Selection effects and database screening in forensic science

Evett, 1998 2005 Balding, 2005 Fung, 2008 Stockmarr, 1999, Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search, Biometrics, 55, 671, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00671.x National Research Council, 1992 National Research Council, 1996 Walsh, 2005, DNA intelligence databases Meester, 2003, The evidential value in the DNA database search controversy and the two-stain problem, Biometrics, 59, 727, 10.1111/1541-0420.00084 Meester, 2004, Why the effect of prior odds should accompany the likelihood ratio when reporting DNA evidence, Law, Probability and Risk, 3, 51, 10.1093/lpr/3.1.51 Aitken, 1991, Population and samples Stoney, 1991, Transfer evidence Robertson, 1995 Aitken, 2004 Evett, 1998, A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic science, Science & Justice, 38, 241, 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72118-5 Cook, 1998, A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework, Science and Justice, 38, 231, 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72117-3 Balding, 1996, DNA profile evidence when the suspect is identified through a database search, Journal of Forensic Science, 41, 603, 10.1520/JFS13961J Dawid, 1996, Coherent analysis of forensic identification evidence, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 58, 425 Dawid, 2001, Comment on Stockmarr's “Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search”, Biometrics, 976 Balding, 2002, The DNA database search controversy, Biometrics, 58, 241, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00241.x Donnelly, 1999, DNA database searches and the legal consumption of scientific evidence, Michigan Law Review, 97, 931, 10.2307/1290377 D.H. Kaye, Rounding up the usual suspects: a legal and logical analysis of DNA trawling cases, North Carolina Law Review (2009) 87 (2).