Selective attention in a synchronising bushcricket: physiology, behaviour and ecology

Vivek Nityananda1, Jürgen Stradner2, Rohini Balakrishnan1, Heinrich Römer2
1Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
2Institute for Zoology, Karl-Franzens-University, Graz, Austria

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander RD (1967) Acoustical communication in Arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 12:495–526

Bailey WJ, Greenfield MD, Shelley TE (1993) Transmission and perception of acoustic signals in the desert clicker, Ligurotettix coquilletti (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J Insect Behav 6:141–154

Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic, New York

Brenowitz EA (1989) Neighbour call amplitude influences aggressive behaviour and intermale spacing in choruses of the Pacific treefrog (Hyla regilla). Ethology 83:69–79

Brenowitz EA, Wilczynski W, Zakon HH (1984) Acoustic communication in spring peepers. Environmental and behavioural aspects. J Comp Physiol 155:585–592

Fertschai I, Stradner J, Römer H (2007) Neuroethology of female preference in the synchronously singing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera): why do followers call at all? J Exp Biol 210:465–476

Frank H, Althoen SC (1994) Statistics concepts and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Gerhardt HC, Diekamp B, Ptacek M (1989) Inter-male spacing in choruses of the spring peeper, Pseudacris (Hyla) crucifer. Anim Behav 38:1012–1024

Greenfield MD (1994) Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:97–126

Greenfield MD, Roizen I (1993) Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice. Nature 364:618–620

Greenfield MD, Snedden WA (2003) Selective attention and the spatio-temporal structure of orthopteran choruses. Behaviour 140:1–26

Greenfield MD, Tourtellot MK, Snedden WA (1997) Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1355–1361

Hartbauer M, Kratzer S, Steiner K, Römer H (2005) Mechanisms for synchrony and alternation in song interactions of the bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigonidae: Orthoptera). J Comp Physiol A 191:175–188

Minckley RL, Greenfield MD, Tourtellot MK (1995) Chorus structure in tarbush grasshoppers: inhibition, selective phonoresponse and signal competition. Anim Behav 50:579–594

Nityananda V, Balakrishnan R (2006) A diversity of songs among morphologically indistinguishable katydids of the genus Mecopoda (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae) from southern India. Bioacoustics 15:223–250

Nityananda V, Balakrishnan R (2007) Synchrony during acoustic interactions in the bushcricket Mecopoda ‘Chirper’ (Tettigoniidae:Orthoptera) is generated by a combination of chirp-by-chirp resetting and change in intrinsic chirp rate. J Comp Physiol A 193:51–65

Pollack GS (1988) Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8:2635–2639

Römer H (1998) The sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–96

Römer H, Bailey WJ (1986) Insect hearing in the field. II. Male spacing behaviour and correlated acoustic cues in the bushcricket Mygalopsis markii. J Comp Physiol A 159:627–638

Römer H, Krusch M (2000) A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 186:181–191

Römer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:437–444

Römer H, Marquart V, Hardt M (1988) Organization of a sensory neuropile in the auditory pathway of two groups of orthoptera. J Comp Neurol 275:201–215

Römer H, Hedwig B, Ott SR (2002) Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata. Eur J Neurosci 15:1655–1662

Snedden A, Greenfield MD, Jang Y (1998) Mechanisms of selective attention in grasshopper choruses: who listens to whom? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:59–66