Risk Calculation as Experience and Action—Assessing and Managing the Risks and Opportunities of Nanomaterials

Barber B (1987) Trust in science. Minerva 25:123–134. doi:10.1007/BF01096860 Luhmann N (2000) The reality of the mass media. Stanford University Press, Stanford NRC (2009) Science and decisions. Advancing risk assessment. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C Jahnel J (2015) Addressing the challenges to the risk assessment of nanomaterials. In: Dolez PI (ed) Nanoengineering: Global approaches to health and safety issues. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston and Heidelberg, pp 485–521 Miller G, Wickson F (2015) Risk analysis of nanomaterials: exposing nanotechnology’s naked emperor. Rev Policy Res 32:485–512. doi:10.1111/ropr.12129 Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci Cult 10:445–481 Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244 SCHER, SCENIHR, SCCS (2013) Making risk assessment more relevant for risk management. scientific committee on consumer safety; scientific committee on health and environmental risks; scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks. European Commission, Brussels Stirling A (2008) “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Hum Values 33:262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 IRCG (2006) White paper on nanotechnology risk governance. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva Jahnel J (2015) Conceptual questions and challenges associated with the traditional risk assessment paradigm for nanomaterials. NanoEthics 9(3). doi:10.1007/s11569-015-0235-0 Luhmann N (2012) Theory of society - volume 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford Luhmann N (1994) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, 2nd edn. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main Fleischer T, Jahnel J, Seitz S (2012) NanoSafety. Risk governance of manufactured nanoparticles. STOA, Brussels Groves C (2009) Nanotechnology, contingency and finitude. NanoEthics 3:1–16. doi:10.1007/s11569-009-0057-z Rocks S, Pollard S, Dorey R et al (2008) Comparison of risk assessment approaches for manufactured nanomaterials. Defra, London Efsa SC (2011) Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J 9:1–36. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2140 SCENIHR (2007) Opinion on the appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the technical guidance docum ents for new and existing substances for assessing the risk of nanomaterials. European Commission, Brussels Robinson LA, Levy DI (2011) The [r]evolving relationship between risk assessment and risk management. Risk Anal 31:1334–1344 OECD (2003) Descriptions of selected key generic terms used in chemical hazard/risk assessment. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris Starr C (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk. What is our society willing to pay for safety? Science 165:1232–1238 Kahneman D, Tversky A (1982) Subjective probability - a judgement of representativeness. In: Kahneman D (ed) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 32–47 Jungermann H, Slovic P (1993) Die Psychologie der Kognition und Evaluation von Risiko. In: Bechmann G (ed) Risiko und Gesellschaft. Grundlagen und Ergebnisse interdisziplinärer Risikoforschung. Westdt Verl, Opladen, pp 167–207 Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 62:451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 Rowe WD (1977) An anatomy of risk. Wiley, New York Renn O (2008) Concepts of risk: an interdisciplinary review - part 2: integrative approaches. GAIA 17:196–204 Jasanoff S (1998) The political science of risk perception. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:91–99. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00129-4 Zwick MM, Renn O (2008) Risikokonzepte jenseits von Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit und Schadenserwartung. In: Felgentreff C, Glade T (eds) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen. Spektrum, Berlin, pp 77–97 Merz B, Emmermann R (2006) Zum Umgang mit Naturgefahren in Deutschland: Vom Reagieren zum Risikomanagement. GAIA 15:265–274 Felgentreff C, Glade T (2008) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen. Spektrum, Berlin et al. Wynne B (1995) Technology assessment and reflexive learning: Observations from the risk field. In: Rip A, Misa TJ, Schot J (eds) Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 19–36 Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? - A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. SAGE, London, Thousands Oaks and New Delhi, pp 44–83 Wynne B (2005) Risk as globalizing “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 66–82 Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford Pielke RA (2007) The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Japp KP (1992) Selbstverstärkungseffekte riskanter Entscheidungen. Zur Unterscheidung von Rationalität und Risiko. ZfS 21:31–48 Luhmann N (2005) Risk - a sociological theory. Aldine Transactions, New Brunswick (USA) Büscher C, Mascareño A (2014) Mechanisms of risk production in modern cities. Nat Cult 9:66–86. doi:10.3167/nc.2014.090104 Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, http://www.econlib.org/library/Knight/knRUP.html March JG (1994) A primer on decision making: how decisions happen. Maxwell Macmillan International, New York Luhmann N (1993) Die Paradoxie der Form. In: Baecker D (ed) Kalkül der Form. