Revolutionizing solutions of technological assistance for the integration of lab and office activities in biomedical research

Niosi, 1999, Fourth-generation R&D: from linear models to flexible innovation, J. Bus. Res., 45, 111, 10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00230-0 Park, 2005, Linkage between knowledge management and R&D management, J. Knowledge Manag., 9, 34, 10.1108/13673270510610314 University Lab Partners, Wet lab vs. dry lab for your life science startup. https://www.universitylabpartners.org/blog/wet-lab-vs-dry-lab-for-your-life-science-startup (Accessed: October 28, 2021). Tabard, 2011, The eLabBench: an interactive tabletop system for the biology laboratory, 202 Echtler, 2010, 3439 Arnstein, 2002, Labscape: a smart environment for the cell biology laboratory, IEEE Pervasive Comput., 1, 13, 10.1109/MPRV.2002.1037717 Kock, 2000, Information overload and worker performance: a process-centered view, Knowledge and process management, 7, 256, 10.1002/1099-1441(200010/12)7:4<256::AID-KPM79>3.0.CO;2-U Piccoli, 2018 Roetzel, 2019, Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development, Bus. Res., 12, 479, 10.1007/s40685-018-0069-z Pijpers, 2010 Stokstad, 2001, Information overload hampers biology reforms, Science, 293, 1609, 10.1126/science.293.5535.1609 Tabard, 2008, From individual to collaborative: the evolution of prism, a hybrid laboratory notebook, 569 Wilson, 2001, Information overload: implications for healthcare services, Health Inf. J., 7, 112, 10.1177/146045820100700210 Hirsch, 2012, Information overload im betrieblichen Berichtswesen - ein unterschätztes Phänomen/Information overload in the management reporting context - an underestimated phenomenon, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 72 2011, Business: too much information, The Econ., 400, 59 Sander, 2016, Globalization as a risk factor for creativity and innovativeness, Ekonomski Vjesnik, 29, 177 Stocker, 2010, Wissensmanagement mit Web 2.0: grundlage und Herausforderung, OJoKM, Ausgabe II/2010, 7 Alavi, 1999, Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 1 Alavi, 2001, Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Q., 25, 107, 10.2307/3250961 Breznik, 2018, Knowledge management – from its inception to the innovation linkage, Procedia - Social and Behav. Sci., 238, 141, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.03.017 Pombriant, 2013, CRM and knowledge: CRM CRM, Customer Relationship Manag., 10, 13 Bose, 2002, Knowledge management capabilities & infrastructure for e-commerce, J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 42, 40 Paré, 2015, Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews, Inf. Manag., 52, 183, 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 Hawker, 2017, Automation in the clinical laboratory Berry, 2006, Turnaround time improvement and department-wide benefits of automation in urinalysis, Clin. Leadersh Manag. Rev., 20, E3 Genzen, 2018, Challenges and opportunities in implementing total laboratory automation, Clin. Chem., 64, 259, 10.1373/clinchem.2017.274068 Cadena-Herrera, 2015, Validation of three viable-cell counting methods: manual, semi-automated, and automated, Biotechnol. Rep. (Amst), 7, 9, 10.1016/j.btre.2015.04.004 Strober, 2015, Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability, Curr. Protoc. Immunol., 111, 10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs111 Louis, 2011, Cell viability analysis using trypan blue: manual and automated methods, 7 Gan, 2016, The world of biomedical apps: their uses, limitations, and potential, Sci. Phone Appl. Mob. Devices, 2, 6, 10.1186/s41070-016-0009-2 Perkel, 2017, The internet of things comes to the lab, Nature, 542, 125, 10.1038/542125a Austerjost, 2017, A smart device application for the automated determination of E. coli colonies on agar plates, Eng. Life Sci., 17, 959, 10.1002/elsc.201700056 Brugger, 2012, Automated counting of bacterial colony forming units on agar plates, PLoS ONE, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033695 Kong, 2012, Automatic liquid handling for life science: a critical review of the current state of the art, J. Lab Autom., 17, 169, 