Revisiting Organisational Personality: Organisations as Functional and Metaphysical Entities
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armstrong, K The Battle for God: fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam London: HarperCollins 2001
Callow, S Every Man in his Humour The Guardian, 26/08/2006
Gellerman, S The Company Personality: what it is, how it got that way and what to do about it Management Review 48, March 1959
Harrison, R How to describe your organisation Harvard Business Review, Sept–Oct 1972
Handy, C Understanding Organisations 4th Edition, London: Penguin 1965
Trompenaars, F Riding the Waves of Culture Chicago: Irwin 1993
Schein, EH Organisational Culture and Leadership San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass 1985
Handy op. cit. p 184
Bridges, op. cit. p xii
Previously called Multiple Personality Disorder.
ibid. p xiii
Morgan, G Images of Organisation Updated Edn. London: Sage 2006
Mitroff, II Stakeholders of the Organisational Mind: toward a new view of organisational policy making San Francisco CA: Jossey Bass 1983
Morgan, G op. cit. p 231
ibid. p 6
Morgans book sets out to explore the most popular examples.
ibid. p 31
ibid p 40
Silverman D The Theory of Organisations London: Heinemann 1970, p 37
Weick K E Making Sense of the Organisation Oxford: Blackwell 2001
It is noteworthy that in recent years several management or organisational behaviour texts have apparently recoiled from the prescriptive approach, e.g. Rollinson (Organisational Behaviour and Analysis 4th Edn. Essex: 2008 p xvii) who ascribes it to ‘most American texts’. But many still assume that ‘the (aspiring) manager’ is the recipient of the textual advice.
Watson T Organising and Managing Work Harlow: FT Prentice Hall 2002 p 196
Danaher J The Laws of Thought The Philosopher Vol. LXXXXII No. 1
Armstrong, K The Battle for God: fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam London: HarperCollins 2001
Bly, R Iron John: a book about men Dorset, UK: Element Books 1991, p 107
Robjant, D Iris Murdoch’s Everyday ‘Metaphysical Entities’ Minerva Vol. 4 November 2000
ibid.
For example, Lund Dean and colleagues describe social science researchers ‘putting positivist methodological rigour before intellectual rigour’: Lund Dean, K, Fornaciari, CJ and McGee JJ Research in Spirituality, Religion and Work Journal of Organisational Change Management 16. 4. 2003 pp 378–395. Similarly, Morgan refers to the parallels drawn by economist Ely Devons between quantitative analysis and shamanism. Like the shaman, the magical analyst does not lose credibility when proved wrong — at least not until recent events in the banking industry (Morgan, op. cit. p 140).
Dinkelaker P and Fudjack J op. cit. INTJ is termed by David Keirsey the ‘mastermind’ temperament.
Goldthwait J T (trs) Kant: Reflections on the Beautiful and the Sublime Univ. California Press 2004
Rieu, EV (trs) Homer: The Odyssey. London: Penguin 1965. There is a hint of irony in the original as Menwas noted neither for brains nor looks.
Sappho Fragment 1: Hymn to Aphrodite
Steinbeck, J The Log from the Sea of Cortex London, Pan 1951/1990
Ash, R et al. Folklore, Myths and Legends of Britain London: Readers’ Digest 1973. ‘Navis’ in Latin is a feminine word, but it is not clear why ships have traditionally been regarded as feminine in many cultures. The Jungian might regard the sea as a feminine archetype, and suggest that the dangerous business of sea-faring, where rationality does not always provide protection, might connect sailors more closely with such unconscious universal symbols.
Fox, S Stradivari cello set to break hearts and records The Times 8/9/2008
Buchan, J Fullcircle In The Runagates Club Cornwall, UK: House of Stratus 2001
ibid. p 215
Sherwin BL Golems among Us Chicago: Ivan R Dee 2004 p 156
ibid. p 162f
Mickelthwait J and Wooldridge A The Company: a short history of a revolutionary idea London: Random House 2003 p 3
Bakan J The Corporation: the pathological pursuit of profit and power London: Constable 2006
Sherwin B op cit
Sherwin B op. cit. p 48f
Watson L Supernature: The Natural History of the Supernatural London: Hodder and Stoughton 1973
Sherwin B op. cit p 160 f
ibid. p 185
ibid. p 142
Morgan G op. cit.
Danaher J op. rit.
Whitaker, JD, King, R and Knott, D Sea Science: Jellyfish S Carolina Department of Natural Resources 2005/6
Holm, E What makes a Bee Colony function? Bees for Development Journal 67 Monmouth, UK 2006
Gabriel, Y Organisations in Depth London: Sage 1999 p 211
Sherwin B op. cit.
Krifka M Introduction to Semantics Austin: University of Texas 1999 p 3
al-Farabi: see Fremantle A (ed) The Age of Belief New York: Mentor Books 1954 ps. 116–117
Robjant, D op. cit.
Schiffer S Meaning Oxford: Clarendon 1972
Turner, S P The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1994
Gulick, W B ‘Prolegomena to a Polanyian Theory of Practice: a critique of Stephen Turner’s account’ Tradition and Discovery Polanyian Society Periodical 1998–1999 pp 6–11
Sheldrake R A New Science of Life: the Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance London: Park Street Press 1995
Hutton J Bazlegette J and Reed B ‘Organisation-in-the-Mind’ in Newman J Developing Organisational Consultancy London: Routledge 1997
Robjant, D op. cit.
Hutton J op. cit.
Hutton J op. cit. Sherwin B op. cit. p 193
The paraphrases are from an interview with Bronk on BBC Radio Start the Week. His book, The Romantic Economist, is to be published in February 2009.
Sherwin op. cit. p 4
Baddiel D Tribute to John Updike The Times 31/01/2009
Bly, R op. cit. p 108
Danaher J op. cit.