Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision

Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828

Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482

Kaufmann D, Lauscher JC, Gröne J et al (2017) CT-based measurement of the inner pelvic volume. Acta Radiol 58(2):218–223

Moureaux C, Boucaud-Maitre D, Brureau L et al (2018) Pelvimetrics measures as predictives factors of positives surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Prog Urol 28(16):906–914

Yao A, Iwamoto H, Masago T et al (2015) Anatomical dimensions using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging: impact on the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 22(1):74–79

Zur Hausen G, Gröne J, Kaufmann D et al (2017) Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(8):1125–1135

Ferko A, Malý O, Örhalmi J, Dolejš J (2016) CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 30(3):1164–1171

Bertani E, Chiappa A, Della Vigna P et al (2014) The Impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 61(134):1574–1581

Atasoy G, Arslan NC, Elibol FD, Sagol O, Obuz F, Sokmen S (2018) Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer. Surg Today 48(12):1040–1051

Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2009) Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 146(3):483–489

Shimada T, Tsuruta M, Hasegawa H et al (2018) Pelvic inlet shape measured by three-dimensional pelvimetry is a predictor of the operative time in the anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surg Today 48(1):51–57

Yan HH, Lou Z, Sheng J, Zhang W, Fu CG, Meng RG (2011) Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 14(11):846–850

Zhou XC, Su M, Hu KQ et al (2016) CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer. Oncol Lett 11(1):31–38

Yamamoto T, Kawada K, Kiyasu Y, Itatani Y, Mizuno R, Hida K et al (2020) Prediction of surgical difficulty in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer by use of MRI pelvimetry. BJS Open 28:46

Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, Fukuda M, Ikai I, Yamato T, Sakai Y (2011) Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: “narrow pelvis” is not a contraindication. Surg Endosc 25(6):1907–1912

Wagner D, Kamer L, Sawaguchi T, Richards RG, Noser H, Hofmann A et al (2017) Morphometry of the sacrum and its implication on trans-sacral corridors using a computed tomography data-based three-dimensional statistical model. Spine J 17(8):1141–1147