Robotic surgery for bowel endometriosis: a multidisciplinary management of a complex entity
Tóm tắt
Bowel endometriosis impacts quality of life. Treatment requires complex surgical procedures with associated morbidity. Precision approach with robotic surgery leads to organ preservation. Bowel endometriosis requires a multidisciplinary management to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes of bowel endometriosis undergoing multidisciplinary planning and robotic surgery. Consecutive cases of multidisciplinary robotic bowel endometriosis procedures (January 2021–December 2022) were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database in a national endometriosis accredited centre. Patients were managed through a multidisciplinary setting including gynaecologists, colorectal robotic surgeons, and other specialists. Dyschezia (menstrual and non-cyclical) and quality of life were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 months) through validated questionnaires. Sixty-eight consecutive cases of robotic bowel endometriosis were included. Median age was 35.0 (30.2–42.0) years. Median body mass index was 24.0 (21.0–26.7) kg/m2. Procedures performed were 48 (70.6%) shavings, 11 (16.2%) deep shavings, 3 (4.4%) disc excisions, and 6 (8.8%) segmental resections. One (1.5%) patient required temporary stoma. Median operating time was 150 (120–180) min. There were no conversions/return to theatre postoperatively. Median endometriotic nodule size was 25.0 (15.5–40.0) mm. Two (2.9%) patients developed postoperative complications. Median length of postoperative stay was 2 (2–4) days. Median follow-up was 12 (7–17) months. One (1.5%) patient recurred. Median menstrual dyschezia score improved from 5.0 (2.0–8.0) to 1.0 (0.0–5.7). Median non-cyclical dyschezia significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 1.0 (0.0–5.7) to 0.0 (0.0–2.0). Median quality of life score improved from 52.5 (35.0–70.0) to 74.5 (60.0–80.0). Robotic multidisciplinary approach to bowel endometriosis provides good perioperative outcomes with improvement of dyschezia and quality of life.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ballweg ML (2004) Impact of endometriosis on women’s health: comparative historical data show that the earlier the onset, the more severe the disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:201–218
Hur C, Falcone T (2021) Robotic treatment of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 71:129–143
Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA (2020) Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 382:1244–1256
Nisolle M, Donnez J (1997) Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril 68:585–596
Cornillie FJ, Oosterlynck D, Lauweryns JM, Koninckx PR (1990) Deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis: histology and clinical significance. Fertil Steril 53:978–983
Abo C, Moatassim S, Marty N et al (2018) Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 109(172–8):e1
Veeraswamy A, Lewis M, Mann A, Kotikela S, Hajhosseini B, Nezhat C (2010) Extragenital endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:449–466
Garry R, Clayton R, Hawe J (2000) The effect of endometriosis and its radical laparoscopic excision on quality of life indicators. BJOG 107:44–54
Working group of ESGE, ESHRE and WES, Keckstein J, Becker CM et al (2020) Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2020:hoaa002.
Pereira RM, Zanatta A, Preti CD, de Paula FJ, da Motta EL, Serafini PC (2009) Should the gynecologist perform laparoscopic bowel resection to treat endometriosis? Results over 7 years in 168 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:472–479
Pandis GK, Saridogan E, Windsor AC, Gulumser C, Cohen CR, Cutner AS (2010) Short-term outcome of fertility-sparing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis performed in a tertiary referral center. Fertil Steril 93:39–45
Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD011031.
Ugwumadu L, Chakrabarti R, Williams-Brown E et al (2017) The role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Gynecol Surg 14:15
Ercoli A, D’Asta M, Fagotti A et al (2012) Robotic treatment of colorectal endometriosis: technique, feasibility and short-term results. Hum Reprod 27:722–726
Seracchioli R, Manuzzi L, Mabrouk M et al (2010) A multidisciplinary, minimally invasive approach for complicated deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 93(1007):e1-3
NICE (2023) NG73, Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Recommendations: 1.10 Surgical management, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng73/chapter/Recommendations—surgical-management. Accessed 31 Mar 2023
British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) Criteria for a BSGE recognised centre for laparoscopic treatment of women with recto-vaginal endometriosis. https://www.bsge.org.uk/requirements-to-be-a-bsge-accredited-centre/. Accessed 31 Mar 2023
Donnez O, Roman H (2017) Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril 108:931–942
Benlice C, Usta T, Ozkaynak A et al (2022) Robotic surgery for deep pelvic endometriosis with multidisciplinary approach: shaving, wedge resection, and segmental resection. Dis Colon Rectum 65:e816
Roman H (2018) Endometriosis surgery and preservation of fertility, what surgeons should know. J Visc Surg 155(Suppl 1):S31–S36
Catenacci M, Flyckt RL, Falcone T (2011) Robotics in reproductive surgery: strengths and limitations. Placenta 32(Suppl 3):S232–S237
Ferrero S, Alessandri F, Racca A, Leone Roberti Maggiore U (2015) Treatment of pain associated with deep endometriosis: alternatives and evidence. Fertil Steril 104:771–92.
Chouhan H, Shin J, Kim SH (2018) Is robotic rectal resection the preferred option for resectable cancer? Mini-invasive Surg 2:18
Kim JS, Piozzi GN, Kwak JM et al (2022) Quality of laparoscopic camera navigation in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an analysis of surgical videos through a video processing computer software. Int J Med Robot 18(4):e2393
Piozzi GN, Kim SH (2021) Robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technical controversies and a systematic review on the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Coloproctol 37:351–367
Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X et al (2017) Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 107:996–1002.e3.
Ferrier C, Le Gac M, Kolanska K et al (2022) Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a prospective cohort study. Int J Med Robot 18:e2382
Ercoli A, Bassi E, Ferrari S et al (2017) Robotic-assisted conservative excision of retrocervical-rectal deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:863–868
Gumber A, Mykoniatis I, Waqas A et al (2018) Portsmouth protocol for triple assessment of colorectal anastomosis in robotic surgery reduces anastomotic leak & reoperation rates in rectal cancer surgery. EJSO 44(Suppl 1):S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.496
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349
Kondo W, Bourdel N, Tamburro S et al (2011) Complications after surgery for deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. BJOG 118:292–298
Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Altieri M et al (2019) Surgical, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis in the gray zone: 13-year long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26:1110–1116
Balla A, Quaresima S, Subiela JD, Shalaby M, Petrella G, Sileri P (2018) Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:835–847
Roman H, FRIENDS group (French coloRectal Infiltrating ENDometriosis Study group). A national snapshot of the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and colon in France in (2015) A multicenter series of 1135 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2017(46):159–165
Nezhat C, Li A, Falik R et al (2018) Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:549–562
Bendifallah S, Roman H, Rubod C et al (2018) Impact of hospital and surgeon case volume on morbidity in colorectal endometriosis management: a plea to define criteria for expert centers. Surg Endosc 32:2003–2011
Bendifallah S, Vesale E, Darai E et al (2020) Recurrence after surgery for colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(441–51):e2
Mosbrucker C, Somani A, Dulemba J (2018) Visualization of endometriosis: comparative study of 3-dimensional robotic and 2-dimensional laparoscopic endoscopes. J Robot Surg 12:59–66
Hiltunen J, Eloranta ML, Lindgren A, Keski-Nisula L, Anttila M, Sallinen H (2021) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is a feasible method for resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis, especially in the rectosigmoid area. J Int Med Res 49:3000605211032788
Soto E, Catenacci M, Bedient C, Jelovsek JE, Falcone T (2016) Assessment of long-term bowel symptoms after segmental resection of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a matched cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:753–759