Rim lesions are demonstrated in early relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis using 3 T-based susceptibility-weighted imaging in a multi-institutional setting

Neuroradiology - Tập 64 Số 1 - Trang 109-117 - 2022
Koy Chong Ng Kee Kwong1, Daisy Mollison1, Rozanna Meijboom1, Elizabeth York1, Agniete Kampaite1, Sarah‐Jane Martin2, David Hunt1, Michael J. Thrippleton1, Siddharthan Chandran1, Adam Waldman1
1Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh bioQuarter, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
2Department of Neurosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Tóm tắt

Abstract Purpose Rim lesions, characterised by a paramagnetic rim on susceptibility-based MRI, have been suggested to reflect chronic inflammatory demyelination in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Here, we assess, through susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), the prevalence, longitudinal volume evolution and clinical associations of rim lesions in subjects with early relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). Methods Subjects (n = 44) with recently diagnosed RRMS underwent 3 T MRI at baseline (M0) and 1 year (M12) as part of a multi-centre study. SWI was acquired at M12 using a 3D segmented gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence. Rim lesions identified on SWI were manually segmented on FLAIR images at both time points for volumetric analysis. Results Twelve subjects (27%) had at least one rim lesion at M12. A linear mixed-effects model, with ‘subject’ as a random factor, revealed mixed evidence for the difference in longitudinal volume change between rim lesions and non-rim lesions (p = 0.0350 and p = 0.0556 for subjects with and without rim lesions, respectively). All 25 rim lesions identified showed T1-weighted hypointense signal. Subjects with and without rim lesions did not differ significantly with respect to age, disease duration or clinical measures of disability (p > 0.05). Conclusion We demonstrate that rim lesions are detectable in early-stage RRMS on 3 T MRI across multiple centres, although their relationship to lesion enlargement is equivocal in this small cohort. Identification of SWI rims was subjective. Agreed criteria for defining rim lesions and their further validation as a biomarker of chronic inflammation are required for translation of SWI into routine MS clinical practice.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 391(10130):1622–1636

Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA (2018) Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 378(2):169–180

Kuhlmann T, Ludwin S, Prat A, Antel J, Bruck W, Lassmann H (2017) An updated histological classification system for multiple sclerosis lesions. Acta Neuropathol 133(1):13–24

Metz I, Weigand SD, Popescu BF, Frischer JM, Parisi JE, Guo Y et al (2014) Pathologic heterogeneity persists in early active multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 75(5):728–738

Lucchinetti C, Bruck W, Parisi J, Scheithauer B, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H (2000) Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol 47(6):707–717

Absinta M, Sati P, Reich DS (2016) Advanced MRI and staging of multiple sclerosis lesions. Nat Rev Neurol 12(6):358–368

Filippi M, Bruck W, Chard D, Fazekas F, Geurts JJG, Enzinger C et al (2019) Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 18(2):198–210

Matthews PM (2019) Chronic inflammation in multiple sclerosis - seeing what was always there. Nat Rev Neurol 15(10):582–593

Bagnato F, Hametner S, Yao B, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Cantor FK et al (2011) Tracking iron in multiple sclerosis: a combined imaging and histopathological study at 7 Tesla. Brain 134:3599–3612

Dal-Bianco A, Grabner G, Kronnerwetter C, Weber M, Hoftberger R, Berger T et al (2017) Slow expansion of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions: pathology and 7 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neuropathol 133(1):25–42

Absinta M, Sati P, Masuzzo F, Nair G, Sethi V, Kolb H et al (2019) Association of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions with disability in vivo. Jama Neurol 76(12):1474–1483

Gillen KM, Mubarak M, Nguyen TD, Pitt D (2018) Significance and in vivo detection of iron-laden microglia in white matter multiple sclerosis lesions. Front Immunol 9:255

Absinta M, Sati P, Schindler M, Leibovitch EC, Ohayon J, Wu T et al (2016) Persistent 7-tesla phase rim predicts poor outcome in new multiple sclerosis patient lesions. J Clin Invest 126(7):2597–2609

