Role of meiofauna in estuarine soft‐bottom habitats*
Tóm tắt
Meiofauna are ubiquitous in estuaries worldwide averaging 106 m−2. Abundance and species composition are controlled primarily by three physical factors: sediment particle size, temperature and salinity. While meiofauna are integral parts of estuarine food webs, the evidence that they are biologically controlled is equivocal. Top down (predation) control clearly does not regulate meiofaunal assemblages. Meiofauna reproduce so rapidly and are so abundant that predators cannot significantly reduce population size. Food quantity (bottom up control) also does not appear to limit meiofaunal abundance; there is little data on the effect of food quality. In estuarine sediments meiofauna: (i) facilitate biomineralization of organic matter and enhance nutrient regeneration; (ii) serve as food for a variety of higher trophic levels; and (iii) exhibit high sensitivity to anthropogenic inputs, making them excellent sentinels of estuarine pollution. Generally mineralization of organic matter is enhanced and bacterial production stimulated in the presence of meiofauna. Tannins from mangrove detritus in northern Queensland appear to inhibit meiofaunal abundance and therefore the role of meiofauna in breakdown of the leaves. Meiofauna, particularly copepods, are known foods for a variety of predators especially juvenile fish and the meiofaunal copepods are high in the essential fatty acids required by fish. The copepod’s fatty acid composition is like that of the microphytobenthos they eat; bacterial eaters (nematodes?) do not have the essential fatty acids necessary for fish. Most contaminants in estuaries reside in sediments, and meiofauna are intimately associated with sediments over their entire life‐cycle, thus they are increasingly being used as pollution sentinels. Australian estuarine meiofauna research has been concentrated in Queensland, the Hunter River estuarine system in New South Wales, and Victoria’s coastal lagoons. Studies in northern Queensland have primarily concentrated on the role of nematodes in mineralization of organic matter, whereas those from southern Queensland have concentrated on the role of meiofauna as food for fish and as bacterial grazers. The New South Wales studies have concentrated on the Hunter River estuary and on the structure and function of marine nematode communities. In Victoria, several fish have been shown to eat meiofauna. The Australian world of meiofaunal research has hardly been touched; there are innumerable opportunities for meiofaunal studies. In contaminated estuarine sediments reduced trophic coupling between meiofauna and juvenile fish is a basic ecological question of habitat suitability, but also a question with relevance to management of estuarine resources. Because meiofauna have short lifecycles, the effects of a contaminant on the entire life‐history can be assessed within a relatively short time. The use of modern molecular biology techniques to assess genetic diversity of meiofauna in contaminated
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aarnio K. E., 1991, Benthic predation on shallow‐water macro‐ and meiofauna in the Baltic Sea: an experimental comparison between Pomatoschistus minutus (Pisces) and Saduria entomon (Crustacea)., Ann. Zool. Fennici., 28, 41
Alongi D. M., 1987, The role of soft‐bottom benthic communities in tropical mangrove ecosystems., Rev. Aquat. Sci., 1, 243
Alongi D. M., 1989, Community dynamics of free‐living nematodes in some tropical mangrove and sandflat habitats., Bull. Mar. Sci., 46, 358
AryaP.(1988)Micrometerology.Academic Press NY.
BamstedtU.(1986) Chemical content and energy content. In:The Biological Chemistry of Marine Copepods.(eds E. D. S. Corner & C. M. O’Hara) pp. 1–58. Clarendon Press Oxford.
Bell S. S., 1981, Meiofauna–macrofauna interactions in a high salt marsh habitat., Ecol. Monogr., 46, 127
Carriker M. R., 1961, Interrelation of functional morphology, behavior and autecology in early stages of the bivalve Mercenaria mercenaria., J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 77, 168
CoullB. C.(1988) The ecology of the marine meiofauna. In:Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna(eds R. P. Higgins & H. Thiel) pp. 18–38 Smithsonian Institute Press Washington DC.
CoullB. C.&BellS. S.(1979) Perspectives of marine meiofaunal ecology. In:Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Ecosystems(ed. R. J. Livingston) pp. 189–216 Plenum NY.
Coull B. C., 1992, Pollution and meiofauna: field, laboratory and mesocosm studies., Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 30, 191
Cummins K. W., 1971, Caloric equivalents for investigations in ecological energetics., Int. Assoc. Theor. Appl. Limnol. Comm., 18, 1
DiPinto L. M., 1993, Lethal and sublethal effects of the sediment‐associated PCB Aroclor 1254 on a meiobenthic copepod., Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 12, 909, 10.1002/etc.5620121017
DiToro D. M., 1991, Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning., Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10, 1541, 10.1002/etc.5620101203
Escaravage V., 1990, The impact of the lagoonal shrimp Palaemonetes varians (Leach) on meiofauna in a temperate coastal impoundment., Acta Oecologia, 11, 409
Feller R. J., 1995, Non‐selective ingestion of meiobenthos by juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) and their daily ration., Vie Milieu, 45, 49
FindlayR. H.&DobbsF. C.(1993) Quantitative description of microbial communities using lipid analysis. In:Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology(eds P. F. Kemp B. F. Sherr E. B. Sherr & J. J. Cole) pp. 271–84 Lewis Publishers Boca Raton FL.
