Scientometric Instruments of Research Funding

Grebnev, A.N., Scientific information systems, Vestn. Udmurt. Gos. Univ.: Mat., 2003, pp. 99–106.

Lopatenko, A.S., Modern scientific information systems. Prospects of use, 2001. http://derpi.tuwien.ac.at/~andrei/CRIS_DOC.

Gordukalova, G.F., Bibliometry, scientometrics, and webometry: From the number of lines in Aristotle’s works, Nauchn. Period.: Probl. Resheniya, 2014, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 40–46.

Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.V., The role of bibliometry in assessing the research activity of science, Upr. Bol’shimi Sist.: Sb. Tr., 2013, no. 44, pp. 210–246.

Zemskov, A.I., Bibliometry: A view of the problem. Comparison of the level of citation of scientific articles in different countries, Nauchn. Tekh. Bibl., 2014, no. 9, pp. 22–44.

Ravenscroft, J., Liakata, M., Clare, A., and Duma, D., Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements, PloS One, 2017, vol 12, no. 3, p. e0173152.

Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Thelwail, M., and López-Cózar, E.M., Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?, Scientometrics, 2017, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 443–460.

Stephan, P., Veugelers, R., and Wang, J., Blinkered by bibliometrics, Nature, 2017, vol. 544, no. 7651, pp. 411–412.

Gokhberg, L.M. and Sagieva, G.S., Russian science: Bibliometric indicators, Forsait, 2007, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–53.

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffmann, A., and Giovannini, E., Handbook on constructing composite indicators, OECD Stat. Work. Pap., 2005, vol.3.

Balyshev, A.V., Petrovskii, A.B., Roizenzon, G.V., and Tikhonov, I.P., Methodological approaches to the multicriteria evaluation of the examination of projects in scientific foundations, 2012. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mnogokriterialnyy-podhod-k-otsenkerezultativnosti-nauchnyh-proektov.

Gläser, J., Glänzel, W., and Scharnhorst, A., Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science, Scientometrics, 2017, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 981–998.

Zadumkin, K.A and Kondakov, I.A., Nauchno-tekhnicheskii potentsial regiona: Otsenka sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya (Scientific and Technical Potential of the Region: Assessment of the State and Development Prospects), Vologda: ISERT RAN, 2010.

Golovina, O.D., Theoretical aspects of the scientific and technological development of the national economy, Vestn. Udmurt Univ., Ser. Ekon. Pravo, 2005, no. 3, pp. 21–26.

Zolotukhina, A.V. and Frants, M.V., The estimating and forecasting model of scientific and technical potential of the region, Ekon. Reg., 2012, no. 1, pp. 211–221.

Morris, S.A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., and Asnake, B., Time line visualization of research fronts, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2003, vol. 54, no. 5, P, pp. 413–422.

Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., and Takeda, Y., Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 571–580.

Blaginin, V.A. and Matveeva, A.I., Research fronts: The strategic Imperative for the development of russian science, Mosk. Ekon. Zh., 2016, no. 4, p.54.

Lucio-Arias, D. and Leydesdorff, L., An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 2488–2498.

Rykova, I.N., Assessment of the scientific and technical potential of economic development on the basis of measuring public activity in priority areas of science and technology, Ekon. Sist., 2014, no. 2, pp. 22–26.

Sokolov, A.V., Foresight: A look into the future, Forsait, 2007, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–15.

Sokolov, A.V., The method of critical technologies, Forsait, 2007, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 64–74.