Self-set salaries and creativity

Journal of Business Economics - Tập 91 - Trang 91-121 - 2020
Christian Brück1, Thorsten Knauer1, Harald Meier1, Anja Schwering2
1Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
2University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

Tóm tắt

Organizations frequently try to incentivize employees to develop highly creative solutions. In this study, we examine self-set salaries as a specific type of incentive design. We investigate whether self-set salaries affect employees’ motivation and overall (creative) performance. Moreover, because self-set salaries potentially risk opportunistic employee behavior, we consider the effect of the observability of peer performance on employees’ level of self-set salaries. Using a laboratory experiment, we hold the average employee compensation constant and demonstrate that, in comparison with fixed-pay contracts, self-set salaries increase the quantitative performance in creative tasks without affecting the average creativity. However, we do not find significant differences between the amount of individuals’ self-set salaries with observability of peer performance and the amount for individuals without the chance to observe peer performance. Our findings are important for firms that rely on the development of creative ideas but are unsure about the effects of the introduction of self-set salaries.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–299 Adler PS, Cheng CX (2011) Combining creativity and control: understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Account Org Soc 36:63–85 Amabile TM (1982) The social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. J Pers Soc Psychol 43:997–1013 Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity. Springer, New York Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAJ Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 123–167 Amabile TM (1993) Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Hum Resour Manage Rev 3:185–201 Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context. Westview Press, Boulder Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manage J 39:1154–1184 Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz N, Burnside R, Koester N (1990) Creative environment scales: work environment inventory. A guide to its development and use. Unpublished technical manual, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro Amabile TM, Gitomer J (1984) Children's artistic creativity: effects of choice in task materials. Pers Soc Psychol B 10:209–215 Armbruster BB (1989) Metacognition in creativity. In: Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR (eds) Handbook of creativity. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 177–182 Arrow K (1985) The economics of agency. In: Pratt J, Zeckhauser R (eds) Principals and agents: the structure of business. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 37–51 Baard PP, Deci EL, Ryan RM (2004) Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. J Appl Soc Psychol 34:2045–2068 Bailin S (1984) Can there be creativity without creation? Interchange 15:13–22 Bailyn L (1985) Autonomy in the industrial R&D laboratory. Hum Resour Manage 24:129–146 Baiman S (1990) Agency research in managerial accounting: a second look. Account Org Soc 15:341–371 Bonner SE, Sprinkle GB (2002) The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Account Org Soc 27:303–345 Bonner SE, Hastie R, Sprinkle GB, Young SM (2000) A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks: implications for management accounting. J Manage Account Res 12:19–64 Brüggen A, Feichter C, Wiliamson MG (2018) The effect of input and output targets for routine tasks on creative task performance. Account Rev 93:29–43 Byron K, Khazanchi S (2012) Rewards and creative performances: a meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychol B 138:809–830 Byron K, Khazanchi S, Nazarian D (2010) The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. J Appl Psychol 95:201–212 Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Jiménez N, Lacomba JA, Lago F (2012) The hidden advantage of delegation: Pareto improvements in a gift exchange game. Am Econ Rev 102:2358–2379 Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Lacomba JA, Lagos F, Perez JM (2015) Social comparisons in wage delegation: experimental evidence. Exp Econ 19:433–459 Charness G, Frechette GR, Kagel JH (2004) How Robust is laboratory gift exchange? Exp Econ 7:189–205 Chen CX, Wiliamson MG, Zhou FH (2012) Reward system design and group creativity: an experimental investigation. Account Rev 87:1885–1911 Condry J (1977) Enemies of exploration: self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. J Pers Soc Psychol 35:459–477 Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, Odessa Cropley AJ (2000) Defining and measuring creativity: are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Rev 23:72–80 Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit 47:1–27 Csikszentmihalyi M, Sawyer K (2014) Creative insight: the social dimension of a solitary moment. In: Csikszentmihalyi M (ed) The systems model of creativity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 73–98 Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New York Deci EL, Ryan RM (2008) Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Can Psychol 49:14–23 Deci EL, Ryan RM, Gagné M, Leone DR, Usunov J, Kornazheva BP (2001) Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country: a cross-cultural study of self-determination. Pers Soc Psychol B 27:930–942 De Dreu CK, Baas M, Nijstad BA (2008) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J Pers Soc Psychol 94:739–756 Demeré BW, Sedatole KL, Woods A (2019) The role of calibration committees in subjective performance evaluation systems. Manage Sci 65:1562–1585 El-Murad J, West DC (2004) The definition and measurement of creativity: what do we know? J Advert R 44:188–201 Eysenck HJ (1995) Genius: the natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J Labor Econ 24:39–57 Fallon P, Senn F (2006) Juicing the orange: how to turn creativity into a powerful business advantage. