Self-Image and Health-Related Quality of Life Three Decades After Fusion In Situ for High-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
Tóm tắt
Observational study. To evaluate self-image after in situ fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Certain clinical findings such as short trunk or waistline skin folds are often seen in high-grade spondylolisthesis. Since treatment with spinal fusion in situ does not address appearance, self-image and also health-related quality of life might be negatively affected in the short-term as well as the long-term perspective. This observational study evaluated health-related quality of life outcome including self-image three decades after in situ fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in relation to healthy controls. Thirty-eight of 39 consecutive patients, fused in situ for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis at a young age, completed the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r questionnaire 28–41 years after surgery. The results were compared with the results of an age- and gender-matched control group. We found that the SRS-22r self-image domain scores were statistically significantly lower in patients than in controls whereas the pain and mental health scores were similar in patients and controls. Also, the SRS-22r function domain scores were statistically significantly lower in patients but the difference in means was small. We found no correlation between severity of slip and SRS-22r outcome. In situ fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis is a safe treatment option in the long term from a function and pain perspective, but the results of our study suggest that self-image is negatively affected long into adult life. Level IV.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Turner RH, Bianco Jr AJ. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and teen-agers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:1298–306.
Harris IE, Weinstein SL. Long-term follow-up of patients with grade-III and IV spondylolisthesis. Treatment with and without posterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:960–9.
Hensinger RN. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1098–107.
Matthiass HH, Heine J. The surgical reduction of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:34–44.
Lonstein JE. Spondylolisthesis in children. Cause, natural history, and management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:2640–8.
Johnson JR, Kirwan EO. The long-term results of fusion in situ for severe spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65:43–6.
Freeman 3rd BL, Donati NL. Spinal arthrodesis for severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:594–8.
Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Hyvarinen H, et al. Severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. A long-term review of fusion in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:259–65.
Grzegorzewski A, Kumar SJ. In situ posterolateral spine arthrodesis for grades III, IV, and V spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:506–11.
Joelson A, Hedlund R, Frennered K. Normal health-related quality of life and ability to work twenty-nine years after in situ arthrodesis for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e100.
Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1435–40.
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:63–9.
Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:593–7.
Boachie-Adjei O, Do T, Rawlins BA. Partial lumbosacral kyphosis reduction, decompression, and posterior lumbosacral transfixation in high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: clinical and radiographic results in six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:E161–8.
Helenius I, Lamberg T, Osterman K, et al. Posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in young patients: a long-term evaluation using the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:190–6.
Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, et al. Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:583–90.
Jalanko T, Helenius I, Remes V, et al. Operative treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in children: A long-term, retrospective comparative study with matched cohorts. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:766–75.
Harroud A, Labelle H, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong JM. Global sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life in lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:849–56.
Bourassa-Moreau E, Mac-Thiong JM, Joncas J, et al. Quality of life of patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis: minimum 2-year follow-up after surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Spine J. 2013;13:770–4.
Lundine KM, Lewis SJ, Al-Aubaidi Z, et al. Patient outcomes in the operative and nonoperative management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34:483–9.
Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, Joncas J, et al. The importance of proximal femoral angle on sagittal balance and quality of life in children and adolescents with high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2038–43.
Beauséjour M, Joncas J, Goulet L, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted French Canadian version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:623–8.
Gutman G, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong JM, et al. Measurement properties of the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire in adolescent patients with spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:1316–21.
Danielsson AJ, Romberg K. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r) patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:1875–84.
Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932;54:371–7.
Harrington PR. Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962;44:591–610.
Whitecloud 3rd TS, Butler JC. Anterior lumbar fusion utilizing transvertebral fibular graft. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13:370–4.
Diarbakerli E, Grauers A, Gerdhem P. Population-based normative data for the Scoliosis Research Society 22r questionnaire in adolescents and adults, including a comparison with EQ-5D. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1631–7.
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
Lai SM, Burton DC, Asher MA, Carlson BB. Converting SRS-24, SRS-23, and SRS-22 to SRS-22r: establishing conversion equations using regression modeling. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1525–33.
Wiltse LL, Jackson DW. Treatment of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:92–100.
Bagó J, Pérez-Grueso FJ, Les E, et al. Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1898–904.
Crawford 3rd CH, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, et al. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:377–81.
Carreon LY, Kelly MP, Crawford 3rd CH, et al. SRS-22R minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after adult lumbar scoliosis surgery. Spine Deform. 2018;6:79–83.
Carragee EJ. The rise and fall of the “minimum clinically important difference”. Spine J. 2010;10:283–4.
Chung AS, Copay AG, Olmscheid N, et al. Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the spine literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:1096–105.