Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature

Geraghty R, Proietti S, Traxer O et al (2017) Worldwide impact of warmer seasons on the incidence of renal colic and kidney stone disease (KSD): evidence from a systematic review of literature. J Endourol 31(8):729–735

Rukin N, Siddiqui Z, Chedgy E et al (2017) Trends in upper tract stone disease in England: evidence from the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) Database. Urol Int 98(4):391–396

Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Geraghty R et al (2017) Trends of ‘Urolithiasis: interventions, Simulation and Laser technology’ over the last 16 years (2000–2015) as published in the literature (PubMed): a systematic review. WJU 35(11):1651–1658

Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482

Geraghty R, Burr J, Simmonds N et al (2015) Shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole and non-lower pole stones from a university teaching hospital: parallel group comparison during the same time period. Urol Ann 7(1):46–48

El-Assmy A, Abo-Elghar ME, El-Nahas AR et al (2008) Anatomic predictors of formation of lower caliceal calculi: is it the time for three-dimensional computed tomography urography? J Endourol 22(9):2175–2180

Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM et al (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159(3):676–682

Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H (1988) Long-term follow up in 1,003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 140(3):479–483

Burr J, Ishii H, Simmonds N et al (2015) Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: comparative outcomes from a University hospital over similar time period. Central Eur J Urology 68(2):183

Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis—initial results. J Urol 166(6):2072–2080

Raman JD, Pearle MS (2008) Management options for lower pole renal calculi. Curr Opin Urol 18(2):214–219

Sari S, Ozok HU, Topaloglu H et al (2017) The association of a number of anatomical factors with the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower calyceal stones. Urol J 14(4):4008–4014

Kilicarslan H, Kaynak Y, Kordan Y et al (2015) Unfavorable anatomical factors influencing the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi. Urol J 12(2):2065–2068

Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB et al (2012) The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology 79(1):61–66

Martin F, Hoarau N, Lebdai S et al (2014) Impact of lower pole calculi in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol 28(2):141–145

Jessen JP, Honeck P, Knoll T et al (2014) Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones: influence of the collecting system’s anatomy. J Endourol 28(2):146–151

Inoue T, Murota T, Okada S et al (2015) Influence of pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal stones. J Endourol 29(9):998–1005

Khan M, Lal M, Kash DP et al (2016) Anatomical factors predicting lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Afr J Urol 22(2):96–100

Manikandan R, Gall Z, Gunendran T et al (2007) Do anatomic factors pose a significant risk in the formation of lower pole stones? Urology 69(4):620–624

Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B (2008) Influence of pyelocaliceal anatomy on the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach. J Endourol 22(10):2235–2240

Ghosh A, Oliver R, Way C et al (2017) Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years. World J Urol 35(11):1757–1764

Somani BK, Desai M, Traxer O et al (2014) Stone free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR. Urolithiasis 42(2):95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0630-3

Corp IBM (2016) IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

Sampaio F, Mandarim-De-Lacerda C (1988) Anatomic classification of the kidney collecting system for endourologic procedures. J Endourol 2(3):247–251

Higgins J, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane book series. Wiley, Chichester

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

Ozimek T, Cordes J, Wiessmeyer J et al (2018) Steep infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) as a new risk factor for flexible ureteroscope damage and complicated postoperative course. Eur Urol Suppl 17(4):e2005

Wright A, Rukin N, Smith D et al (2016) ‘Mini, ultra, micro’–nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Ther Adv Urol 8(2):142–146

Jones P, Elmussareh M, Aboumarzouk O et al (2018) Role of minimally invasive (micro and ultra mini) PCNL for adult urinary stone disease in the modern era: evidence from a systematic review. Curr Urol Reports 19(4):27