Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control

Journal of Social Issues - Tập 46 Số 1 - Trang 27-46 - 1990
Albert Bandura1,2
1ALBERT BANDURA is David Starr Jordan Professor of Social Sciences in Psychology at Stanford University. He is a proponent of social cognitive theory, which accords a central role to cognitive, vicarious, self-regulatory, and self-reflective processes in sociocognitive functioning. His recent book, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, provides the conceptual framework and analyzes the large body of knowledge bearing on this theory. Bandura is past president of the American Psychological Association and a recipient of its Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award.
2Stanford University

Tóm tắt

Moral conduct is motivated and regulated mainly by the ongoing exercise of self‐reactive influence. But self‐regulatory mechanisms do not operate unless they are activated, and there are different psychological mechanisms by which moral control can be selectively activated or disengaged from inhumane conduct. Self‐sanctions can be disengaged by reconstruing detrimental conduct through moral justification, euphemistic labeling, and advantageous contrast with other inhumanities; by obscuring personal agency in detrimental activities through diffusion and displacement of responsibility; by disregarding or misrepresenting the harmful consequences of inhumane conduct; and by blaming and dehumanizing the victims. These mechanisms of moral disengagement operate not only in the perpetration of inhumanities under extraordinary circumstances, but in everyday situations where people routinely perform activities that bring personal benefits at injurious costs to others. Given the many psychological devices for disengagement of moral control, societies cannot rely solely on individuals, however honorable their standards, to provide safeguards against inhumanities. To function humanely, societies must establish effective social safeguards against moral disengagement practices that foster exploitive and destructive conduct.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrus B. C., 1969, The infamous of Nuremberg

Baldwin T. F., 1972, Television and social behavior: Vol. I. Media content and control, 290

Ball‐Rokeach S. J., 1972, Collective violence, 100

Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory

Bandura A., 1990, Handbook of moral behavior and development: Theory, research and applications

Bandura A., 1990, Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind, 161

Bandura A., 1990, Social referencing and social construction of reality

10.1016/0092-6566(75)90001-X

10.2307/1142904

Bernard V., 1965, Behavioral science and human survival, 64

Bolinger D., 1982, Language: The loaded weapon

10.1016/0092-6566(83)90023-5

10.1037/h0048948

10.1037/h0042571

10.1080/10576108208435531

10.1177/0002716283469001006

10.2224/sbp.1977.5.1.143

10.1037/h0076279

Ellsworth P.(1978).Attitudes toward capital punishment: From application to theory.Unpublished manuscript Yale University.

10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156

Gambino R.(1973 Watergate lingo: A language of non‐responsibility.Freedom at Issue pp.7–9 15–17.

Gibson J. T. &Haritos‐Fatouros M.(1986 The education of a torturer.Psychology Today pp.50–58.

Hallie P. P., 1971, Sanctions for evil, 247

Haney C., 1973, Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison, International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69

Hechinger F. M.(1985 Down with doublespeak.San Francisco Chronicle (This Worldsection) p.19.

10.1177/009059177900700303

Hilgartner S., 1982, Nukespeak: Nuclear language, visions, and mindset

Johnson J. T., 1984, Can modern war be just

Kavka G. S., 1988, Moral paradoxes of nuclear deterrence

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x

10.1111/j.1939-0025.1970.tb00716.x

10.1037/h0036636

Kipnis D., 1974, Perspectives on social power, 82

Kramer M., 1990, Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind

Lackey D. P., 1984, Moral principles and nuclear weapons

10.1017/S0265052500000212

Lang D. A., 1974, A reporter at large: The bank drama (Swedish hostages), New Yorker, 50, 56

10.1037/h0032876

10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030

Levi P., 1987, The drowned and the saved

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01075.x

10.1016/B978-0-12-466280-3.50008-7

10.1111/j.2044-8260.1976.tb00030.x

10.1002/ejsp.2420160402

Milgram S., 1974, Obedience to authority: An experimental view

10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1111

10.1037/h0033037

Rapoport D. C., 1982, The morality of terrorism: Religious and secular justification

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00998.x

10.1016/B978-0-12-278850-5.50009-0

Safire W.(1979 The fine art of euphemism.San Francisco Chronicle p.13.

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01068.x

Sanford N., 1971, Sanctions for evil

San Francisco Chronicle.(1979 Award‐winning nuclear jargonp.24.

Shippee G. E. &Christian M.(1978).Ego‐defensive attributions for an offensive problem: Attributions of responsibility and air pollution severity.Paper presented at meeting of the Western Psychological Association San Francisco.

10.1037/h0028773

10.1016/B978-0-12-466280-3.50012-9

Zimbardo P. G., 1969, Nebraska symposium on motivation, 237

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Social Issues

Tập 46 Số 1

27-46

Thông tin tác giả