Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery—the Russian Experience.
Tóm tắt
Surgical procedures that involve working in small anatomical spaces can be successfully performed using robot-assisted surgery. We did a retrospective study of the results of 86 robot-assisted pancreatic operations performed in the Abdominal Department No.1 of the A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow. Seventy (81.4%) patients were female, and 16 (18.6%) were male; the average age was 49 (37; 59). The following robot-assisted surgeries were performed: 17 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 45 distal pancreatectomies, 16 tumor enucleations, 6 median resections, and 2 total duodenopancreatectomies. The duration of robot-assisted surgical operations varied depending on the extent of the surgery: for a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), it was 400 (360–550) min; for a distal pancreatectomy, it was 210 (180–250) min. Estimated blood loss in a PD was 200 (150–500) ml; in a distal pancreatectomy, it was 100 (50–300) ml. Conversions happened in 6 cases: 2 of them in PD and 4 in distal pancreatectomies. The postoperative length of stay was 15 ± 9 days and depended on the extent of the surgery. The maximum length (16 days) was after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomies (14–25), the minimum (12 days) after organ-preservation surgery (8; 15). Pancreatic fistula А and В occurred in 35 (40.7%) patients and hemorrhages in 6 (7.0%) cases; there were 2 cases of 30-day mortality (2.3%). Robotic assistance can be successfully used in pancreatic surgery. Robot-assisted procedures ensure the precision of lymphadenectomy and anastomoses formation, and the postoperative lengths of stay are more comfortable for patients due to minimal tissue injury. The use of the robot-assisted approach in pancreatic surgery does not guarantee that specific postoperative complications will not occur.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ho C-K, Kleeff J, Friess H, Büchler MW (2005) Complications of pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 7(2):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651820510028936
Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Cheow PC, Ong HS, Chan WH, Chow PK, Soo KC, Wong WK, Ooi LL (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.10.956
Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120:1051–1054
Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784
Giulianotti PС, Sbrana F, Bianco FM (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657
Boggi U, Signori S, de Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F (2013) Feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925
Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution. World J Surg 35:2739–2746
Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM (2012) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 26:2397–2402
Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DJ, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150(5):416–422
Kriger AG, Berelavichus SV, Gorin DS, Kaldarov AR, Karelskaya NA, Akhtanin EA (2015) Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. Khirurgiya 9:50–56. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2015950-56
Berelavichus SV, Titova NV, Kaldarov AR, Smirnov AV, Kriger AG (2017) Robot-assisted operations on the pancreas. Annaly Hirurgicheskoy Gepatologii 1:103–111
Del Chiaro M, Segersvärd R (2014) The state of the art of robotic pancreatectomy. Biomed Res Int 2014(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/920492
Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Coratti A, Desiderio J, Parisi A, Falconi M (2013) Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. Surg Oncol 22:201–207
Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, Swan RZ, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB (2015) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond. J Gastrointest Oncol 6(4):396–405
Balzano G, Bissolati M, Boggi U, Bassi C, Zerbi A, Falconi M (2014) A multicenter survey on distal pancreatectomy in Italy: results of minimally invasive technique and variability of perioperative pathways. Updat Surg 66:253–263
Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT (2014) Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 18:682–689
Ryan CE, Ross SB, Sukharamwala PB, Sadowitz BD, Wood TW, Rosemurgy AS (2015) Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy: a robotic or LESS approach. JSLS 19(1):e2014.00246. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00246