Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info‐Gap Methods

Risk Analysis - Tập 32 Số 10 - Trang 1657-1672 - 2012
Jim W. Hall1, Robert J. Lempert2, Klaus Keller3, Andrew Hackbarth2, Christophe Mijere4, David McInerney5
1Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2RAND Corporation,
3Geosciences
4Institut Polytechnique de Grenoble#TAB#
5The University of Chicago,

Tóm tắt

This study compares two widely used approaches for robustness analysis of decision problems: the info‐gap method originally developed by Ben‐Haim and the robust decision making (RDM) approach originally developed by Lempert, Popper, and Bankes. The study uses each approach to evaluate alternative paths for climate‐altering greenhouse gas emissions given the potential for nonlinear threshold responses in the climate system, significant uncertainty about such a threshold response and a variety of other key parameters, as well as the ability to learn about any threshold responses over time. Info‐gap and RDM share many similarities. Both represent uncertainty as sets of multiple plausible futures, and both seek to identify robust strategies whose performance is insensitive to uncertainties. Yet they also exhibit important differences, as they arrange their analyses in different orders, treat losses and gains in different ways, and take different approaches to imprecise probabilistic information. The study finds that the two approaches reach similar but not identical policy recommendations and that their differing attributes raise important questions about their appropriate roles in decision support applications. The comparison not only improves understanding of these specific methods, it also suggests some broader insights into robustness approaches and a framework for comparing them.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1515/9781400831050

Alcamo J, 2008, Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis

Rosenhead J, 1990, Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict

Taleb NN, 2007, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable

National Research Council, 2009, Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate

Ben Haim Y, 2006, Info‐Gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty

Lempert RJ, 2003, Shaping the Next One Hundred Years : New Methods for Quantitative, Long‐Term Policy Analysis, 10.7249/MR1626

Hine D, 2010, Information gap analysis of flood model uncertainties and regional frequency analysis, Water Resources Research, 46

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01284.x

Groves DG, 2008, Lempert RJ. Planning for climate change in the inland empire: Southern California, Water Resources Impact, 10, 14

10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.007

Popper SW, 2009, Natural Gas and Israel's Energy Future: Near‐Term Decisions from a Strategic Perspective

Dixon L, 2007, The Federal Role in Terrorism Insurance: Evaluating Alternatives in an Uncertain World

Morgan MG, 2009, Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Decisionmaking

Alley RB, 2002, Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises

10.1016/j.jeem.2003.10.003

10.1007/s10584-006-9114-6

Schneider SH, 2007, Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change, 779

Lenton TM, 2008, Tipping elements in the earth's climate system, 1786

10.1007/s10584-011-0377-1

Nordhaus WD, 2008, A Question of Balance, 10.2307/j.ctt1npzkh

10.1038/42224

10.1007/978-3-642-61154-4

GNU. Available at:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl‐3.0.txt Accessed March 18 2012.

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00940.x

10.1108/14636680710727516

Lempert RJ, 2005, High Performance Government: Structure, Leadership, and Incentives

10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.002

10.1287/opre.41.3.435

10.1023/B:CLIM.0000037561.75281.b3

Watson SR, 1987, Decision Synthesis: Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis

10.1007/BF00162111

Savage LJ, 1954, The Foundation of Statistics

Groves DG, 2008, Presenting Uncertainty About Climate Change to Water Resource Managers–Summary of Workshops with the Inland Empire Utilities Agency

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199612)9:4<231::AID-BDM240>3.0.CO;2-L

10.1002/smj.4250140304

European Environmental Agency (EEA).Looking Back on Looking Forward: A Review of Evaluative Scenario Literature. Copenhagen:European Environmental Agency.Report No.: ISSN 1725‐2237.

van der Heijden K, 1996, Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation

10.1023/A:1008894516817

Groves DG, 2008, Preparing for an Uncertain Future Climate in the Inland Empire – Identifying Robust Water Management Strategies

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Risk Analysis

Tập 32 Số 10

1657-1672

Thông tin tác giả