Risk assessment models to estimate cancer probabilities

Current Oncology Reports - Tập 9 - Trang 503-508 - 2008
Constance M. Johnson1, Derek Smolenski
1School of Nursing, Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA

Tóm tắt

Cancer risk has become a significant research topic due to an increase in statistical risk models built to predict cancer incidence or mortality. Over the past 3 years, 15 models on the development of different types of cancer, including breast, colorectal, prostate, gastric, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, testicular, and skin, have been published. Risk assessment models are dynamic; they need to be updated as often as risks are discovered or changed. Not only are cancer risk models challenging to build, but, due to literacy-related issues, the cancer risk itself is challenging to communicate to the public. Clearly, guidelines outlining how to create valid and reliable risk assessment models are needed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007, 57:43–66. Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, et al.: Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:1204–1214. Burgi A, Brodine S, Wegner S, et al.: Incidence and risk factors for the occurrence of non-AIDS-defining cancers among human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals. Cancer 2005, 104:1505–1511. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al.: Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:1215–1226. Chen K, Yu WP, Song L, Zhu YM: Quantitative assessment model for gastric cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:641–644. Cho E, Rosner BA, Feskanich D, Colditz GA: Risk factors and individual probabilities of melanoma for whites. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:2669–2675. French JL, Wand MP: Generalized additive models for cancer mapping with incomplete covariates. Biostatistics 2004, 5:177–191. Kim DJ, Rockhill B, Colditz GA: Validation of the Harvard Cancer Risk Index: a prediction tool for individual cancer risk. J Clin Epidemiol 2004, 57:332–340. Novotny J, Pecen L, Petruzelka L, et al.: Breast cancer risk assessment in the Czech female population—an adjustment of the original Gail model. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006, 95:29–35. Rosner BA, Colditz GA, Webb PM, Hankinson SE: Mathematical models of ovarian cancer incidence. Epidemiology 2005, 16:508–515. Simon MS, Korczak JF, Yee CL, et al.: Breast cancer risk estimates for relatives of white and African American women with breast cancer in the Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:2498–2504. Spitz MR, Hong WK, Amos CI, et al.: A risk model for prediction of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007, 99:715–726. Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al.: Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:529–534. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J: A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 2004, 23:1111–1130. Chuang RB, Hu WY, Chiu TY, Chen CY: Prediction of survival in terminal cancer patients in Taiwan: constructing a prognostic scale. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004, 28:115–122. Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G, et al.: Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 2005, 241:247–255. Meyer S, Gottschling S, Biran T, et al.: Assessing the risk of mortality in paediatric cancer patients admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit: a novel risk score? Eur J Pediatr 2005, 164:563–567. Regazzoni CJ, Irrazabal C, Luna CM, Poderoso JJ: Cancer patients with septic shock: mortality predictors and neutropenia. Support Care Cancer 2004, 12:833–839. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al.: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989, 81:1879–1886. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program: SEER 17 Incidence and Mortality, 2000–2003, with Kaposi Sarcoma and Mesothelioma. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, based on the November 2005 submission; 2006. Weinstein ND: What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999, 25:15–20. Emmons KM, Wong M, Puleo E, et al.: Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Commun 2004, 9:127–141. Yamagishi K: When 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: implications for risk communication. Appl Cogn Psychol 1997, 11:495–506. Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A: Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey, edn 3. Washington, DC: National Center for Education, US Department of Education; 2002. Gurmankin AD, Baron J, Armstrong K: The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Med Decis Making 2004, 24:265–271. Stone ER, Sieck WR, Bull BE, et al.: Foreground: background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2003, 90:19–36. Halpern DF, Blackman S, Salzman B: Using statistical risk to assess oral contraceptive safety. Appl Cogn Psychol 1989, 3:251–260. Haimes YY: Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998. US National Academy of Sciences: Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1983. Szymczak W, Szadkowska-Stanczyk I: Cancer risk assessment: present and future. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007, 18:207–223. Mirvish SS, Haorah J, Zhou L, et al.: Total N-nitroso compounds and their precursors in hot dogs and in the gastrointestinal tract and feces of rats and mice: possible etiologic agents for colon cancer. J Nutr 2002, 132(Suppl):3526S–3529S. Chao A, Thun MJ, Connell CJ, et al.: Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2005, 293:172–182. Hertz-Picciotto I: Epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment: a bridge from science to policy. Am J Public Health 1995, 85:484–491. van Wijngaarden E, Hertz-Picciotto I: A simple approach to performing quantitative cancer risk assessment using published results from occupational epidemiology studies. Sci Total Environ 2004, 332:81–87. Reilly BM, Evans AT: Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006, 144:201–209. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell JG: Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997, 277:488–494. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L: Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985, 313:793–799. Kannel WB, McGee D, Gordon T: A general cardiovascular risk profile: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol 1976, 38:46–51. Grundy SM, Balady GJ, Criqui MH, et al.: Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: guidance from Framingham: a statement for healthcare professionals from the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction. American Heart Association. Circulation 1998, 97:1876–1887. Women’s Health Initiative Writing Group: Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 288:321–325. Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H: Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health 1994, 84:43–49. Your Disease Risk: the Source on Prevention. The Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention. Available at http://www.yourdiseaserisk.harvard.edu/hccpquiz.pl?lang=english&func=home&page=cancer_index. Accessed August 24, 2007. UCLA Internet Report 2001: Surveying the Digital Future. UCLA Center for Communication Policy. Available at http://www.ccp.ucla.edu. Accessed August 24, 2007. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER: Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002, 287:2691–2700. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. National Cancer Institute. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool. Accessed August 24, 2007. MacMahon B, Cole P, Brown JB, et al.: Oestrogen profiles of Asian and North American women. Lancet 1971, 2:900–902. Colditz GA, Stein CJ: Handbook of Cancer Risk Assessment and Prevention. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004. Poynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PD, et al.: Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:2184–2192. Dale KM, Coleman CI, Henyan NH, et al.: Statins and cancer risk. JAMA 2006, 295:74–80. Freedman AN, Seminara D, Gail MH, et al.: Cancer risk prediction models: a workshop on development, evaluation, and application. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005, 97:715–723.