Science and Technology Education in the STES Context in Primary Schools: What Should It Take?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
AAAS (2010) Project 2061’s. Using Atlas of Science Literacy. http://www.project2061.org.atlas
Barak M, Ben-Chaim D, Zoller U (2007) Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: a case of critical thinking. Res Sci Edu 37:353–369
Ben-Chaim D, Barak M, Lubezky A, Zoller U (2008) College science students’ ability to resolve chemistry problems requiring higher-order-cognitive skills. J Res Sci Teach (Submitted)
Brady M (2008) Cover the material—or teach students to think? Teach Stud Think 65(5):64–67
Bunce DM (2009) Teaching is more than lecturing and learning is more than more than memorizing. J Chem Edu 86(6):674–680
Bybee R, McCrae B, Laurie R (2009) PISA 2006: an assessment of scientific literary. J Res Sci Edu 46(8):865–883
Chen D, Novick R (1996) MABAT: toward scientific and technological literacy: the national primary science curriculum in Israel. In: Mioduser D, Zilberstein I (eds) The 2nd Jerusalem international science and technology education conference (JISTEC ‘96)—book of abstracts. CET, CP-19, Jerusalem
Connonly P (2009) The challenges and prospects for educational effectiveness research. Effect Edu 1(1):1–12
Dori Y, Herskovitz O (1999) Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method; analysis of environmental case study. J Res Sci Teach 36(4):411–430
Fensham PJ (2009) Real world contexts in PISA science: implications for context-based science education. J Res Sci Teach 46(8):884–896
Gatt S (2000) Problem solving in primary science. Primary Sci Rev. 8–10 Jan/Feb
Gibbons M, Nowotny HJT (2001) The potential of transdisciplinarity. In: Thompson Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RM, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 67–80
Hodson D (2003) Time for action: science education for the alternative future. Int J Sci Edu 25:645–670
Hodson D (2004) Going beyond STS: towards a curriculum for sociopolitical action. Sci Edu Rev 3(1):2–7
Hoolbrook J, Ranikmae M (2009) The meaning of scientific literacy. Int J Environ Sci Edu 4(3):275–288
Johnstone AH (2001) Can problem solving be taught? Univ Chem Edu 5:69–73
Jones-Wilson TM (2005) Teaching problem-solving skills without sacrificing course content. J College Sci Teach 35(1):42–46
Levy Nahum T, Azaiza I, Ben-Chaim D, Herscovitz O, Zoller U (2010) Does STES-oriented science education promote 10th-grade students’ decision capability? Int J Sci Edu 32(10):1315–1336
Malamitsa K, Kasoutas M, Kokkotas P (2009) Developing Greek primary school students’ critical thinking through an approach of teaching science which incorporates aspects of history of science. Sci Educ 8(3–4):1–12
Mihelcic JR, Crittenden JC, Small MJ, Shonnard DR, Hokanson DR, Zhang Q, Chen H, Sorby SA, James VV, Sutherland JW, Schnoor JL (2003) Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ Sci Technol 37:5314–5324
Millar R (2006) Twenty first century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. Int J Sci Edu 28(13):1499–1521
NCATE (2010) Panel says Ed. Schools overlook development science. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/10/05/07develope.h30.html?tkn=SSKFEhn2HWN70yojMIFjyEuiq08s.Jh9pKZyo&cmp=clp-edweek
New York Times (2009) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/30educ.html?-=1&emc=eta1
NSTA International Task Force (2005) Developing a worldview for science education in North America and across the globe. Final report. pp 1–9
PCAST (2009) Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education for Americans’ future. Executive report. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/president-obama-annonce-major
Smith KC, Nakhleh MB, Bretz SL (2010) An expanded framework of analyzing general chemistry exams. Chem Edu Res Pract 11:147–153
Tal RT, Dori YJ, Keiny S, Zoller U (2001) Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development: the STEMS project approach. Int J Sci Edu 23(3):247–262
Tomorrow 98 (1992) Report of the superior committee on science, mathematics and technology education in Israel–harari report. Ministry of Education (in Hebrew), Jerusalem
Wardle C (2004) Asking the right questions: developing children’s questioning skills and knowing how to answer!. Primary Sci Rev 83:11–13
Whitehurst GJ, Croft M (2009) Brown center of education policy. The Brookings Institution. http://www.brokings.edu/opinions/2009/1029_standards_whitehurts.aspx
Yager RE (1991) The constructivist learning model: towards real reform in science education. Sci Teach 58(6):52–57
Yager RE (1996) Science/technology/society as reform in science education. State University of New York Press, Albany
Zoabi M, Zoller U (2010) The relevance of science and technology teaching to primary school education. The “Design Process” case in Israel. J Sci Edu Technol (submitted)
Zoller U (1987) The fostering of question-asking capability—a meaningful aspect of problem-solving in chemistry. J Chem Edu 64(6):510–512
Zoller U (1990) The IEE—an STS approach. J College Sci Teach 19(5):289–291
Zoller U (1991) Teaching/learning styles, performance and students’ teaching evaluation in STES-focused science education. A quasi-quantitative probe of a case study. J Res Sci Teach 28(7):593–607
Zoller U (1992) Faculty teaching performance evaluation in higher science education: issues and implications (a ‘cross-cultural’ case study). Sci Edu 76(6):673–684
Zoller U (1993) Lecture and learning: are they compatible? Maybe for LOCS; unlikely for HOCS. J Chem Edu 70(3):195–197
Zoller U (1996) The development of students HOCS—the key to progress in STES education. Bull Sci Technol Soci 16(5–6):268–272
Zoller U (1998) Eshnav Le-Matas. University of Haifa, Oranim (in Hebrew)
Zoller U (1999) Scaling-up of higher order cognitive skill oriented college chemistry teaching: an action-oriented research. J Res Sci Teach 36(5):583–596
Zoller U (2000a) Teaching tomorrow’s college science courses—are we getting it right? J College Sci Teach 29(6):409–414
Zoller U (2000b) Environmental chemistry: the disciplinary/correction-transdisciplinary prevention paradigm shift. Environ Sci Pollut Res 7(2):63–65
Zoller U (2001) The challenge for environmental chemistry educators. Environ Sci Pollut Res 8(1):1–4
Zoller U (2004) From algorithmic LOCS teaching to HOCS learning paradigm shift: What does/should it take in practice-oriented research in STES education. In: Ralle B, Eilks I (eds) Proceedings of the 17th symposium on chemical education: quality in practice-oriented research in science education. Dortmund. pp 125–135
Zoller U, Ben-Chaim D (1997) Students’ self-assessment in HOCS science examina-tions; is there a problem? J Sci Educ Technol 7(2):135–147
Zoller U, Levy Nahum T (2011) From teaching to ‘know’-to learning to ‘think’ in science education. The LOCS- to-HOCS paradigm shift: ‘how to do it’? In: Fraser B, Tobin K, Mcrobbie CD (eds) Handbook of science education, 2nd edn. Springer (In Press)
Zoller U, Pushkin D (2007) Matching higher order cognitive skills (HOCS)-promoting goal with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chem Edu Res Pract 8(2):153–171
Zoller U, Scholz RW (2004) The HOCS paradigm shift from disciplinary knowledge (LOCS) to interdisciplinary evaluative system thinking (HOCS): what should it take in science-technology-environment-society-oriented courses, curricula and assessment? Water Sci Technol 49(8):27–36
Zoller U, Nakhleh MB, Dori J, Lubezki A, Tessier B (1995) Success on algorithmic and LOCS versus conceptual chemistry exam questions. J Chem Edu 72(11):987–989