10.1177/2211068211435302 Gaisford, 2012, Robotic liquid handling and automation in epigenetics, J. Lab Autom., 17, 327, 10.1177/2211068212457160 Chapman, 2003, Lab automation and robotics: automation on the move, Nature, 421, 661 Griffith, 2012, Implementation and development of an automated, ultra-high-capacity, acoustic, flexible dispensing platform for assay-ready plate delivery, J. Lab Autom., 17, 348, 10.1177/2211068212457159 Hamilton, Automation. https://www.hamiltoncompany.com/automation (Accessed: February 14, 2020). Tecan Trading AG, Fluent automation workstation. https://lifesciences.tecan.com/fluent-laboratory-automation-workstation (Accessed: March 4, 2020). Assmus, 2006, Dynamics of biological systems: role of systems biology in medical research, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 6, 891, 10.1586/14737159.6.6.891 Chao, 2017, Engineering biological systems using automated biofoundries, Metab. Eng., 42, 98, 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.06.003 Whitehead, 2018, Automated planning enables complex protocols on liquid-handling robots, ACS Synth. Biol., 7, 922, 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00021 Kanza, 2017, Electronic lab notebooks: can they replace paper?, J. Cheminform, 9, 31, 10.1186/s13321-017-0221-3 Bird, 2013, Laboratory notebooks in the digital era: the role of ELNs in record keeping for chemistry and other sciences, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 8157, 10.1039/c3cs60122f Schraefel, 2004, Breaking the book: translating the chemistry lab book into a pervasive computing lab environment, 25 Arnstein, 2002, Systems support for ubiquitous computing: a case study of two implementations of labscape, 30 Mackay, 2002, The missing link: augmenting biology laboratory notebooks, 41 Costa-Cunha, 2003, Augmented paper and Anoto stylus, 232 Anoto Group AB. https://www.anoto.com/(Accessed: february 26, 2020). Yeh, 2006, ButterflyNet: a mobile capture and access system for field biology research, 571 Gerlach, 2019, Electronic lab notebooks and experimental design assistants, 257 Nehme, 2006, Electronic Laboratory Notebooks, 209 Du, 2007, Electronic laboratory notebooks in pharmaceutical R&D: on the road to maturity, J. Assoc. Lab Autom., 12, 157, 10.1016/j.jala.2007.01.001 Machina, 2013, Electronic laboratory notebooks progress and challenges in implementation, J. Lab. Autom., 18, 264, 10.1177/2211068213484471 Butler, 2005, A new leaf, Nature, 436, 20, 10.1038/436020a Guerrero, 2016, Analysis and implementation of an electronic laboratory notebook in a biomedical research Institute, PLoS ONE, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0160428 Riley, 2017, Implementation and use of cloud-based electronic lab notebook in a bioprocess engineering teaching laboratory, J. Biol. Eng., 11, 40, 10.1186/s13036-017-0083-2 Guerrero, 2019, A quick guide for using Microsoft OneNote as an electronic laboratory notebook, PLoS Comput. Biol., 15, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006918 Rubacha, 2011, A review of electronic laboratory notebooks available in the market today, J. Lab Autom., 16, 90, 10.1016/j.jala.2009.01.002 Dirnagl, 2016, A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences, F1000Res, 5, 2, 10.12688/f1000research.7628.1 Myers, 1996, Electronic laboratory notebooks for collaborative research, Proceedings of WET ICE '96. IEEE 5th Workshop on Enabling Technologies; Infrastucture for Collaborative Enterprises, 47, 10.1109/ENABL.1996.555050 Tabard, 2012, The eLabBench in the wild: supporting exploration in a molecular biology lab, 3051 Weiser, 1991, The computer for the 21 st century, Sci. Am., 265, 94, 10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 Pew Research Center, Mobile fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/(Accessed: March 26, 2020). Lee, 2015, The internet of things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises, Bus. Horiz., 58, 431, 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 Consolvo, 2002, User study techniques in the design and evaluation of a Ubicomp environment, 73 Shaer, 2010, G-nome surfer: a tabletop interface for collaborative exploration of genomic