Risk of metabolic syndrome and its components in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

World Psychiatry - Tập 14 Số 3 - Trang 339-347 - 2015
Davy Vancampfort1,2, Brendon Stubbs3, Alex J. Mitchell4,5, Marc De Hert2, Martien Wampers2, Philip B. Ward6, Simon Rosenbaum6, Christoph U. Correll7,8
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2UPC KU Leuven, Campus Kortenberg, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium
3School of Health and Social Care, University of Greenwich, Eltham, London, UK
4Department of Cancer and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
5Department of Psycho-oncology, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
6School of Psychiatry; University of New South Wales; Sydney; NSW; Australia
7Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
8Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

Tóm tắt

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components are highly predictive of cardiovascular diseases. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to assess the prevalence of MetS and its components in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder, comparing subjects with different disorders and taking into account demographic variables and psychotropic medication use. The secondary aim was to compare the MetS prevalence in persons with any of the selected disorders versus matched general population controls. The pooled MetS prevalence in people with severe mental illness was 32.6% (95% CI: 30.8%‐34.4%; N = 198; n = 52,678). Relative risk meta‐analyses established that there was no significant difference in MetS prevalence in studies directly comparing schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder, and in those directly comparing bipolar disorder versus major depressive disorder. Only two studies directly compared people with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, precluding meta‐analytic calculations. Older age and a higher body mass index were significant moderators in the final demographic regression model (z = −3.6, p = 0.0003, r2 = 0.19). People treated with all individual antipsychotic medications had a significantly (p<0.001) higher MetS risk compared to antipsychotic‐naïve participants. MetS risk was significantly higher with clozapine and olanzapine (except vs. clozapine) than other antipsychotics, and significantly lower with aripiprazole than other antipsychotics (except vs. amisulpride). Compared with matched general population controls, people with severe mental illness had a significantly increased risk for MetS (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.35‐1.86; p<0.001) and all its components, except for hypertension (p = 0.07). These data suggest that the risk for MetS is similarly elevated in the diagnostic subgroups of severe mental illness. Routine screening and multidisciplinary management of medical and behavioral conditions is needed in these patients. Risks of individual antipsychotics should be considered when making treatment choices.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.242

10.1093/schbul/sbu138

10.1371/journal.pone.0019590

10.1136/bmj.f2539

10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1123

10.1111/acps.12045

10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00014.x

10.1177/1359786810382056

10.1192/bjp.bp.111.094532

10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045732

10.1192/bjp.bp.110.084665

10.1017/S003329171100105X

10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.032

10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.031

10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034

Expert Panel on Detection and Evaluation of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, 2001, Executive summary of the third report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), JAMA, 285, 2486, 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404

10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01858.x

World Health Organization, 1999, Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644

10.1093/schbul/sbr148

10.1093/schbul/sbs082

10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12050620

10.1017/S0033291713002778

10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13040447

10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13040447r

10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

10.2307/2533446

10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Duvall S, 2000, A non‐parametric ‘trim and fill’ method for assessing publication bias in meta‐analysis, J Am Stat Assoc, 95, 89

10.1001/jama.287.3.356

10.1001/archinte.163.4.427

10.1002/wps.20069

10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.246876

10.1186/1745-0179-2-14

10.1038/nrendo.2011.156

10.1345/aph.1L015

10.1038/npp.2010.78

10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1314

10.1192/bjp.bp.109.076935

10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.046

10.1176/appi.ps.201200143

10.1111/bdi.12160

10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.01.005

McIntyre RS, 2012, The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) task force recommendations for the management of patients with mood disorders and comorbid metabolic disorders, Ann Clin Psychiatry, 24, 69

10.3109/09638288.2011.587090

10.4088/JCP.13r08558

10.1176/appi.ps.201100092

10.4088/JCP.9058se1c.04gry

10.2174/138161212803523662

10.1007/s00213-013-2972-5

10.1002/wps.20204

10.1038/mp.2012.144

10.1159/000355632

10.1002/wps.20117

10.4088/JCP.14m09009

10.1002/wps.20187