Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures infilled with masonry infill walls
Tóm tắt
The current research work aims to investigate the seismic performance of the reinforced concrete structures fully, as well as, partially infilled with masonry infill (MI) walls. For that, a numerical study of three groups of two-dimensional framed structure has been conducted under dynamic time–history analysis. The three building groups are classified as nine, six and three stories representing high-rise building, medium-rise building, and low-rise building, respectively. Different infill walls’ configurations have been studied for each group to simulate the bare frame, the infilled frame, the open ground story frame, and the partially opened ground story frame. Double-strut nonlinear cyclic model for MI walls has been utilized to represent nonlinear behavior of infill walls in the framed structures using the structural software package SeismoStruct software. Dynamic time–history analysis, using three different ground motion records to represent wide range of frequency content, has been utilized to study the performance of the studied cases under seismic loading conditions. Based on the obtained results, the seismic performance of the framed structures is strongly influenced after using the infill walls. However, removing the MI walls from the ground story leads to soft story phenomena and makes the structures vulnerable to collapse especially in moderate-to-severe earthquakes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdelaziz, M. M., Gomaa, M. S., & El-Ghazaly, H. (2017). Effect of Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls on Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Framed Structures. The Open Civil Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501711010919.
Asteris, P. G. (2003). Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames. Journal of structural engineering, 129(8), 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1071).
Bertero, V., & Brokken, S. (1983). Infills in seismic resistant building. Journal of Structural Engineering, 109(6), 1337–1361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:6(1337).
Crisafulli, F. J. (1997). Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/1221.
Dhanasekar, M., Page, A.W., and Kleeman, P.W. (1985). Infulence of Masonry Infill on The Behavior of Structural Frames. In National Conference Publication-Institution of Engineers, Australia, 81:20–25. Thomas Telford-ICE Virtual Library, https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1986.463.
ECP-201. 2012. Egyptian Code for Calculating Loads and Forces in Structural Work and Masonry. Cairo: Housing and Building National Research Center. Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Planning
ECP-203. 2007. Egyptian Code for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Cairo: Housing and Building National Research Center. Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Planning.
Furtado, A., Rodrigues, H., Arêde, A., & Varum, H. (2016). Experimental evaluation of out-of-plane capacity of masonry infill walls. Engineering Structures, 111, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2015.12.013.
Hashemi, A., & Mosalam, K. M. (2006). Shake-table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(14), 1827–1852. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.612.
Holmes, M. (1963). Combined loading on infilled frames. Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 25(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1963.10685.
Humar, J. M., Lau, D., & Pierre, J. R. (2001). Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(6), 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-28-6-979.
Kwon, O. S., & Elnashai, A. (2006). The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Engineering Structures, 28(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010.
Mallick, D. V., & Severn, R. T. (1967). The behaviour of infilled frames under static loading. ICE Proceedings, 38(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1967.8192.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mehrabi, A. B., Benson Shing, P., Schuller, M. P., & Noland, J. L. (1996). Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228).
Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R. C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In Proceedings of IABSE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Loads, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-13741.
Milheiro, J., Rodrigues, H., & Arêde, A. (2016). Evaluation of the contribution of masonry infill panels on the seismic behaviour of two existing reinforced concrete buildings. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), 1365–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0112-y.
Mosalam, K. M., Ayala, G., White, R. N., & Roth, C. (1997). Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1(04), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962384.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (2000). “PEER Strong Motion Database”. http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/
Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings.
Pinho, R., & Elnashai, A. S. (2000). Dynamic collapse testing of a full-scale four storey RC frame. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 37(4), 143–163.
Pinto, A., Verzeletti, G., Molina, J., Varum, H., Pinho, R., & Coelho, E. (2002). Pseudo-dynamic tests on non-seismic resisting RC frames (bare and selective retrofit frames). EUR Report, 20244.
Polyakov, S. V. (1956). Masonry in Framed Buildings. In Published by: Gosudarstvennos Izdate’stvo Literatury Po Stroitel’stvu i Arkhitekture, Moscow. Translated from the Russian by G.L. Cairns.
Polyakov, S. V. (1960). On the Interaction between masonry filler walls and enclosing frame when loading in the plane of the wall. Translation in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), 2(3), 36–42.
Saatcioglu, M., & Bruneau, M. (1993). Performance of structures during the 1992 Erzincan earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1139/l93-035.
SeismoSoft, SeismoStruct V.7 (2014). A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures, Available at URL: http://Www.Seismosoft.Com.” n.d.
Sezen, H., Whittaker, A. S., Elwood, K. J., & Mosalam, K. M. (2003). Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey. Engineering Structures, 25(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9.
Smyrou, E., Blandon, C., Antoniou, S., Pinho, R., & Crisafulli, F. (2011). Implementation and verification of a masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of infilled RC frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9(5), 1519–1534.