data, 1427 Shaer, 2011, Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction, 2817 Sokan, 2010, Alerting accidents with ambiguity: a tangible tabletop application for safe and independent chemistry experiments, 151 Song, 2011, 2305 Echtler, 2008, Shadow tracking on multi-touch tables, 388 Echtler, 2008, A multitouch software architecture, 463 Mayrhofer, 2019, One-Fits-all vs. tailor-made: user-centered workstations for field assembly with an application in aircraft parts manufacturing, Procedia Manuf., 39, 149, 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.287 Hincapié-Ramos, 2011, Mediated tabletop interaction in the biology lab: exploring the design space of the rabbit, UbiComp’11 - Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Comp., 301, 10.1145/2030112.2030153 Hile, 2004, Microbiology tray and pipette tracking as a proactive tangible user interface, 323, 10.1007/978-3-540-24646-6_23 Carmigniani, 2011, Augmented Reality: an Overview, 3 Kipper, 2013, Chapter 1 - what is augmented reality?, 1 Mitrasinovic, 2015, Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses, Technol. Health Care, 23, 381, 10.3233/THC-150910 Google, Glass. https://www.google.com/glass/start/(Accessed: march 17, 2020). Wei, 2018, Using google glass in surgical settings: systematic review, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 6, 10.2196/mhealth.9409 Hu, 2015, Exploring the use of google glass in wet laboratories, CHI EA '15, 2103 Scholl, 2015, 589 Scholl, 2015, RFID-based compound identification in wet laboratories with google glass, 1 Pagel, 2017, Q&A: what is human language, when did it evolve and why should we care?, BMC Biol., 15, 64, 10.1186/s12915-017-0405-3 Austerjost, 2018, Introducing a virtual assistant to the lab: a voice user interface for the intuitive control of laboratory instruments, SLAS Technol., 23, 476, 10.1177/2472630318788040 Pradhan, 2018, Accessibility came by accident”: use of voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants by people with disabilities Iñiguez-Carrillo, 2019, Towards a human-computer interaction model for voice user interfaces, 1 Cambre, 2019, Vitro: designing a voice assistant for the scientific lab workplace, 1531 Pyae, 2018, Investigating the usability and user experiences of voice user interface: a case of Google home smart speaker, 127 HelixAI, Helix. http://www.helix.ai/(Accessed: March 19, 2020). Tzinis, 2021, National aeronautics and space administration, Techno. Readiness Level Kim, 2016, Augmented reality “smart glasses” in the workplace: industry perspectives and challenges for worker safety and health, IIE Trans. Occup., 4, 253 Hofmann, 2017, Smart-glasses: exposing and elucidating the ethical issues, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 23, 701, 10.1007/s11948-016-9792-z Lau, 2018, Alexa, are you listening? Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers, Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. Article, 102 Cowan, 2017, What can i help you with?”: infrequent users’ experiences of intelligent personal assistants Herzog, 2018, Visual and optometric issues with smart glasses in Industry 4.0 working environment, Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag., 13, 417 Sahin, 2018, Safety and lack of negative effects of wearable augmented-reality social communication aid for children and adults with autism, J. Clin. Med., 7, 188, 10.3390/jcm7080188 Tabard, 2013, A case study of object and occlusion management on the eLabBench, a mixed physical/digital tabletop, 251 Lippi, 2019, Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: a personal overview, Clin. Chem. Lab. Med., 57, 802, 10.1515/cclm-2018-1323 Bainbridge, 1983, Ironies of automation, Automatica, 19, 775, 10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8 Walsh, 2013, Using Evernote as an electronic lab notebook in a translational science laboratory, J. Lab Autom., 18, 229, 10.1177/2211068212471834 S. Schemel, M. Carreau, J. DiMambro, G. Uerz, Future of Labs, T. Butler, S. Schemel, A. Nickl, J. Hargrave, M. Pearsall, A. Rabbets (Eds.), Arup, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/future-of-labs. (Accessed: November 4, 2021).