Seismic fragility analysis of suspended cable trays in civil buildings

Miranda, 2012, Performance of nonstructural components during the 27 february 2010 chile earthquake, Earthq Spectra, 28, 453, 10.1193/1.4000032 Nazer MH, Elahi FA. Seismic vulnerabiliy of nonstructural components of hospitals.13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancourer, 2004, Paper No. 1520. Wang YM, Xiong L, and XU WX. Seismic damage and damage enlightenment of medical buildings in lushan ms 7.0 earthquake. J Earthquake Eng Eng Vibr 2013, 33(04): 44-53. (in Chinese). Zhou, 2012, Inspection report of the disaster of the East Japan earthquake by Sino-Japanese joint mission. Building, Structure, 42, 1 Masuzawa Y, Kanai T, Hisada Y, et al. Study on aseismic performance of integrated ceiling system and anti-fall measures of ceiling. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile,2017:4689. Goodno, 2011, Effects of the January 2010 Haitian earthquake on selected electrical equipment, Earthq Spectra, 27, 251, 10.1193/1.3636415 National Institute of Building Sciences estimate dannualized earthquake losses for the United States. Washington, D. C: Federal Emergency Management Afency, 2008. Villaverde, 1997, Seismic design of secondary structures: state of the art, J Struct Eng, 123, 1011, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:8(1011) Elsabee F, Anagnostis S, Djordjevic W. Seismic evaluation of electrical raceway systems. In: ASME Paper 83-PVP-18. 4th National Congress on PressureVessel and Piping Technology, Portland, OR, USA, 1983, 19–24. Huang, 20178, Shaking table tests of the cable tray system in nuclear power plants, J Perform Constr Facil, 31, 04017018, 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001009 Reigles, 2016, Test-based approach to cable tray support system analysis and design: Behavior and test methods, Nucl Eng Des, 302, 27, 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.03.026 Fiorino, 2019, Evaluation of seismic dynamic behaviour of drywall partitions, façades and ceilings through shake table testing, Eng Struct, 180, 103, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.028 Fiorino, 2023, In-plane seismic behaviour behavior of lightweight steel drywall façades through quasi-static reversed cyclic tests, Thin-Walled Struct, 182, 10.1016/j.tws.2022.110157 McMenamin D. Case studies of central office cable tray support failures. International Telecommunications Energy Conference, Vancouver, Canada,1994, 219-223. Seki Y, Matsuda K, Kasai K. Development study of passively-controlled cable rack for electric wiring Part 5. Testing of joint of cable rack for electric wiring. Proc. Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan, 129-130, Japan, 2016 August. Wu, 2022, Performance-based optimum seismic design of cable tray system, J Constr Steel Res, 197, 107448, 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107448 Mizutani, 2020, 9 Lu, 2015, A Benchmark Model of Mega-tall Buildings and Analysis of its Seismic responses, Struct Eng, 31, 100 DGJ08-9-2013. Code for seismic design of buildings in Shanghai. Standards Press of China, 2013. (in Chinese). DiPasquale, 19905, Relation between global damage indices and local stiffness degradation, J Struct Eng, 116, 1440, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:5(1440) Matsuda K, Kasai K, Study on seismic behavior of cable rack system for electric wiring having passive control scheme. The 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2017. Jiang, 2023, Hysteretic model for main to sub beam joints of cable tray, Journal of Building, Engineering, 72, 106471 Cornell, 2002, Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines, J Struct Eng, 128, 526, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526) International Code Council (ICC), 2000, 2003. International Building Code, Falls Church, VA. 2004. AC156 Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Qualification by Shake Table Testing of Nonstructural Components and Systems, Falls Church, VA. FEMA P-58. seismic performance assessment of buildings [R]. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012.