Satisfaction with Firm Performance in Family Businesses

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice - Tập 34 Số 5 - Trang 985-1002 - 2010
Raj V. Mahto1, Peter Davis2, John A. Pearce3, Richard B. Robinson4
1Anderson School of Management, The University of New Mexico.
2Department of Management, Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina Charlotte.
3Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship at the Villanova School of Business, Villanova University.
4Department of Management, Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina.

Tóm tắt

Business goals in family businesses are often subsumed by family goals. As a result, reference performance for each family business is different. This makes the popular financial performance measure of publicly traded companies, profit maximization, insufficient for family businesses. We believe that for evaluating family businesses, the family members‘ satisfaction with firm performance is a better measure of performance. In the study, we identify three predictors of family members‘ satisfaction with firm performance and test the proposed linkages on two samples of family businesses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.5465/AMR.2000.2791600

10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00032-7

10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1014

10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.980

10.1177/002224379202900103

10.1007/978-1-4899-6056-6_1

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00121.x

ArregleJ.L., HittM.A., SirmonD. & VeryP. (2005). The development of organizational social capital and its performance implications: Insights from family firms. Unpublished manuscript, Australian Graduate School of Management.

10.2307/258189

10.1007/978-94-009-2792-6_2

10.2307/255959

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)18:3<297::AID-JOB805>3.0.CO;2-D

10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

10.1002/smj.4250110705

10.1111/1467-8551.0045

10.2307/2786653

10.4135/9781446218617

10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2

10.1080/03585522.1999.10419802

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x

10.1177/104225879902300402

10.1016/0883-9026(95)00083-K

10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.512

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00253.x

10.1509/jmkg.68.1.128.24034

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1990.00225.x

10.1177/002224378101800104

Gersick K.E., 1997, Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business

10.2189/asqu.52.1.106

10.2307/30040616

10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.08.006

10.2307/258434

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00159.x

Hogg M.A., 1988, Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes

Hom P.W., 1995, Employee turnover

10.1080/10705519909540118

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02419.x

Joreskog K., 1983, LISREL V: User's guide

Joreskog K.G., 1984, LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood

Joreskog K.G., 1993, LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language

Kets de Vries M.F.R., 1995, Family business: Human dilemmas in the family firm

Kuratko D.F., 1997, Journal of Small Business Management, 35, 24

10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

MahtoR.V., AmesM. & KhaninD. (2007). How to enhance successors‘ commitment to inherited family business. Paper presented at Academy of Management Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171

10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

10.4135/9781452231556

10.1509/jmkg.67.2.1.18607

10.1037/h0037335

10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.417

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00007.x

10.1002/job.141

Rosenblatt P.C., 1985, The family in business

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00001.x

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00015-6

10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013

10.2307/256375

10.2307/2392457

10.2307/2695870

10.2307/256474

10.1002/smj.4250140605