Seismic Study of Buckling Restrained Brace System without Concrete Infill

International Journal of Steel Structures - Tập 18 - Trang 153-162 - 2018
Hassanali Mosalman Yazdi1, Mohammadreza Mosalman1, Abdollah Mohsen Soltani1
1Civil Engineering Department, Maybod Branch, Islamic azad University, Yazd, Iran

Tóm tắt

Bracing is the one of the best-known means of seismic retrofitting. Buckling restrained brace (BRB) is a certain type of brace with great efficiency against lateral loading. This paper presents the results of a finite element analysis on a BRB in which casing has no concrete infill. The core segment of this brace is similar to the conventional BRB, but it has a different buckling restraining system. The aim of this paper was to perform a parametric seismic study on the effect of a gap and also the effect of friction between the core and the casing and to evaluate the buckling behavior of these braces in response to changes in the initial shape of the bracing system. The results show that the flexural stiffness of the casing system, regardless of size of the gap, can significantly affect the buckling behavior of bracing.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Clark, P., I. Aiken, F. Tajirian, K. Kasai, E. and Ko I. Kimura (1999). “Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices.” Design Procedures for Buildings Incorporating Hysteretic Damping Devices, 1(1), pp. 1–21. Eryasar, M. (2009). “Experimental and numerical investigation of buckling restrained braces.” Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. Hibbitt, K. (2010). Sorensen Inc. ABAQUS/standard user’s manual, version 6.10. 1. Pawtucket (RI): Hibbitt, Karlsson, & Sorensen, Inc. Kato, M., T. and Usami A. Kasai (2002). “A numerical study on cyclic elasto-plastic behavior of buckling-restraining brace members.” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering A, 48, pp 641–648. Y. Koetaka, T. Kinoshita, K. Inoue and K. Iitani (2008). Criteria of buckling-restrained braces to prevent out-ofplane buckling. Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. T. Takeuchi, K. Suzuki, T. Marukawa, Y. Kimura, T. Ogawa, T. Sugiyama and S. Kato (2005). “Performance of compressive tube members with buckling restrained composed of mortar in-filled steel tube.” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 590, pp. 71–78. Tembata, H., Y. Koetaka and K. Inoue (2004). “Out-of-plane buckling load of buckling-restrained braces including brace joints.” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 581, pp. 127–134. Tremblay, R., P. Bolduc, R. and Neville R. DeVall (2006). “Seismic testing and performance of buckling-restrained bracing systems.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(2), pp. 183–198. T. Usami, H. Ge and X.-Q. Luo (2009). Experimental and analytical study on high-performance buckling restrained brace dampers for bridge engineering. 3rd International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, Citeseer. A. Watanabe, Y. Hitomi, E. Saeki, A. Wada and M. Fujimoto (1988). Properties of brace encased in bucklingrestraining concrete and steel tube. Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Xie, Q. (2005). “State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia.”, Journal of constructional steel research, 61(6), pp. 727–748.