Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler M.D. (2000) Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 1363–1501
Davis M. (1991) Punishment as Language: Misleading Analogy for Desert Theorists. Law and Philosophy 10: 311–322
Duff R.A. (2001) Punishment, Communication and Community. New York: Oxford University Press
Duff R.A. (1992) Alternatives to Punishment – or Alternative Punishments? In: W. Cragg (eds.) Retributivism and Its Critics. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner
Golash D. (2005) The Case Against Punishment. New York: New York University Press
Hampton, J., ‹An Expressive Theory of Retribution’, in W. Cragg (ed.), Retributivism and Its Critics. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1992a), 1–25
Hampton J. (1992b) Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution. UCLA Law Review 39: 1659–702
Hampton, J., ‹The Retributive Idea’, in J.G. Murphy and J. Hampton (eds.), Forgiveness and Mercy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 111–161
Hart, H.L.A., ‹Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60 (1959): 1–26, reprinted in H.L.A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), 1–27
von Hirsch A. (1993) Censure and Sanctions. New York: Oxford University Press
Narayan U. (1993) Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13: 166–82
Nozick R. (1981) Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Primoratz, I. (1989a) Justifying Legal Punishment. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International
Sayre-McCord G. (2001) Criminal Justice and Legal Reparations as an Alternative to Punishment. Philosophical Issues 11: 502–529
Scanlon, T., ‹The Significance of Choice’, in S. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. viii (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988), 151–216