Seasonal variation of responses to herbivory and volatile communication in sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) (Asteraceae)

Journal of Plant Research - Tập 129 - Trang 659-666 - 2016
Satomi Ishizaki1, Kaori Shiojiri2, Richard Karban3, Masashi Ohara4
1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
2The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
3Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, USA
4Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Tóm tắt

Plants can respond to insect herbivory in various ways to avoid reductions in fitness. However, the effect of herbivory on plant performance can vary depending on the seasonal timing of herbivory. We investigated the effects of the seasonal timing of herbivory on the performance of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). Sagebrush is known to induce systemic resistance by receiving volatiles emitted from clipped leaves of the same or neighboring plants, which is called volatile communication. Resistance to leaf herbivory is known to be induced most effectively after volatile communication in spring. We experimentally clipped 25 % of leaves of sagebrush in May when leaves were expanding, or in July when inflorescences were forming. We measured the growth and flower production of clipped plants and neighboring plants which were exposed to volatiles emitted from clipped plants. The treatment conducted in spring reduced the growth of clipped plants. This suggests that early season leaf herbivory is detrimental because it reduces the opportunities for resource acquisition after herbivory, resulting in strong induction of resistance in leaves. On the other hand, the late season treatment increased flower production in plants exposed to volatiles, which was caused mainly by the increase in the number of inflorescences. Because the late season treatment occurred when sagebrush produces inflorescences, sagebrush may respond to late herbivory by increasing compensation ability and/or resistance in inflorescences rather than in leaves. Our results suggest that sagebrush can change responses to herbivory and subsequent volatile communication seasonally and that the seasonal variation in responses may reduce the cost of induced resistance.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arimura G, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Nishioka T, Boland W, Takabayashi J (2000) Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves. Nature 406:512–515 Arimura G, Shiojiri K, Karban R (2010) Acquired immunity to herbivory and allelopathy caused by airborne plant emissions. Phytochemistry 71:1642–1649 Barton KE, Koricheva J (2010) The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. Am Nat 175:481–493 Boege K, Marquis RJ (2005) Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 20:441–448 Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335 Doan AT, Ervin G, Felton G (2004) Temporal effects on jasmonate induction of anti-herbivore defense in Physalis angulata: seasonal and ontogenic gradients. Biochem Syst Ecol 32:117–126 Evans RD, Black RA (1993) Growth, photosynthesis, and resource investment for vegetative and reproductive modules of Artemisia tridentata. Ecology 74:1516–1528 Feeny P (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565–581 Fenner M, Hanley ME, Lawrence R (1999) Comparison of seedling and adult palatability in annual and perennial plants. Funct Ecol 13:546–551 García MB, Ehrlén J (2002) Reproductive effort and herbivory timing in a perennial herb: fitness components at the individual and population levels. Am J Bot 89:1295–1302 Gustafsson C (2004) The effect of timing and amount of leaf removal on survival, growth and reproduction in the perennial herb Sanicula europea L. Plant Ecol 170:29–34 Hare JD (2010) Ontogeny and season constrain the production of herbivore-inducible plant volatiles in the field. J Chem Ecol 36:1363–1374 Heil M, Karban R (2010) Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. Trends Ecol Evol 25:137–144 Ishizaki S, Narumi T, Mizushima M, Ohara M (2010) Effect of the specialist herbivore Luehdorfia puziloi on the performance of a woodland herbaceous plant, Asarum heterotropoides. Plant Spec Biol 25:61–67 Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Karban R, Baldwin IT, Baxter KJ, Laue G, Felton GW (2000) Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush. Oecologia 125:66–71 Karban R, Maron J, Felton GW, Ervin G, Eichenseer H (2003) Herbivore damage to sagebrush induces resistance in wild tobacco: evidence for eavesdropping between plants. Oikos 100:325–332 Karban R, Shiojiri K, Huntzinger M, McCall AC (2006) Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication. Ecology 87:922–930 Karban R, Ishizaki S, Shiojiri K (2012) Long-term demographic consequences of eavesdropping for sagebrush. J Ecol 100:932–938 Knight TM (2007) Population-level consequences of herbivory timing in Trillium grandiflorum. Am Midl Nat 157:27–38 Lennartsson T, Nilsson P, Tuomi J (1998) Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris. Ecology 79:1061–1072 Marquis RJ (1992) A bite is a bite is a bite? Constraints on response to folivory in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae). Ecology 73:143–152 Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19 McKey D (1974) Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. Am Nat 108:305–320 Messina FJ, Richards JH, McArther ED (1996) Variable responses of insects to hybrid versus parental sagebrush in common gardens. Oecologia 107:513–521 Molis M, Körner J, Ko YW, Kim JH, Wahl M (2006) Inducible responses in the blown seaweed Ecklonia cava: the role of grazer identity and season. J Ecol 94:243–249 R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org Shiojiri K, Karban R (2008) Seasonality of herbivory and communication between individuals of sagebrush. Arthropod Plant Interat 2:87–92 Stamp N (2003) Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Q Rev Biol 78:23–55 Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185 Takahashi M, Huntly N (2010) Herbivorous insects reduced growth and reproduction of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate). Arthropod Plant Interat 4:257–266 Ton J, D’Alessandro M, Jourdie V, Jakab G, Karlen D, Held M, Mauch-Mani B, Turlings TCJ (2007) Priming by airborne signals boosts direct and indirect resistance in maize. Plant J 49:16–26 Welch BL (2005) Big sagebrush: a sea fragmented into lakes, ponds, and puddles. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-144. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Wiens JA, Cates RG, Rotenberry JT, Cobb N, Van Horne B, Redak RA (1991) Arthropod dynamics on sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata): effects of plant chemistry and avian predation. Ecol Monogr 61:299–321 Yamawo A, Suzuki N, Tagawa J, Hada Y (2012) Leaf aging promotes the shift in defence tractics in Mallotus japonicus from direct to indirect defence. J Ecol 100:802–809