Revisão acetabular em artroplastia total de quadril com cunhas de tântalo associadas a enxerto ósseo bovino liofilizado

Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia - Tập 52 - Trang 46-51 - 2017
Cristiano Valter Diesel1, Tiango Aguiar Ribeiro2, Marcelo Reuwsaat Guimarães1, Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo3, Carlos Roberto Galia1,3
1Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Medicina ‐ Ciências Cirúrgicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
2Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Departamento de Cirurgia, Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (SOT‐HUSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil
3Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina (FAMED), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

Tài liệu tham khảo

Dixon, 2004, Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need, Ann Rheum Dis, 63, 825, 10.1136/ard.2003.012724 Von Roth, 2015, Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow‐up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 97, 284, 10.2106/JBJS.N.00798 Garbuz, 1996, Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft Study with a minimum five‐year follow‐up, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, 693, 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00008 Slooff, 1993, Cemented fixation with bone grafts, Orthop Clin North Am, 24, 667, 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31847-2 Levai, 1996, Acetabular reconstruction in total hip revision using a bone graft substitute. Early clinical and radiographic results, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 108, 10.1097/00003086-199609000-00013 Galia, 2015, Physicochemical characterization of lyophilized bovine bone grafts, Rev Bras Ortop, 46, 444, 10.1590/S0102-36162011000400017 Galia, 2008, In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bovine bone biocompatibility, Clinics (São Paulo), 63, 801, 10.1590/S1807-59322008000600016 Issack, 2013, Use of porous tantalum for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, 1981, 10.2106/JBJS.L.01313 Flecher, 2017, Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five‐year follow‐up of fifty one hips, Int Orthop, 41, 911, 10.1007/s00264-016-3312-2 Van Haaren, 2007, High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, 296, 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18080 García-Rey, 2015, THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, 3882, 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7 García-Cimbrelo, 2014, Bone defect determines acetabular revision surgery, Hip Int, 24, S33, 10.5301/hipint.5000162 Gehrke, 2013, Acetabular revision in THA using tantalum augments combined with impaction bone grafting, Hip Int, 23, 359, 10.5301/hipint.5000044 Learmonth, 2007, The operation of the century: total hip replacement, Lancet, 370, 1508, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 Del Gaizo, 2012, Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, 395, 10.1007/s11999-011-2170-x Flecher, 2010, Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 96, 235, 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.11.014 Ribeiro, 2015, Lyophilized xenograft: a case series of histological analysis of biopsies, Cell Tissue Bank, 16, 227, 10.1007/s10561-014-9470-9 Rosito, 2009, Mid‐term follow‐up of acetabular reconstruction using bovine freeze‐dried bone graft and reinforcement device, Rev Col Bras Cir, 36, 230, 10.1590/S0100-69912009000300009