Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: Evidence from aguaruna cultivars ofManihot esculenta

Ayensu, E. S., and D. G. Coursey. 1973. Guinea yams: The botany, ethnobotany, use and possible future of yams in West Africa. Econ. Bot. 27: 301–318.

Berlin, B. 1976. The concept of rank in ethnobiological classification: some evidence from Aguaruna folk biology. Amer. Ethnol. 3: 381–399.

—, and E. A. Berlin. 1978. Ethnobiología, subsistencia, y nutrición en una sociedád de la selva tropical: los Aguaruna (Jibaro).In A. Chirif, ed, Salúd y Nutritioń en Sociedades Nativas, p. 13–47. Centro de Investigation y Promotión Amazónica, Lima.

—, J. S. Boster, and J. P. O’Neill. 1981. The perceptual bases of ethnobiological classification: evidence from Aguaruna Jívaro ornithology. J. Ethnobiology 1: 95–108.

—, D. E. Breedlove, and P. H. Raven. 1966. Folk taxonomies and biological classification. Science 154: 273–275.

—, —, and —. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Amer. Anthropol. 75: 214–242.

Boster, J. S. 1980. How the exceptions prove the rule: an analysis of informant disagreement in Aguaruna manioc identification. Ph.D. diss., Univ. California, Berkeley.

—. 1983. A comparison of the diversity of Jívaroan gardens with that of the tropical forest. Human Ecol. 11: 47–68.

-. 1984. Classification, cultivation, and selection in Aguaruna cultivars ofManihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae).In G. Prance and J. Kallunki, ed, Ethnobotany in the Neotropics. Advances Econ. Bot. 1: 34–47.

-. In press a. ’Requiem for the omniscient informant’: There’s life in the old girl yet.In J. Dougherty, ed, Directions in Cognitive Anthropology. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.

-. In press b. Inferring decision making from preferences and behavior: an analysis of Aguaruna Jivaro manioc selection. Human Ecol.

Brush, S. B., H. J. Carney, and Z. Huamán. 1981. Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture. Econ. Bot. 35: 70–88.

Conklin, H. C. 1957. Hanunóo agriculture: a report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. F.A.O. Forest. Developm. Paper, No. 12, Rome.

Dodds, K. 1965. The history and relationships of cultivated potatoes.In J. Hutchinson, ed, Essays on Crop Plant Evolution, p. 123–141. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

Guallart, J. 1964. Los Jíbaros del Alto Marañón. América Indígena 24: 315–332.

Harlan, J. 1975. Crops and Man. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

Hays, T. 1974. Mauna: Explorations in Ndumba Ethnobotany. Ph.D. diss., Univ. Washington, Seattle, WA.

Hunn, E. 1982. The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. Amer. Anthropol. 82: 830–847.

Nordenskiold, E. 1924. The ethnography of South America as seen from Mojos in Bolivia. Comparative Ethnological Studies 3. Gothenburg.

Pielou, E. C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York.

Renvoize, B. S. 1973. The area of origin ofManihot esculenta as a crop plant—a review of the evidence. Econ. Bot. 26: 352–360.

Rogers, D. J. 1963. Studies ofManihot esculenta Crantz and related species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 90: 43–54.

—. 1965. Some botanical and ethnological considerations ofManihot esculenta. Econ. Bot. 19: 369–377.

-, and S. G. Appan. 1973.Manihot andManihotoides (Euphorbiaceae): a computer-assisted study. Organization for Flora Neotropica, Monograph No. 13, New York.

—, and H. S. Fleming. 1973. A monographof Manihot esculenta with an explanation of the taximetrics methods used. Econ. Bot. 27: 1–113.

Uriarte, L. 1977. Poblaciones nativas de la Amazonía Peruana. Amazonia 1: 9–58.

Yen, D. E. 1968. Natural and human selection in the Pacific Sweet potato.In E. T. Drake, ed, Evolution and Environment, p. 387–142. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.