Rho GTPases and the control of cell behaviour

Biochemical Society Transactions - Tập 33 Số 5 - Trang 891-895 - 2005
Alison K. Hall1
1MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cancer Research UK Oncogene and Signal Transduction Group, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.

Tóm tắt

Rho, Rac and Cdc42, three members of the Rho family of small GTPases, each control a signal transduction pathway linking membrane receptors to the assembly and disassembly of the actin cytoskeleton and of associated integrin adhesion complexes. Rho regulates stress fibre and focal adhesion assembly, Rac regulates the formation of lamellipodia protrusions and membrane ruffles, and Cdc42 triggers filopodial extensions at the cell periphery. These observations have led to the suggestion that wherever filamentous actin is used to drive a cellular process, Rho GTPases are likely to play an important regulatory role. Rho GTPases have also been reported to control other cellular activities, such as the JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) and p38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cascades, an NADPH oxidase enzyme complex, the transcription factors NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) and SRF (serum-response factor), and progression through G1 of the cell cycle. Thus Rho, Rac and Cdc42 can regulate the actin cytoskeleton and gene transcription to promote co-ordinated changes in cell behaviour. We have been analysing the biochemical contributions of Rho GTPases in cell movement and have found that Rac controls cell protrusion, while Cdc42 controls cell polarity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Hall, 1998, Science, 279, 509, 10.1126/science.279.5350.509

Cerione, 1996, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 8, 216, 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80068-8

Schmidt, 2002, Genes Dev., 16, 1587, 10.1101/gad.1003302

Cote, 2002, J. Cell Sci., 115, 4901, 10.1242/jcs.00219

Bernards, 2003, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1603, 47

Ridley, 1992, Cell, 70, 389, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90163-7

Ridley, 1992, Cell, 70, 401, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90164-8

Nobes, 1995, Cell, 81, 53, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90370-4

Kozma, 1995, Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 1942, 10.1128/MCB.15.4.1942

Abo, 1991, Nature (London), 353, 668, 10.1038/353668a0

Etienne-Manneville, 2002, Nature (London), 420, 629, 10.1038/nature01148

Hill, 1995, Cell, 81, 1159, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80020-0

Minden, 1995, Cell, 81, 1147, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80019-4

Coso, 1995, Cell, 81, 1137, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80018-2

Miralles, 2003, Cell, 113, 329, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00278-2

Etienne-Manneville, 2004, J. Cell Sci., 117, 1291, 10.1242/jcs.01115

Bishop, 2000, Biochem. J., 348, 241, 10.1042/bj3480241

Machesky, 1998, Curr. Biol., 8, 1347, 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)00015-3

Millard, 2004, Biochem. J., 380, 1, 10.1042/bj20040176

Takenawa, 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 1801, 10.1242/jcs.114.10.1801

Eden, 2002, Nature (London), 418, 790, 10.1038/nature00859

Ho, 2004, Cell, 118, 203, 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.027

Vignjevic, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 160, 951, 10.1083/jcb.200208059

Riento, 2003, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 446, 10.1038/nrm1128

Nobes, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 144, 1235, 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1235

Sells, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 145, 837, 10.1083/jcb.145.4.837

Cau, 2005, J. Cell Sci., 118, 2579, 10.1242/jcs.02385

Joberty, 2000, Nat. Cell Biol., 2, 531, 10.1038/35019573

Lin, 2000, Nat. Cell Biol., 2, 540, 10.1038/35019582

Qiu, 2000, Curr. Biol., 10, 697, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00535-2

Etienne-Manneville, 2001, Cell, 106, 489, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00471-8

Etienne-Manneville, 2003, Nature (London), 421, 753, 10.1038/nature01423