Risk of persistent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion after electrosurgical excisional treatment with positive margins: a meta-analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
2008, ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 99: management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology, Obstet Gynecol., 112, 1419, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318192497c
Lu CH, 2006, Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III, Obstet Gynecol., 107, 830, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206777.28541.fc
Tyler LN, 2007, Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease, Arch Pathol Lab Med., 131, 622, 10.5858/2007-131-622-SOMAEO
Park JY, 2007, Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer, Gynecol Oncol., 107, 39, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.014
Manchanda R, 2008, Effect of margin status on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence following LLETZ in women over 50 years, BJOG., 115, 1238, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01853.x
Ghaem-Maghami S, 2007, Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis, Lancet Oncol., 8, 985, 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70283-8
2006, Nomenclatura Brasileira para Laudos Cervicais e Condutas Preconizadas: recomendações para profissionais de saúde [Brazilian Nomenclature for Cervical Cytology Reports and Guidelines], J Bras Patol Med Lab., 42, 351
van Hamont D, 2006, Long-term follow-up after large-loop excision of the transformation zone: evaluation of 22 years treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Int J Gynecol Cancer., 16, 615, 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00404.x
Moher D, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med., 6, e1000097, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Stroup DF, 2000, Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group, JAMA., 283, 2008, 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Luesley D, 2010
Wright TC Jr, 2007, 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ, Am J Obstet Gynecol., 197, 340, 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.050
Grimes DA, 2002, Bias and causal associations in observational research, Lancet., 359, 248, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2
Sacket DL, 2003, Prognóstico, 109
Petitti DB, 2000, Statistical methods in meta-analysis, 94
Chang DY, 1996, Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens, Gynecol Oncol., 63, 53, 10.1006/gyno.1996.0277
Goya-Canino MM, 2006, Follow-up of high risk intraepithelial lesions after loop excision, Prog Obstet Ginecol., 49, 72
Gardeil F, 1997, Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III, Obstet Gynecol., 89, 419, 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00505-4
Verguts J, 2006, Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation, BJOG., 113, 1303, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01063.x
Bodner K, 2002, Is therapeutic conization sufficient to eliminate a high-risk HPV infection of the uterine cervix?: A clinicopathological analysis, Anticancer Res., 22, 3733
Fletcher RW, 2006, Revisões sistemáticas, 240