Rheology and gel point of the enzymatic hydrolysis of urea in the presence of urease

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 29 - Trang 1-7 - 2017
R. Serrato-Millán1, L. Medina-Torres2, F. Calderas3, B. L. España-Sánchez1, M. Estevez4, A. R. Hernandez-Martínez4, M. Cruz-Soto5, I. C. Sánchez6, R. Gómez-García7, I. Sánchez-Betancourt8, M. C. Velasquillo-Martínez8, G. Luna-Bárcenas1
1Polymer & Biopolymer Research Group, CINVESTAV Querétaro, Libramiento Norponiente #2000, Fracc. Real de Juriquilla, Querétaro, México
2Chemistry Faculty, UNAM, México, México
3CIATEC, A. C. Omega 201, Col. Industrial Delta, Guanajuato, México
4CFATA-UNAM Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, México
5Health Sciences School, Universidad del Valle de México Campus, Querétaro, México
6Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
7Biotechnology, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, México, México
8Swine Production Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnology of UNAM, Mexico, México

Tóm tắt

This study reports on the rheology of the gelation kinetics of raw chitosan (CTS) solutions (2% w/v) produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of urea at different urea concentrations (40, 50, 60, 80, and 100 mM) in the presence of urease at 1 U/mL. Viscoelastic parameters and pH values were evaluated during gelation process and the rheological properties of CTS hydrogels produced were monitored after 24 h at 37°C to simulate human body temperatures. pH measurements suggest that above some critical urea concentration (50 mM) the time required (t gel ) to reach the critical pH gelation shows no dependence on urea concentration (t gel was ca. 70 minutes). Above 50 mM of urea concentration, CTS hydrogels exhibit an elastic modulus G′ higher than the viscous modulus G″ with no frequency dependence characteristic of a gel behavior. Gelation kinetics analyzed by rheology suggest that the G′ (i.e., structure) development depends on urea concentration during solution neutralization.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Assaad, E., M. Maire, and S. Lerouge, 2015, Injectable Thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels with controlled gelation kinetics and enhanced mechanical resistance, Carbohydr. Polym. 130, 87–96. Baysal, K., A.Z. Aroguz, Z. Adiguzel, and B.M. Baysal, 2013, Chitosan/alginate crosslinked hydrogels: Preparation, characterization and application for cell growth purposes, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 59, 342–348. Berger, J., M. Reist, J.M. Mayer, O. Felt, N.A. Peppas, and R. Gurny, 2004, Structure and interactions in covalently and ionically crosslinked chitosan hydrogels for biomedical applications, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 57, 19–34. Cairns, P., M.J. Miles, V.J. Morris, M.J. Ridout, G.J. Brownsey, and W.T. Winter, 1992, X-ray fibre diffraction studies of chitosan and chitosan gels, Carbohydr. Res. 235, 23–28. Chambon, F., 1987, Linear viscoelasticity at the gel point of a crosslinking PDMS with imbalanced stoichiometry, J. Rheol. 31, 683. Chang, Y., L. Xiao, and Q. Tang, 2009, Preparation and characterization of a novel thermosensitive hydrogel based on chitosan and gelatin blends, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 113, 400–407. Chenite, A., S. Gori, M. Shive, E. Desrosiers, and M.D. Buschmann, 2006, Monolithic gelation of chitosan solutions via enzymatic hydrolysis of urea, Carbohydr. Polym. 64, 419–424. Fernandez-Saiz, P., M.J. Ocio, and J.M. Lagaron, 2006, Film forming process and biocide assessment of high-molecularweight chitosan as determined by combined ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and antimicrobial assays, Biopolymers 83, 577–583. Giri, T.K., A. Thakur, A. Alexander, H. Badwaik, and D.K. Tripathi, 2012, Modified chitosan hydrogels as drug delivery and tissue engineering systems: Present status and applications, Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2, 439–449. Hu, G., J.A. Pojman, S.K. Scott, M.M. Wrobel, and A.F. Taylor, 2010, Base-catalyzed feedback in the urea-urease reaction, J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 14059–14063. Jiang, T., R. James, G. Sangamesh, C. Kumbar, and C.T. Laurencin, 2014, Chitosan as a biomaterial: Structure, properties, and applications in tissue engineering and drug delivery, In: Kumbar, C., C.T. Laurencin, and M. Deng, eds., Natural and Synthetic Biomedical Polymers, Elsevier, 91–107. Kumirska, J., M. Czerwicka, Z. Kaczynski, A. Bychowska, K. Brzozowski, J. Thöming, and P. Stepnowski, 2010, Application of spectroscopic methods for structural analysis of chitin and chitosan, Mar. Drugs 8, 1567–1636. Li, X.Y., X.Y. Kong, X.H. Wang, S. Shi, G. Guo, F. Luo, X. Zhao, Y.Q. Wei, and Z.Y. Qian, 2010, Gel-sol-gel thermo-gelation behavior study of chitosan-inorganic phosphate solutions, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 75, 388–392. Merkovich, E.A., M.-L. Carruette, V.G. Babak, G.A. Vikhoreva, L.S. Gal’braikh, and V.E. Kim, 2001, Kinetics of the initial stage of gelation in chitosan solutions containing glutaric aldehyde: Viscometric study, Colloid J. 63, 350–354. Montembault, A., C. Viton, and A. Domard, 2005, Rheometric study of the gelation of chitosan in aqueous solution without cross-linking agent, Biomacromolecules 6, 653–662. Ogawa, K., 1991, Effect of heating an aqueous suspension of chitosan on the crystallinity and polymorphs, Agric. Biol. Chem. 55, 2375–2379. Osorio-Madrazo, A., L. David, S. Trombotto, J.-M. Lucas, C. Peniche-Covas, and A. Domard, 2010, Kinetics study of the solid-state acid hydrolysis of chitosan: Evolution of the crystallinity and macromolecular structure, Biomacromolecules 11, 1376–1386. Sakai, S., M. Khanmohammadi, A.B. Khoshfetrat, and M. Taya, 2014, Horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed formation of hydrogels from chitosan and poly(vinyl alcohol) derivatives both possessing phenolic hydroxyl groups, Carbohydr. Polym. 111, 404–409. Sarmento, B. and J. das Neves, 2012, Chitosan-Based Systems for Biopharmaceuticals: Delivery, Targeting, and Polymer Therapeutics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. Winter, H.H., 1986, Analysis of linear viscoelasticity of a crosslinking polymer at the gel point, J. Rheol. 30, 367–382. Wrobel, M.M., T. Bansagi, S.K. Scott, A.F. Taylor, C.O. Bounds, A. Carranza, and J.A. Pojman, 2012, pH wave-front propagation in the urea-urease reaction, Biophys. J. 103, 610–615.