Risk factors for upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with the use of central vein catheter in cancer patients

Internal and Emergency Medicine - Tập 3 - Trang 117-122 - 2008
Melina Verso1, Giancarlo Agnelli1, Pieter W. Kamphuisen1,2, Walter Ageno3, Mario Bazzan4, Antonio Lazzaro5, Francesco Paoletti6, Maurizio Paciaroni1, Stefano Mosca7, Sergio Bertoglio8
1Sezione di Medicina Interna e Cardiovascolare - Stroke Unit, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
2Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3Unità di Medicina I, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica, Universita’ dell’Insubria, Varese, Italy
4Servizio di Ematologia e malattie trombotiche, Ospedale Evangelico Valdese, Turin, Italy
5Unità Operativa di Oncoematologia, Ospedale di Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy
6Sezione di Anestesia, Analgesia e Terapia Intensiva, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
7Sezione Di Radiologia Diagnostica Ed Interventistica, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
8Unità Operativa di Chirurgia Gastroenterologica, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy

Tóm tắt

Deep vein thrombosis of upper limb is a common complication of CVC in patients with cancer. In these patients the risk factors for CVC-related thrombosis are not completely defined. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for CVC-related thrombosis in patients included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin for the prophylaxis of CVC-related thrombosis. CVC-related thrombosis was screened by mandatory venography after 6 weeks of study treatment. A number of patient baseline characteristics were assessed as potential risk factors for CVC-related deep vein thrombosis. Crude associations between risk factors and clinical outcomes were assessed by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors. A CVC-related thrombosis was found in 50 out of 310 patients (16.1%). At multiple logistic regression analysis, CVC tip misplaced in the upper half of superior vena cava (OR 4.05, 95%CI 1.64–10.02), left-sided CVC insertion (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.01–5.51) and chest radiotherapy (OR 7.01, 95%CI 1.42–34.66) were independent risk factors for thrombosis. In addition to these risk factors, the presence of distant metastases (OR 9.36, 95%CI 1.53–57.05) increased the risk of thrombosis in patients who received placebo. An inadequate position of the CVC tip, left-sided CVC insertion and chest radiotherapy are independent risk factors for CVC-related thrombosis in cancer patients. Patients with distant metastases have an increased risk for thrombosis in absence of antithrombotic prophylaxis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agnelli G, Verso M (2006) Therapy insight: venous catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 3(4):214–222 Agnelli G, Verso M (2005) Thrombosis and cancer: clinical relevance of a dangerous liaison. Haematologica 90(2):154–156 Verso M, Agnelli G (2003) Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 21:3665–3675 Bern HM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR et al (1990) Very low dose of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters: a randomized, prospective trial. Ann Inter Med 112:423–428 Monreal M, Alastrue A, Rull M et al (1996) Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients with venous access devices. Prophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin). Thromb Haemost 75:251–253 Karthaus M, Kretzschmar A, Kröning H et al (2006) A Dalteparin for prevention of catheter-related complications in cancer patients with central venous catheters: final results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Ann Oncol 17(2):289–296 Couban S, Goodyear M, Burnell M et al (2005) Randomized placebo-controlled study of low-dose warfarin for the prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(18):4063–4069 Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA et al (2004) Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 126:338S–400S Young AM, Begum G, Billingham LJ (2005) WARP-a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial of thrombosis prophylaxis with warfarin in cancer patients with central venous catheters (CVCs). Ann ASCO Meet 2005; abstr no. 8004 Verso M, Agnelli G, Bertoglio S et al (2005) Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism associated with central vein catheters: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23(18):4057–4062 Cadman A, Lawrance JAL, Fitzsimmons L, Spencer-Shaw A, Swindell R (2004) To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters? Clin Rad 59:349–355 Tesselaar ME, Ouwerkek J, Nooy MA, Rosendaal FR, Osanto S (2004) Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 40:2253–2259 Eastridge BJ, Lefor AT (1995) Complication of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients. J Clin Onc 13(1):233–238 Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM et al (1998) Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients. Incidence, risk factors and relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest 114:207–213 Craft PS, May J, Dorigo A, Hoy C, Plant A (1996) Hickman catheters: left sided insertion, male gender and obesity are associated with an increased risk of complications. Aust NZ J Med 26:33–39 Unal AE, Bayar S, Arat M, Ihhan O (2003) Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts. Transfus Apheresis Sci 28:9–12 PetersenJ, Delaney JH, Brakstad MT, Rowbotham RK, Bagley CM (1999) Silicone venous access devices positioned with their tips high in the superior vena cava are more likely to malfunction. Am J Surg 178(1):38–41 McGee WT, Ackerman BL, Rouben LR, Prasad VM, Bandi V, Mallory DL (1993) Accurate placement of central venous catheters: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 21(8):1118–1123 Puel V, Caudry M, Metayer P et al (1993) Superior vena cava thrombosis related to catheter malposition in cancer chemotherapy given through implanted ports. Cancer 72:2248–2252 Agnelli G, Verso M (2006) Is antithrombotic prophylaxis required in cancer patients with central venous catheters? No. J Thromb Haemost 4(1):14–15 Luciani A, Clement O, Halimi P et al (2001) Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on doppler US. Radiology 220(3):655–660 Kearns PJ, Coleman S, Wehner JH (1996) Complications of long-term catheters: randomized trial of central vs. peripheral tip location. J PEN 20(1):20–24 Gould JR, Carloss HW, Skinner WL (1993) Groshong catheter-associated subclavian venous thrombosis. Am J Med 95(4):419–423 De Cicco M, Matovic M, Balestrieri L et al (1997) Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long term silastic catheter. A prospective study. Thromb Res 86(2):101–113 Blom JW, Doggen CJM, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR (2005) Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 293:715–722 Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Andrew M (1998) Benefit of heparin in central venous and pulmonary artery catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest 113(1):165–171 Stephens LC, Haire WD, Tarantolo S et al (1997) Normal saline versus heparin flush for maintaining central venous catheter patency during apheresis collection of peripheral blood stem cell. Transfus Sci 18(2):187–193