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge Faillo M, Piovanelli C (2017) Wage delegation and intrinsic motivation: an experimental study. In: CEEL working papers 1–17. Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italy Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Q J Econ 108:437–459 Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row Peterson, Evanston Franke J, Gurtoviy R, Mertins V (2016) Worker’s participation in wage setting: a gift-exchange experiment. J Econ Psychol 56:151–162 Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J Econ Surv 15:589–611 Gagné M, Deci EL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Org Behav 26:331–362 Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Q J Econ 115:791–810 Grabner I (2014) Incentive system design in creativity dependent firms. Account Rev 89:1729–1750 Griggs RA (2000) A one-minute “intelligence” test. Teach Psychol 27:132–134 Harrison JS, Freeman RE (2004) Is organization democracy worth the effort? Acad Manage Exec 18:49–53 Hocevar D (1981) Measurement of creativity: review and critique. J Pers Assess 45:450–464 Jeworrek S, Mertins V (2019) Wage delegation in the field. J Econ Manage Strat (forthcoming) Joussemet M, Koestner R (1999) Effect of expected rewards on children’s creativity. Creat Res J 12:231–239 Kachelmeier SJ, Reichert BE, Williamson MG (2008) Measuring and motivating quantity, creativity, or both. J Account Res 46:341–373 Kachelmeier SJ, Wang LW, Wiliamson MG (2019) Incentivizing the creative process: from initial quantity to eventual creativity. Account Rev 94:249–266 Kachelmeier SJ, Williamson MG (2010) Attracting creativity: the initial and aggregate effect of contract selection on creativity-weighted productivity. Account Rev 85:1669–1691 Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. Calif Manage Rev 39:53–79 Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol B 108:480–498 Lambert RA, Larcker DF, Weigelt K (1993) The structure of organizational incentives. Admin Sci Q 38:438–461 Laloux F (2014) Reinventing organizations: a guide to creating organizations inspired by the next stage in human consciousness. Nelson Parker, Brussels Liu D, Chen XP, Yao X (2011) From autonomy to creativity: a multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. J Appl Psychol 96:294–309 Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Am Econ Rev 99:112–145 Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J Market Res 45:633–644 McCrae RR, John OP (1992) An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers 60:175–215 Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev 69:220–232 Mellizo P, Carpenter J, Matthews PH (2014) Workplace democracy in the lap. Ind Relat J 45:313–328 Morris S (1983) Omni games: the best brainteasers from Omni magazine. Rinehart & Winston, New York Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity, personal and contextual factors at work. Acad Manage J 39:607–634 Paolillo JG, Brown WB (1978) How organizational factors affect R&D innovation. Res Manage 21:12–15 Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78 Ryan RM, Sheldon KM, Kasser T, Deci EL (1996) All goals were not created equal: an organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds) The psychology of action: linking motivation and cognition to behavior. Guilford, New York, pp 7–26 Semler R (1989) Managing without managers. Harvard Bus Rev 67:76–84 Semler R (2007) Out of this world: doing things the Semco way. Global Bus Org Excell 26:13–21 Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2001) Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: the role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Org Behav Hum Dec 84:1–22 Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effect of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J Manage 30:933–958 Sliwka D (2001) On the costs and benefits of delegation in organizations. J Inst Theor Econ 157:568–590 Speckbacher G (2017) Creativity research in management accounting: a commentary. J Manage Account Res 29:49–54 Sprinkle GB (2008) Discussion of: measuring and motivating quantity, creativity, or both. J Account Res 46:375–382 Torrance EP (1974) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Personnel Press, Lexington Tuna C (2008) Pay, your own way: firm lets workers pick salary. Wall Street J 7:86 Weisberg R (1993) Creativity, beyond the myth of genius. Freeman, New York Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manage Rev 18:293–321 Zhou J (1998) Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. J Appl Psychol 83:261–276 Zhou J, Shalley CE (2003) Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research. In: Martocchio J (ed) Research in personnel and human resource management. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 165–217