Scale-Invariance and Turbulence Models for Large-Eddy Simulation

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics - Tập 32 Số 1 - Trang 1-32 - 2000
Charles Meneveau1, Joseph Katz1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Environmental and Applied Fluid Mechanics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218;

Tóm tắt

▪ Abstract  Relationships between small and large scales of motion in turbulent flows are of much interest in large-eddy simulation of turbulence, in which small scales are not explicitly resolved and must be modeled. This paper reviews models that are based on scale-invariance properties of high-Reynolds-number turbulence in the inertial range. The review starts with the Smagorinsky model, but the focus is on dynamic and similarity subgrid models and on evaluating how well these models reproduce the true impact of the small scales on large-scale physics and how they perform in numerical simulations. Various criteria to evaluate the model performance are discussed, including the so-called a posteriori and a priori studies based on direct numerical simulation and experimental data. Issues are addressed mainly in the context of canonical, incompressible flows, but extensions to scalar-transport, compressible, and reacting flows are also mentioned. Other recent modeling approaches are briefly introduced.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adrian RJ. 1990. Stochastic estimation of subgrid scale motions.Appl. Mech. Rev.43:S214–>18

Akhavan R, Ansari A, Kang S, Mangiavacchi N. 1999. Subgrid-scale interactions in a numerically simulated planar turbulent jet and implications for modeling.J. Fluid Mech.Submitted

10.1017/S0022112096002479

Anderson R, Meneveau C. 1999. Effects of the similarity model in finite-difference LES of isotropic turbulence using a Lagrangian dynamic mixed model.Flow, Turbu. & Comb.62:201–225

10.1007/BF00312363

10.2514/3.13200

Bardina J, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC. 1980. Improved subgrid scale models for large-eddy simulation.Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Pap. 80-1357

10.1364/AO.33.007159

10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00075-1

10.1017/S0022112093002988

Benzi R, Ciliberto S, Tripiccione R, Baudet C, Massaioli F, Succi S. 1993. Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows.Phys. Rev. E48:R29–32

1993, Nonlinearity, 7, 313

10.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543

Bernal LP, Roshko A. 1986. Streamwise vortex structure in plane mixing layers.J. Fluid Mech.170:499–525

10.1017/S0022112097008306

10.1063/1.862705

Canuto VM, Cheng Y. 1997. Determination of the Smagorinsky-Lilly constantcs.Phys. Fluids7:1368–78

Carati D, Wray A, Cabot W. 1996. Ensemble averaged dynamic modeling. InProc. Summer Program, 1994, Cent. Turbul. Res., Stanford Univ., CAV:237–48

10.1063/1.868585

Carati D, Jansen K, Lund TS. 1995b. A family of dynamic models for large-eddy simulation.Ann. Res. Briefs, Cent. Turbul. Res., NASA Ames/Stanford,CA, pp. 35–40

10.1063/1.869615

Cerutti S, Meneveau C. 1999. Hot-wire array for turbulence research in subgrid-scale modeling. InProc. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Fluids Eng., FEDSM99-7349

10.1063/1.857878

10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<2747:POSSOT>2.0.CO;2

10.1073/pnas.95.8.4094

10.1017/S002211207900001X

10.1063/1.869537

10.1063/1.869271

10.1063/1.868111

Dahm WJA, Southerland KB, Buch KA. 1991. Direct, high-resolution, four-dimensional measurements of the fine scale structure ofSc≫ 1 molecular mixing in turbulent flows.Phys. Fluids A3:1115–1127

10.1023/A:1001179014517

10.1007/BF00224974

DesJardin PE, Frankel SH. 1998. Large eddy simulation of a nonpremixed reacting jet: Application and assessment of subgrid-scale combustion models.Phys. Fluids10:2298–314

10.1063/1.858850

10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.547

10.1063/1.869170

10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00191-1

10.1017/S0022112092001678

Eyink GL. 1996. The multifractal model of turbulence and a priori estimates in LES, I and II.Cent. for Nonlinear Studies Archive,9602018, 9602019, Los Alamos, NM

10.1063/1.870080

Frisch U. 1995.Turbulence, the legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press

10.1063/1.869254

10.1063/1.858617

10.1063/1.865568

Germano M. 1992. Turbulence: the filtering approach.J. Fluid Mech.238:325–36

10.1063/1.857955

10.1006/jcph.1996.0088

10.1017/S0022112095000711

10.1006/jcph.1995.1077

10.1063/1.869289

Gopalan S, Katz J, Knio OM. 1999. The flow structure in the near field of jets and its effect on cavitation inception.J. Fluid Mech.In press

10.1063/1.868137

Haworth DC, Jansen K. 1999. LES on unstructured deforming meshes: towards reciprocating IC engines.Comput. FluidsIn press

10.1063/1.869454

10.1017/S0022112086001192

10.1063/1.869517

10.1063/1.869696

10.1006/jcph.1998.6112

10.1103/PhysRevE.49.5179

10.1080/00102208808923995

10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0710:TDBASI>2.0.CO;2

Kolmogorov AN. 1941. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number.C.R. Acad. Sci.USSR 30:301

10.1017/S0022112096004697

10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1521:EVITAT>2.0.CO;2

10.1006/jcph.1996.5597

Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. 1980.Statistical Physics.New York: Pergamon

Langford J, Moser RD. 1999. Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence.J. Fluid Mech.In press

Leith CE. 1990. Stochastic backscatter in a subgrid-scale model: plane shear mixing layer.Phys. Fluids A2:297–99

10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60464-1

Leonard A. 1997. Large-eddy simulation of chaotic convection and beyond.Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Pap. 97-0204:1–8

Lesieur M. 1997.Turbulence in Fluids.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 3rd ed.

