Robot Acceptance at Work: A Multilevel Analysis Based on 27 EU Countries

Siciliano B, Khatib O (2008) Introduction. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O (eds) Handbook of robotics. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–8 European Robotics Association (2015) World robotics. http://www.eu-nited.net/robotics/news-events/robotics-news/world-robotics-2015.html. Accessed 26 Sept 2017 Hagele M (2016) Robots conquer the world [turning point]. Robot Autom Mag 23:118–120 IFR (2015) World robotics 2015 service robots. International federation of robotics. http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/statistics. Accessed 27 Sept 2017 Rodriguez F (2012) The realities of robotic milking technology today. http://www.progressivedairy.com/topics/management/the-realities-of-robotic-milking-technology-today. Accessed 27 Sept 2017 Probst LL, Frideres L, Pedersen B, Caputi C (2015) Service innovation for smart industry: human–robot collaboration. European Commission, Luxembourg Acemoglu D (1999) Changes in unemployment and wage inequality: an alternative theory and some evidence. Am Econ Rev 89:1259–1278 Acemoglu D (2002) Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. J Econ Lit 40:7–72 Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane JR (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118:1279–1334 Fernández-Macías E (2012) Job polarization in Europe? Changes in the employment structure and job quality, 1995–2007. Work Occup 39(2):157–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411427078 Bowles J (2014) The computerisation of European jobs. http://bruegel.org/2014/07/the-computerisation-of-european-jobs/. Accessed 11 May 2017 Otway HJ, Von Winterfeldt D (1982) Beyond acceptable risk: on the social acceptability of technologies. Policy Sci 14:247–256 Huber D, Hebert M (2016) 2015 National robotics initiative PI meeting report. http://nri2015.ri.cmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2015-NRI-workshop-report.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2017 RRI Council (2015) Action plan for FY 2015. https://www.jmfrri.gr.jp/content/files/20150925_plan_eng.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2017 Horizon/2020 (2016) Robotics. European commission. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/robotics. Accessed 28 Sept 2017 Weng Y, Chen C, Sun C (2009) Toward the human–robot co-existence society: on safety intelligence for next generation robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0019-1 Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35:982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action control: from cognition to behavior. Springer, New York, pp 11–39 Malhotra Y, Galletta DF (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system science, pp 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1999.772658 Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46:186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 Marangunić N, Granić A (2015) Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers Access Inf 14:81–95 Frese M, Zapf D (1994) Action as the core of work psychology: a German approach. In: Triandis HC, Dunette MD, Hough LM (eds) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto, pp 271–346 Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers K (1997) The transtheoretical model of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds) Health behaviour and health education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 60–84 Ronen S, Shenkar O (1985) Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis. Acad Manag Rev 10:435–454 Inglehart R, Welzel C (2014) The WVS cultural map of the world. World value surveys. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSNewsShow.jsp?ID=192. Accessed 17 Dec 2017 Engelbrekt K, Nygren B (2014) Russia and Europe: building bridges, digging trenches. Routledge, New York de Graaf M, Ben Allouch S (2013) Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Rob Auton Syst 61:1476–1486 Waddell D, Sohal AS (1998) Resistance: a constructive tool for change management. Manag Decis 36(8):543–548 Heerink M (2011) Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. In: The sixth ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. Lausanne Louie WYG, McColl D, Nejat G (2014) Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assist Technol 26(3):140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2013.869703 Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T (2006) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction. AI Soc 20(2):138–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7 Katz JE, Halpern D (2014) Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected robot appearance. Behav Inf Technol 33(9):941–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.783115 Schyns B (2004) The influence of occupational self-efficacy on the relationship of leadership behavior and preparedness for occupational change. J Career Dev 30:247–261 Taipale S, Luca FD, Sarrica M, Fortunati L (2015) Robot shift from industrial production to social reproduction. In: Vincent J, Taipale S, Sapio B, Lugano G, Fortunati L (eds) Social robots from a human perspective. Springer, London, pp 11–24 Willcocks L, Lester S (1994) Evaluating the feasibility of information systems investments: recent UK evidence and new approaches. In: Willcocks L (ed) Information management. Springer, New York, pp 49–77 Brown SA, Venkatesh V (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Q 29:399–426 Chen NH, Huang CT (2016) Domestic technology adoption: comparison of innovation adoption models and moderators. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 26:177–190 Bartneck CT, Suzuki T, Kanda T, Nomura K (2007) The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI Soc 21:217–230 Li D, Rau PLP, Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: effects of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2:175–186 Yoo SJ, David Huang W (2011) Comparison of web 2.0 technology acceptance level based on cultural differences. J Educ Technol Soc 14(4):241–252 Berger T, Frey C (2016) Structural transformation in the OECD: digitalisation, deindustrialisation and the future of work. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. No. 193, OECD Publishing, Paris Saner M, Wallach W (2015) Technology unemployment, AI, and workplace standardization: the convergence argument. J Evol Technol 25(1):74–80 Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage, London Ashraf AN, Thongpapanl N, Auh S (2014) The application of the technology acceptance model under different cultural contexts: the case of online shopping adoption. Int J Mark Stud 22(3):68–93 Triandis H (1988) Collectivism v. individualism: a reconceptualisation of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology, cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition. In: Bagley C, Verma GK (eds) Personality, cognition and values: cross-cultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence. Macmillan, London, pp 60–95 Schepers J, Wetzels M (2007) A Meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf Manag 44:90–103 Eurobarometer data service (2017) Sampling and fieldwork. https://www.gesis.org/eurobarometer-data-service/survey-series/standard-special-eb/sampling-and-fieldwork. Accessed 22 Feb 2018 Eurobarometer (2016) Public attitudes towards robots. Gesis database. http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.12265 Accessed 15 Mar 2016 Schnall R, Bakken S (2011) Testing the technology acceptance model: HIV case managers’ intention to use a continuity of care record with context-specific links. Inform Health Soc Care 36(3):161–172 World Bank DataBank (2016) World development indicators database. http://databank.worldbank.org/data. Accessed 3 May 2016 Fernández-Macías E (2015) Job polarisation in Europe: are mid-skilled jobs disappearing? https://www.socialeurope.eu/2015/07/job-polarisation-in-europe-are-mid-skilled-jobs-disappearing. Accessed 28 Sept 2017 Brey PW, Reijers W, Rangi S, Toljan D, Romare J, Collste G (2015) International differences in ethical standards and in the interpretation of legal frameworks. http://satoriproject.eu/media/D3.2-Int-differences-in-ethical-standards.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2017 Inglehart R, Baker WE (2000) Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Am Sociol Rev 65:19–51 Hofstede G (2016) Country comparison database. https://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html. Accessed 28 Nov 2017 Breschi S, Tarasconi G (2013) The technological profile and specialization pattern of countries. https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/technological-specialization-of-countries.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2018 Veugelers R (2016) The European Union’s growing innovation divide. Bruegel policy contribution (08). http://bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pc_2016_08.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2018 International Trade Statistics (2015) World trade organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2015_e/its2015_e.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017 Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JYC, de Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human–robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(3):517–527