Yao B, Ikonomidou VN, Cantor FK, Ohayon JM, Duyn J, Bagnato F (2015) Heterogeneity of Multiple Sclerosis White Matter Lesions Detected With T2*-Weighted Imaging at 7.0 Tesla. J Neuroimaging 25(5):799–806

Chawla S, Kister I, Wuerfel J, Brisset JC, Liu S, Sinnecker T et al (2016) Iron and non-iron-related characteristics of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica lesions at 7T MRI. Am J Neuroradiol 37(7):1223–1230

Kilsdonk ID, Wattjes MP, Lopez-Soriano A, Kuijer JPA, de Jong MC, de Graaf WL et al (2014) Improved differentiation between MS and vascular brain lesions using FLAIR* at 7 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24(4):841–849

Sinnecker T, Dorr J, Pfueller CF, Harms L, Ruprecht K, Jarius S et al (2012) Distinct lesion morphology at 7-T MRI differentiates neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Neurology 79(7):708–714

Sinnecker T, Schumacher S, Mueller K, Pache F, Dusek P, Harms L et al (2016) MRI phase changes in multiple sclerosis vs neuromyelitis optica lesions at 7T. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 3(4):e259

Wuerfel J, Sinnecker T, Ringelstein EB, Jarius S, Schwindt W, Niendorf T et al (2012) Lesion morphology at 7 Tesla MRI differentiates Susac syndrome from multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 18(11):1592–1599

Maggi P, Sati P, Nair G, Cortese ICM, Jacobson S, Smith BR et al (2020) Paramagnetic rim lesions are specific to multiple sclerosis: an international multicenter 3t mri study. Ann Neurol 88(5):1034–1042

Suthiphosuwan S, Sati P, Absinta M, Guenette M, Reich DS, Bharatha A et al (2020) Paramagnetic rim sign in radiologically isolated syndrome. JAMA Neurol 77(5):653–655

Clarke MA, Pareto D, Pessini-Ferreira L, Arrambide G, Alberich M, Crescenzo F et al (2020) Value of 3T susceptibility-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41(6):1001–1008

Blindenbacher N, Brunner E, Asseyer S, Scheel M, Siebert N, Rasche L et al (2020) Evaluation of the “ring sign” and the “core sign” as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of disease activity and progression in clinically isolated syndrome and early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 6(1):2055217320915480

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302

Sati P, Patil S, Inati S, Wang WT, Derbyshire JA, Krueger G et al (2017) Rapid MR susceptibility imaging of the brain using segmented 3d echo-planar imaging (3d EPI) and its clinical applications. Magnetom FLASH 68:26–32

Li X, Morgan PS, Ashburner J, Smith J, Rorden C (2016) The first step for neuroimaging data analysis: DICOM to NIfTI conversion. J Neurosci Methods 264:47–56

Jenkinson M, Smith S (2001) A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 5(2):143–156

Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17(2):825–841

Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3):1116–1128

Absinta M, Sati P, Fechner A, Schindler MK, Nair G, Reich DS (2018) Identification of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions on 3T MRI. Am J Neuroradiol 39(7):1233–1238

Eisele P, Fischer K, Szabo K, Platten M, Gass A (2019) Characterization of contrast-enhancing and non-contrastenhancing multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility-weighted imaging. Front Neurol 10:1082

Bagnato F, Jeffries N, Richert ND, Stone RD, Ohayon JM, McFarland HF et al (2003) Evolution of T1 black holes in patients with multiple sclerosis imaged monthly for 4 years. Brain 126(Pt 8):1782–1789

Thaler C, Faizy TD, Sedlacik J, Holst B, Sturner K, Heesen C et al (2017) T1 Recovery is predominantly found in black holes and is associated with clinical improvement in patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(2):264–269

Rovaris M, Comi G, Rocca MA, Cercignani M, Colombo B, Santuccio G et al (1999) Relevance of hypointense lesions on fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images as a marker of disease severity in cases of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20(5):813–820