Topol, 1995, Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease, Circulation, 92, 2333, 10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2333
Mintz, 1996, Limitations of angiography in the assessment of plaque distribution in coronary artery disease: A systematic study of target lesion eccentricity in 1446 lesions, Circulation, 93, 24, 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.924
Gould, 2009, Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy?, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2, 1009, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.06.004
Davies, 1997, Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: Outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization, Circulation, 95, 2037, 10.1161/01.CIR.95.8.2037
Shaw, 2004, Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT, J Nucl Cardiol, 11, 171, 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2003.12.004
Beller, 2010, Decision Making in Multivessel Coronary Disease: The Need for Physiological Lesion Assessment, J Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 3, 315, 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.007
Lima, 2003, Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease, J Am Coll Cardiology, 42, 64, 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00562-X
Lin, 2008, Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary interventions, JAMA, 300, 1765, 10.1001/jama.300.15.1765
Bech, 2001, Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: A randomized trial, Circulation, 103, 2928, 10.1161/01.CIR.103.24.2928
Pijls, 1995, Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow, Circulation, 92, 3183, 10.1161/01.CIR.92.11.3183
Pijls, 1996, Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery-stenoses, N Engl J Med, 334, 1703, 10.1056/NEJM199606273342604
de Bruyne, 1994, Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography, Circulation, 89, 1013, 10.1161/01.CIR.89.3.1013
Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, et al. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. Am Heart J. 2007;154:632-6.
Tonino, 2009, Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention, N Engl J Med, 360, 213, 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
Bech, 1998, Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement, J Am Coll Cardiol, 31, 841, 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00050-3
Pijls, 2007, Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 49, 2105, 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087
Pijls, 2010, Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 56, 177, 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012
Bassand, 2000, J Am Coll Cardiol, 36, 959, 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4
Thygesen, 2007, Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 50, 2173, 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.011
Rieber, 2007, Five-year follow-up in patients after therapy stratification based on intracoronary pressure measurement, Am Heart J, 153, 403, 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.11.013
Fearon, 2010, Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease, Circulation, 122, 2545, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.925396