous reports, which were often based on mixed designs in which item interrelatedness was not controlled, may have overestimated the size and/or robustness of the positivity bias in older adults.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ack Baraly, K. T., Hot, P., Davidson, P. S. R., & Talmi, D. (2017). How emotional arousal enhances episodic memory. In J. H. Byrne (Ed. in Chief) & J. T. Wixted (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 295–324). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21051-1 Barnacle, G. E., Montaldi, D., Talmi, D., & Sommer, T. (2016). The list-composition effect in memory for emotional and neutral pictures: Differential contribution of ventral and dorsal attention networks to successful encoding. Neuropsychologia, 90, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.023 Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Bennion, K. A., Ford, J. H., Murray, B. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2013). Oversimplification in the study of emotional memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617713000945 Buchanan, T. W., Etzel, J. A., Adolphs, R., & Tranel, D. (2006). The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.022 Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Hawkley, L. C. (2011). Could and aging brain contribute to subjective well-being? In A. Todorov, S. Fiske, & D. Prentice (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind (pp. 249–262). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Carstensen, L. L., & DeLiema, M. (2018). The positivity effect: A negativity bias in youth fades with age. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.009 Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 Charles, S. T., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310 Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 302, 341–359. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities, mechanisms and performance (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Scherer, K. R. (2011). The Geneva Affective Picture Database (GAPED): A new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 468–477. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0064-1 Dewhurst, S. A., & Parry, L. A. (2000). Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/095414400750050222 Dolcos, F., Rice, H. J., & Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: Right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 819–825. Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., & Pillon, B. (2000). The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology, 55, 1621–1626. Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.588 Emery, L., & Hess, T. M. (2011). Cognitive consequences of expressive regulation in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020041 Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 Grühn, D., Scheibe, S., & Baltes, P. B. (2007). Reduced negativity effect in older adults’ memory for emotional pictures: The heterogeneity–homogeneity list paradigm. Psychology and Aging, 22, 644–649. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.644 Grühn, D., Sharifian, N., & Chu, Q. (2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31, 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000060 Grühn, D., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (2005). No aging bias favoring memory for positive material: Evidence from a heterogeneity–homogeneity list paradigm using emotionally toned words. Psychology and Aging, 20, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.579 Hadley, C. B., & MacKay, D. G. (2006). Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.79 Hamann, S. (2001). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 394–400. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/4615733 Hunt, C., Trammel, J., & Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J. (2015). The interaction of semantic relatedness and emotion: Why emotion may not lead to better memory. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 20, 45–51. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1023 Isaacowitz, D. M., Allard, E. S., Murphy, N. A., & Schlangel, M. (2009). The time course of age-related preferences toward positive and negative stimuli. Journals of Gerontology, 64B, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn036 Isaacowitz, D. M., Wadlinger, H. A., Goren, D., & Wilson, H. R. (2006). Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study. Psychology and Aging, 21, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.40 Kan, I. P., Garrison, S. L., Drummey, A. B., Emmert, B. E., Jr., & Rogers, L. L. (2017). The roles of chronological age and time perspective in memory positivity. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25, 598–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1356262 Koch, A., Alves, H., Krüger, T., & Unkelbach, C. (2016). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1171–1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000243 Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: Affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 201–206. Labouvie-Vief, G., Grühn, D., & Studer, J. (2010). Dynamic integration of emotion and cognition: Equilibrium regulation in development and aging. In R. M. Lerner, M. E. Lamb, & A. M. Freund (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development (Vol. 2, pp. 79–115). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report No. A-8). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology. Leclerc, C. M., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Age-related valence-based reversal in recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex on a visual search task. Social Neuroscience, 5, 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910903512296 Leclerc, C. M., & Kensinger, E. A. (2011). Neural processing of emotional pictures and words: A comparison of young and older adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2010.549864 Mather, M., Canli, T., English, T., Whitfield, S., Wais, P., Ochsner, K., . . . Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Amygdala responses to emotionally valenced stimuli in older and younger adults. Psychological Science, 15, 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00662.x Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005 Mather, M., & Knight, M. (2005). Goal-directed memory: The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional memory. Psychology and Aging, 20, 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.554 McDaniel, M. A., Dornburg, C. C., & Guynn, M. J. (2005). Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: Implications for distinctiveness. Memory & Cognition, 33, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195316 McGaugh, J. L. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144157 Murphy, N. A., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2008). Preferences for emotional information in older and younger adults: A meta-analysis of memory and attention tasks. Psychology and Aging, 23, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.263 Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., . . . Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x Naveh-Benjamin, M., Brav, T. K., & Levy, O. (2007). The associative memory deficit of older adults: The role of strategy utilization. Psychology and Aging, 22, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.202 Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., & Kreuger, S. (2005). Divided attention in younger and older adults: Effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.520 Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 826–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.826 Pourtois, G., Schettino, A., & Vuilleumier, P. (2013). Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: What is magic and what is not. Biological Psychology, 92, 492–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007 Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. Reed, A. E., Chan, L., & Mikels, J. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035194 Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 19, 523–542. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197149 Schmidt, S. R. (2002). Outstanding memories: The positive and negative effects of nudes on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.353 Schmidt, S. R., & Saari, B. (2007). The emotional memory effect: Differential processing or item distinctiveness? Memory & Cognition, 35, 1905–1916. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192924 St Jacques, P., Bessette-Symons, B., & Cabeza, R. (2009). Functional neuroimaging studies of aging and emotion: Fronto-amygdalar differences during emotional perception and episodic memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 819–825. St Jacques, P., Dolcos, F., & Cabeza, R. (2010). Effects of aging on functional connectivity of the amygdala during negative evaluation: A network analysis of fMRI data. Neurobiology of Aging, 31, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.012 Talmi, D. (2013). Enhanced emotional memory: Cognitive and neural mechanisms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 430–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413498893 Talmi, D., Grady, C. L., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Moscovitch, M. (2005). Neuroimaging the serial position curve: A test of single-store versus dual-store models. Psychological Science, 16, 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01601.x Talmi, D., Luk, B. T. C., McGarry, L. M., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). The contribution of relatedness and distinctiveness to emotionally-enhanced memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.002 Talmi, D., & McGarry, L. M. (2012). Accounting for immediate emotional memory enhancement. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.009 Talmi, D., & Moscovitch, M. (2004). Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words? Memory & Cognition, 32, 742–751. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195864 Talmi, D., Schimmack, U., Paterson, T., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory. Emotion, 7, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.89 Talmi, D., Ziegler, M., Hawksworth, J., Lalani, S., Herman, C. P., & Moscovitch, M. (2013). Emotional stimuli exert parallel effects on attention and memory. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.722527 Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36 Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011 Yonelinas, A. P., & Ritchey, M. (2015). The slow forgetting of emotional episodic memories: An emotional binding account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.009