Robust calculation of effective atomic numbers: The Auto‐Zeff software

Medical Physics - Tập 39 Số 4 - Trang 1769-1778 - 2012
M. L. Taylor1,2,3, R. L. Smith4, F. Dossing5, Rick Franich3
1Medical Physics, WBRC, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne 3000, Australia
2Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3000, Australia
3School of Applied Sciences and Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia
4School of Applied Sciences and Health Innovations Research Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia and Medical Physics, WBRC, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne 3000, Australia
5Cimbex Software, Holmegaard, Denmark

Tóm tắt

Purpose:The most appropriate method of evaluating the effective atomic number necessitates consideration of energy‐dependent behavior. Previously, this required quite laborious calculation, which is why many scientists revert to over‐simplistic power‐law methods. The purpose of this work is to develop user‐friendly software for the robust, energy‐dependent computation of effective atomic numbers relevant within the context of medical physics, superseding the commonly employed simplistic power law approaches.Method: Visual Basic was used to develop a GUI allowing the straightforward calculation of effective atomic numbers. Photon interaction cross section matrices are constructed for energies spanning 10 keV to 10 GeV and elementsZ = 1–100. Coefficients for composite media are constructed via linear additivity of the fractional constituents and contrasted against the precalculated matrices at each energy, thereby associating an effective atomic number through interpolation of adjacent cross section data. Uncertainties are of the order of 1–2%.Results: Auto‐Zeff allows rapid (∼0.6 s) calculation of effective atomic numbers for a range of predefined or user‐specified media, allowing estimation of radiological properties and comparison of different media (for instance assessment of water equivalence). The accuracy of Auto‐Zeff has been validated against numerous published theoretical and experimental predictions, demonstrating good agreement. The results also show that commonly employed power‐law approaches are inaccurate, even in their intended regime of applicability (i.e., photoelectric regime). Furthermore, comparing the effective atomic numbers of composite materials using power‐law approaches even in a relative fashion is shown to be inappropriate.Conclusion: Auto‐Zeff facilitates easy computation of effective atomic numbers as a function of energy, as well as average and spectral‐weighted means. The results are significantly more accurate than normal power‐law predictions. The software is freely available to interested readers, who are encouraged to contact the authors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/14786441308635052

Mayneord W., 1937, The significance of the Röntgen, Acta—Unio Internationalis Contra Cancrum, 2, 271

Kahn F., 2003, The Physics of Radiation Therapy

10.1007/BF03178587

Parthasaradhi K., 1968, Effective atomic numbers in compounds, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys., 6, 574

F.HubbellandS.Seltzer “Tables of x‐ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy‐absorption coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 substances of dosimetric interest ” NIST‐5632 (1995).

10.2307/3578607

10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4

J.Scofield “Theoretical photoionization cross sections from 1 to 1500 keV ” Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL‐51326 (1973).

10.1016/0092-640X(88)90044-7

10.1103/PhysRev.117.1017

10.1063/1.555593

Thomson J., 1906, Conduction of Electricity Through Gases

10.1063/1.555523

10.1007/BF01366453

10.1063/1.555629

Fuller E., 1976, Photonuclear Reactions

10.1103/RevModPhys.47.713

ICRU, 1989, Report No 44: Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement

10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/022

10.1016/j.nimb.2011.02.010

10.1016/S0969-806X(97)00089-3

10.1016/S0958-3947(01)00078-4

10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.10.007

10.1016/j.nima.2009.11.061

10.1103/PhysRevA.7.1912

10.1016/0883-2889(91)90093-G

10.1088/0953-4075/39/18/025

10.1016/0883-2889(92)90192-H

10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/N01

10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.048

10.4103/0971-6203.54853

10.1007/BF02704481

10.1016/S0168-583X(99)01100-3

10.1120/jacmp.v9i2.2761

10.1118/1.596325

10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00248-7

10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.04.046

10.1016/S0306-4549(99)00121-8

10.1006/ndsh.2003.0017

10.1006/ndsh.2001.0011

10.1016/j.nds.2009.08.002

10.1006/ndsh.1999.0013

10.1016/j.nds.2006.10.001

10.1006/ndsh.1998.0017

10.1006/ndsh.1996.0003

10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2238

10.1118/1.595680