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp 197–212 Hansen SF, Baun A (2015) DPSIR- and stakeholder analysis of the use of nanosilver. NanoEthics 9(2) MacCrimmon KR, Wehrung DA, Stanbury WT (1986) Taking risks: the management of uncertainty. Free Press, New York Elster J (1994) Rationality, emotions, and social norms. Synthese 98:21–49. doi:10.1007/BF01064024 Brunsson N (2000) The irrational organization: irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change, 2nd edn. Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad Bjørke, Bergen Brunsson N (2007) The consequences of decision-making. Oxford University Press, Oxford March JG, Simon H (1993) Organizations, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge Spencer-Brown G (1997) Laws of Form. Gesetze der Form. Bohmeier, Lübeck Merton RK (1973) The normative structure of science. In: Storer NW (ed) The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 267–278 Luhmann N (2006) System as difference. Organization 13:37–57. doi:10.1177/1350508406059638 Malle BF (1999) How people explain behavior: a New theoretical framework. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 3:23–48. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2 Parsons T, Platt GM (1973) The American university. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Pinch T (1985) Towards an analysis of scientific observation: the externality and evidential significance of observational reports in physics. Soc Stud Sci 15:3–36. doi:10.1177/030631285015001001 Douglas H (2004) The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese 138:453–473. doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91 IceCube Collaboration (2013) Evidence for high-energy extraterrestrial neutrinos at the IceCube detector. Science 342:1–7. doi:10.1126/science.1242856 Spencer-Brown G (1996) Wahrscheinlichkeit und Wissenschaft. Carl-Auer-Systeme, Heidelberg Weiss C (2003) Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law Probab Risk 2:25–46. doi:10.1093/lpr/2.1.25 von Weizsäcker CF (1985) Aufbau der Physik. Carl Hanser Verlag, München Lindley DV (2000) The philosophy of statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser Stat 49:293 Kusche I (2008) Politikberatung und die Herstellung von Entscheidungssicherheit im politischen System. VS Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N et al (2012) Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:3–14. doi:10.1002/etc.733 JRC (2011) REACH implementation project: substance identification of nano materials (RIP - oN 1) - Advisory report. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Renn O, Grobe A (2010) Risk governance in the field of nanotechnologies: Core challanges of an integrative approach. In: Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) International handbook on regulating nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK/ University of Michigan, USA, pp 484–507 Luhmann N (1996) On the scientific context of the concept of communication. Soc Sci Inf 35:257–267. doi:10.1177/053901896035002005 Meili C, Widmer M (2010) Voluntary measures in nanotechnology risk governance: The difficulty of holding the wolf by the ears. In: Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) International handbook on regulating nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK/ University of Michigan, USA, pp 446–461 Krug HF (2014) Nanosafety research—Are we on the right track? Angew Chem Int Ed. doi:10.1002/anie.201403367 de Sadeleer N (2006) The precautionary principle in EC health and environmental Law. Eur Law J 12:139–172. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00313.x Widmer M, Meili C (2010) Approaching the nanoregulation problem in chemical legislation in the EU and US. In: Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) International handbook on regulating nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK/ University of Michigan, USA, pp 239–267 Japp KP (2000) Distinguishing non-knowledge. Can J Sociol 25:225–238 Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (2010) Introduction: The regulatory challenges for nanotechnologies. In: Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) International handbook on regulating nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK/ University of Michigan, USA, pp 3–24 Hansen SF (2013) The European Union’s chemical legislation needs revision. Nat Nanotechnol 8:305–306. doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.72 Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16:409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133 Luhmann N (2010) Politische Soziologie. Suhrkamp, Berlin Millstone E (2010) The evolution of risk assessment paradigms: in theory and in practice. Sussex, England Codex Alimentarius Commission (2007) Codex alimentarius. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Luhmann N (2000) Organisation und Entscheidung. Westdt Verl, Opladen