GiereO.(1993)Meiobenthology. the Microscopic Fauna in Aquatic Sediments.Springer‐Verlag Berlin.
Hedqvist‐Johnson K., 1991, The impact of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon L. on soft‐bottom meiofauna: an experimental approach., Ophelia, 34, 41, 10.1080/00785326.1991.10429705
Heip C., 1985, The ecology of marine nematodes., Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 23, 399
Hicks G. R. F., 1985, Biomass and production estimates for an estuarine meiobenthic copepod, with an instantaneous assessment of exploitation by flatfish predators., N.Z. J. Ecol., 8, 125
Hicks G. R. F., 1983, The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods., Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 21, 67
HigginsR. P.&ThielH.(1988)Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna.Smithsonian Institute Press Washington DC.
Hodda M., 1987, Free‐living nematodes from Darwin mangroves., The Beagle, Occ. Pap. North. Terr. Mus. Arts Sci., 4, 7
KanazawaA.(1985) Essential fatty acid and lipid requirements of fish. In:Nutrition and Feeding in Fish(eds C. B. Cowley A. M. Mackie & J. G. Bell) pp. 281–98 Academic Press NY.
KennedyV. S.(1984)The Estuary as a Filter.Proceedings 7th Biennial International Estuarine Research Conference. Academic Press NY.
KrusbergL. R.(1971) Chemical composition of nematodes. In: Plant Parasitic Nematodes. Vol. 2 Cytogenetics Host–Parasite Interactions and Physiology(eds B. M. Zuckerman W. F. Mai & R. A. Rhode) pp. 213–34 Academic Press NY.
MattilaJ. OlafssonE. R. JohanssonA.(1990) Predation effects of Crangon crangon benthic infauna of shallow sandy bottoms—an experimental study from southern Sweden. In:Trophic Relationships in the Marine Environment Proceedings 24th European Symposium Marine Biology(eds M. Barnes & R. N. Gibson) pp. 503–16. Aberdeen University of Press Aberdeen Scotland.
McCall J. N., 1995, Predation by juvenile fish on hyperbenthic meiofauna: a review with data on post‐larval Leiostomus xanthurus., Vie Milieu, 45, 61
Montagna P. A., 1995, Rates of metazoan meiofaunal microbivory: a review., Vie Milieu, 45, 1
Montagna P. A., 1995, Meiofaunal and microbial trophic interactions in a natural submarine hydrocarbon seep., Vie Milieu, 45, 17
MoriarityD. J. W. PollardP. C. AlongiD. M. WilkinsonC. R. GrayJ. S.(1985a) Bacterial Productivity and trophic relationships with consumers on a coral reef. In:Proceedings 5th International Coral Reef Congress(eds B. Delesalle C. Gabrie H. M Vivien) vol. 5 pp. 457–67. Antenne‐Museum‐Ephe Moorea French Polynesia.
Moriarity D. J. W., 1985, Productivity of bacteria and microalgae and the effect of grazing by holothurians on a coral reef flat., Mar. Biol., 49, 211
MoverlyJ. H. RitzD. A. GarlandC.(1995)Development and Testing of a Meiobenthic Mesocosm System for Ecotoxicological Experiments.National Pulp Mills Research Program Technical Report no. 14. CSIRO Canberra.
Peterson C. H., 1991, Intertidal zonation of marine invertebrates in mud and sand., Am. Sci., 79, 236
SoyerJ.(1985) Mediterranean Sea meiobenthos. In:Mediterranean Marine Ecosystems(eds M. Moraitou‐Apostolopoulou & V. Kiortsis) pp. 85–108 Plenum NY.
StottrupJ. G.(1993) First feeding in marine fish larvae— nutritional and environmental aspects. In:Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Fish Development(eds B. T. Walther & H. J. Fyhn) pp. 123–31 University of Bergen Press Bergen.
TenoreK. R.&RiceD. L.(1980) A review of trophic factors affecting secondary production of deposit‐feeders. In:Marine Benthic Dynamics(eds K. R. Tenore & B. C. Coull) pp. 325–40 University of South Carolina Press SC.
Tietjen J. H., 1980, Microbial‐meiofaunal interrelationships: a review., Microbiology, 1980, 335
Toepfer C. S., 1995, Diet of juvenile fishes Citharichthys spilopterus, Symphurus plagiusa, and Gobionellus bolesoma., Bull. Mar. Sci., 56, 238
Tseung W. Y., 1984, Studies on the culture of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus Mori and its value as a food for juveniles of the yellow‐fin sea bream (Acanthopagrus latus) (Houttuyn)., Crustaceana, 7, 381
Vilela M.‐H., 1992, Mass culture and nutritional quality of the marine copepod Tigriopus brevicornis Muller., Bol. Inst. Nac. Pescas, Lisboa, 17, 49
Wilson D. P., 1952, The influence of the nature of the substratum on the metamorphosis of the larvae of marine animals, especially the larvae of Ophelia bicornis Savigny., Annls. Inst. Oceanogr., 27, 49
Zander C. D., 1992, Feeding habits of Gobius auratus and other small‐sized benthic fish from the French Mediterranean coast under regard of some alternating parameters., Zool. Anz., 228, 220