SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

BMJ Quality and Safety - Tập 25 Số 12 - Trang 986-992 - 2016
Greg Ogrinc1,2,3, Louise Davies1,2,3, Daisy Goodman1,3, Paul B. Batalden1,2, Frank Davidoff2, David Stevens4,2
1Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
2The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
3White River Junction VA Medical Center
4Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Tóm tắt

Since the publication of Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript, we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015 using (1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group, (2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasises the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value and safety of healthcare: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve healthcare, recognising that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (http://www.squire-statement.org).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/qshc.2005.014787

DeVinney B , ed. Expanding Research and Evaluation Designs to Improve the Science Base for Health Care and Public Health Quality Improvement Symposium. Washington DC: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Conference Summary, 15 Sep 2005.

10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138

10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x

10.1136/qshc.2008.028423

10.1136/qshc.2008.029066

10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.103

Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2011.

Teaching for Quality. 2013. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cei/te4q/ (accessed 21 Jun 2013).

10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006

10.1056/NEJMsr1200117

10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627

Bate P , Robert G , Fulop N , et al . Perspectives on context. London: The Health Foundation, 2014.

10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010

10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045955

10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049379

Hoffmann, 2014, Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide, BMJ, 348, 1, 10.1136/bmj.g1687

10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620

Davies, 2015, The SQUIRE guidelines: an evaluation from the field, 5 years post release, BMJ Qual Saf, 24, 765, 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004116

10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003737

10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004158

Davies, 2015, Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: User road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0, BMJ Qual Saf, 25, 265, 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117

Day, 1989, The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format, J Am Med Writers Assoc, 4, 16

Huth E . Writing and publishing in medicine. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1999.

Baily, 2006, Special report: the ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety, Hastings Center Rep, 34, s1, 10.1353/hcr.2006.0054

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

BMJ Quality and Safety

Tập 25 Số 12

986-992

Thông tin tác giả