10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.000401

10.1017/S0022112079000045

Lilly DK. 1967. The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. InProc. IBM Scientific Computing Symp. Environ. Sci.p. 195

10.1063/1.858280

10.1063/1.869048

10.1017/S0022112099004504

10.1017/S0022112094002296

10.1007/BF00849115

Lund TS, Novikov EA. 1992. Parametrization of subgrid-scale stress by the velocity gradient tensor. InCent. for Turbulence Res., Annu. Res. Briefs, Stanford Univ.1992:27

Lund TS, Kaltenbach H-J. 1995. Experiments with explicit filtering for LES using a finite-difference method.Cent. for Turbulence Res., Annu. Res. Briefs, Stanford Univ. 1995:91–105

10.1006/jcph.1998.5882

10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3411

Mansfield J, Knio OM, Meneveau C. 1998. A dynamic LES scheme for the vorticity transport equation: formulation anda-prioritests.J. Comp. Phys.145:693–730

10.1006/jcph.1999.6258

Mason PJ. 1994. Large-eddy simulation: a critical review of the technique.QJR Meteorol. Soc.120:1

10.1017/S0022112092002271

McComb WD. 1990.The Physics of Fluid Turbulence.Oxford, UK: Oxford Sci. Publ.

10.2514/3.61313

McMillan OJ, Ferzinger JH, Rogallo RS. 1980. Tests of new subgrid scale models in strained turbulence.Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Pap. 801339

10.1017/S0022112091003786

Meneveau C. 1994. Statistics of turbulence subgrid-scale stresses: Necessary conditions and experimental tests.Phys. Fluids A6:815–33

10.1063/1.869873

10.1063/1.870094

10.1017/S0022112096007379

10.1063/1.869493

10.1103/PhysRevE.49.2866

10.1063/1.868741

10.1016/0045-7930(95)00036-4

10.1017/S0022112092004361

10.1063/1.869361

10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<2052:ALESMF>2.0.CO;2

10.1017/S0022112082001116

10.1063/1.858164

10.1063/1.868978

10.1063/1.868887

10.1017/S0022112097006885

10.1063/1.858586

10.1063/1.857956

10.1063/1.869385

10.1063/1.868607

10.1063/1.866635

10.1063/1.868829

10.1016/0010-4655(91)90175-K

10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4

Pope SB. 1990. Computations of Turbulent combustion: progress and challenges.23rd Symp. Int. on Combustion. Combustion Inst.pp. 519–612

Pope SB. 2000.Turbulent Flows.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press

10.1023/A:1001521504466

Porté-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange MB. 1998b. A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to the atmospheric boundary layer.J. Fluid Mech.Submitted

Porté-Agel F, Parlange MB, Meneveau C, Eichinger WE, Pahlow M. 1999. Subgrid-scale dissipation in the atmospheric surface layer: Effects of stability and filter dimension.J. Hydrometeorol.In press

10.1063/1.858798

10.1063/1.868999

Richardson. LF. 1922.Weather Prediction by Numerical Process.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press

Rodi W, Ferziger JH, Breuer M, Pourquie M. 1997. Status of large eddy simulation: results of a workshop.J. Fluids Eng.T ASME,119:248–62

10.1146/annurev.fl.16.010184.000531

10.1017/S0022112094001370

10.1063/1.868779

10.1063/1.870021

10.1016/0021-9991(75)90093-5

10.1098/rspa.1995.0126

10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.867

10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00266-8

10.1063/1.869306

10.1063/1.858537

10.1063/1.869895

10.1007/BF02033994

Shtilman L, Chasnov JR. 1992. LES vs. DNS: a comparative study.In Proc. Summer Program, Cent. Turbul. Res., Stanford Univ.3:137

Sinha M, Katz J, Meneveau C. 1999. Quantitative visualization of the flow in a centrifugal pump with diffuser vanes. Part B: Addressing passage-averaged and LES modeling issues in turbomachinery flows.J. Fluids Eng.Submitted

Smagorinsky J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment.Mon. Weather Rev.91:99

10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.275

10.1017/S0022112085001987

10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.000543

10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.002543

10.1063/1.868656

10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.435

Tao B, Katz J, Meneveau C. 1999. Applications of HPIV data of turbulent duct flow for turbulence modeling,Proc. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Pap. FEDSM99-7281

Tong C, Wyngaard JC, Khanna S, Brasseur JG. 1998. Resolvable- and subgrid-scale measurements in the atmospheric surface layer: technique and issues.J. Atmos. Sci.55:3114–26

10.1017/S0022112091001957

10.1007/BF00312367

10.1063/1.868333

10.1017/S0022112094003745

10.1007/BF00849116

10.1017/S0022112097005429

10.1063/1.868911

Winckelmans GS, Wray AA, Vasilyev OV. 1998. Testing of a new mixed model for LES: the Leonard model supplemented by a dynamic Smagorinsky term.In Proc. Summer Program VII, Cent. Turbul. Research, Stanford Univ.

10.2514/2.64

10.1017/S0022112098008982

10.1007/BF01061499

10.1063/1.858675

10.1007/s003480050124

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Tập 32 Số 1

1-32

Thông tin tác giả