Risk factors for the presence of residual disease in women after partial mastectomy for invasive breast cancer: A single institution experience

Surgical Oncology - Tập 37 - Trang 101608 - 2021
Lauren M. DeStefano1, Lauren Coffua2, Elise Wilson3, Julia Tchou4, Lawrence N. Shulman5, Michael Feldman6, Ari Brooks4, Dahlia Sataloff4, Carla S. Fisher7
1Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Department of Surgery, Crozer-Chester Medical Center, Upland, PA, USA
3Department of Gynecology-Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
4Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
5Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Surgical Pathology. Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
7Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis IN USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fisher, 1995, Reanalysis and results after 12 Years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 333, 1456, 10.1056/NEJM199511303332203 Fisher, 2002, Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 347, 1233, 10.1056/NEJMoa022152 Merrill, 2016, Implications of new lumpectomy margin guidelines for breast-conserving surgery: changes in Re-excision rates and predicted rates of residual tumor, Ann. Surg Oncol., 23, 729, 10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2 Moran, 2014, Society of surgical Oncology-American society for radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer, Ann. Surg Oncol., 21, 704, 10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4 Shah, 2017, Appropriate margins for breast conserving surgery in patients with early stage breast cancer: A meta-analysis [abstract] Chagpar, 2015, A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 373, 503, 10.1056/NEJMoa1504473 Vos, 2015, Overall survival in patients with a Re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort, Eur. J. Canc., 51, 282, 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.003 Vos, 2017, Omitting Re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival, Breast Canc. Res. Treat., 164, 157, 10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6 Yu, 2017, Cost analysis of a surgical consensus guideline in breast-conserving surgery, J. Am. Coll. Surg., 225, 294, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.020 Agostinho, 2015, Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery, Breast, 24, 46, 10.1016/j.breast.2014.11.001 Rath, 2015, Predictors of residual tumor in breast-conserving therapy, Ann. Surg Oncol., 22, S451, 10.1245/s10434-015-4736-4 Margenthaler, 2010, Margin index: a new method for prediction of residual disease after breast-conserving surgery, Ann. Surg Oncol., 17, 2696, 10.1245/s10434-010-1079-z Bolger, 2012, Analysis of margin index as a method for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery in a European cancer center, Ann. Surg Oncol., 19, 207, 10.1245/s10434-011-1810-4 Fisher, 2011, Margin index is not a reliable tool for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS, Ann. Surg Oncol., 18, 3155, 10.1245/s10434-011-1918-6 Edwards, 2011, Margin index: a useful tool for breast surgeons?, J. Surg. Res., 18, 3155