Role of the Prostate Imaging Quality PI-QUAL Score for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Image Quality in Pathological Upstaging After Radical Prostatectomy: A Multicentre European Study

Mottet, 2021, EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent, Eur Urol, 79, 243, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042 Kasivisvanathan, 2018, MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis, N Engl J Med, 378, 1767, 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993 Turkbey, 2019, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1: 2019 update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2, Eur Urol, 76, 340, 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033 Burn, 2019, A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards, Clin Radiol, 74, 894.e19, 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.026 Sackett, 2021, Quality of prostate MRI: is the PI-RADS standard sufficient?, Acad Radiol, 28, 199, 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.031 Giganti, 2020, Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial, Eur Urol Oncol, 3, 615, 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.007 de Rooij, 2016, Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 70, 233, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.029 Gatti, 2022, mEPE-score: a comprehensive grading system for predicting pathologic extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, Eur Radiol, 32, 4942, 10.1007/s00330-022-08595-9 Dinneen, 2022, Negative mpMRI rules out extra-prostatic extension in prostate cancer before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Diagnostics, 12, 1057, 10.3390/diagnostics12051057 de Rooij, 2020, ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists’ training, Eur Radiol, 30, 5404, 10.1007/s00330-020-06929-z Pesapane, 2020, T-staging of prostate cancer: identification of useful signs to standardize detection of posterolateral extraprostatic extension on prostate MRI, Clin Imaging, 59, 1, 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.08.007 Epstein, 2016, The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system, Am J Surg Pathol, 40, 244, 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530 Oerther, 2022, Cancer detection rates of the PI-RADSv2.1 assessment categories: systematic review and meta-analysis on lesion level and patient level, Prostate Cancer Prostat Dis, 25, 256, 10.1038/s41391-021-00417-1 Kornienko, 2022, Follow-up of men with a PI-RADS 4/5 lesion after negative MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy, Sci Rep, 12, 13603, 10.1038/s41598-022-17260-6 Giganti, 2022, Inter-reader agreement of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality in the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial, Eur Radiol, 32, 879, 10.1007/s00330-021-08169-1 Girometti, 2022, Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score: a bicentric study, Eur J Radiol, 150, 110267, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110267 Karanasios, 2022, Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up, Br J Radiol, 95, 20211372, 10.1259/bjr.20211372 Pötsch, 2022, Impact of PI-QUAL on PI-RADS and cancer yield in an MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy population, Eur J Radiol, 154, 110431, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110431 Barentsz, 2012, ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012, Eur Radiol, 22, 746, 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y Mehralivand, 2019, A grading system for the assessment of risk of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI, Radiology, 290, 709, 10.1148/radiol.2018181278