Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach

Aldian, 2005, A consistent method to determine flexible criteria weights for multicriteria transport project evaluation in developing countries, J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 6, 3948

Bana, 2001, The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study, J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., 10, 111, 10.1002/mcda.292

Banville, 1998, A stakeholder approach to MCDA, Syst. Res., 15, 15, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::AID-SRES179>3.0.CO;2-B

Behzadian, 2010, PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 200, 198, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021

Békefi, 2003, Multicriteria analysis of the financial feasibility of transport infrastructure projects in Hungary, Infor, 41, 105

Bernardini A., Macharis C., 2011. The impact of the aviation sector on climate change – a multicriteria analysis of possible policy measures. Sostenibilità, qualità e sicurezza nei sistemi di trasporto e logistica.

Berrittella, 2007, An analytic hierarchy process for the evaluation of transport policies to reduce climate change impacts, Soc. Sci. Res. Netw., 12, 1

Bielli, 1996, Multicriteria evaluation model of public transport networks, 135, 10.1007/978-3-642-85256-5_7

Bose, 1997, Multi-attribute utility methods in group decision making: past applications and potential for inclusion in GDSS, Omega: Int. J. Manag. Sci., 25, 691, 10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00040-6

Brans, 1986, ‘How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method’, European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 228, 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5

Brans, 1982, ‘L'ingénierie de la décision. Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. Méthode PROMETHEE’, 183

Brey, 2007, Evaluation of automobiles with alternative fuels utilizing multicriteria techniques, J. Power Sources, 169, 213, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.052

Bristow, 2000, Transport project appraisal in the European Union, Transp. Policy, 7, 51, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00010-X

Browne, 2011, Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 31, 226, 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.11.001

Bruhn Barfod, 2012, An MCDA approach for the selection of bike projects based on structuring and appraising activities, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 218, 810, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.038

Cantarella, G.E., Vitetta. A., 1994, A multicriteria analysis for urban network design and parking location. In: TRISTAN II, Conference Proceedings Capri, pp. 839–852

Celik, 2009, Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 4541, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.033

Chen, 2008, A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport, Int. J. Manag. Sci., 36, 363

Cooper, 1989

Curciarello, 2002

De Brucker, 2013, Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: a stakeholder management approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 224, 122, 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021

De Brucker, 2011, Multi-criteria analysis in transport project evaluation: an institutional approach, Eur. Transp. Trasp. Eur., 47, 3

de Silva, 1996, An empirical procedure for enhancing the impact of road investments, Transp. Policy, 3, 210, 10.1016/S0967-070X(96)00019-4

Despontin, 1983, A user oriented listing of multiple criteria decision methods, Belgisch tijdschrift voor statistiek, informatica en operationeel onderzoek, 23, 1

DETR, 1998. A new deal for transport: better for everyone, Integrated Transport White Paper.

Filippo, 2007, A fuzzy mulit-criteria model applied to the management of the environmental restoration of paved highways, Transp. Res. D, 12, 423, 10.1016/j.trd.2007.05.004

Freeman, 1984

Freudensprung, P., Nijkamp, P., Simons, R.J., 1995. Bottlenecks in Trans-Alpine freight transport: a multicriteria analysis on future Brenner corridor alternatives, VU University Amsterdam, Serie Research Memoranda, 0008.

Gagatsi, E., Giannopoulos, G., Aifandopoulou, G., 2014. Supporting policy making in maritime transport by means of multi-actors multi-criteria analysis: a methodology developed for the greek maritime transport system, Transport Research Arena, Paris, April 14–17.

Gercek, 2004, A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul, Transportation, 31, 203, 10.1023/B:PORT.0000016572.41816.d2

Geudens, T., Macharis, C., De Brucker, K., Van Malderen, F., 2009. Multi-actor Multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a technique for the evaluation of traffic safety measures, in Macharis and Turcksin. Proceedings of the BIVEC-GIBET Transport Research Day Part I, pp. 943–957

Guitouni, 1998, Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 109, 501, 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00073-3

Hayashy, 2000, International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal, Transp. Policy, 7, 73, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00015-9

Hickman, 2012, Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA, Transp. Res. A, 46, 560

Hochmair Hartwig, H., 2008. Grouping of Optimized Pedestrian Routes for Multi-Modal Route Planning: A Comparison of Two Cities, in Lecture Notes in Geography and Cartography, The European Information Society, 339–358.

Hugonnard, 1983, Le plan d’extension du metro en banlieue parisienne: un cas type d’application de I’analyse multicritere

Iniestra, 2009, Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework, Appl. Soft Compu., 9, 512, 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.07.006

Jović Jadranka, 2001, Modal split modeling using multicriteria analysis and discrete fuzzy sets, Yugoslav J. Oper. Res., 11, 221

Janic, 2003, Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe, Transp. Plan. Technol., 26, 491, 10.1080/0308106032000167373

Jakimavicius, 2009, A GIS and multi-criteria-based analysis and ranking of transportation zones of Vilnius city. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Baltic J. Sustain., 15, 39

Keshkamat, 2009, The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project, Poland, J. Transp. Geogr., 17, 54, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.04.010

Klungboonkrong, 1997, Multicriteria environmental sensitivity evaluation of the urban road network: analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy compositional approach, Pap. Australas. Transp. Res. Forum, 21, 805

Kourtit, 2014, A multi-actor multi-criteria analysis of the performance of global cities, Appl. Geogr., 49, 24, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.006

Labbouz, 2008, Implementing a public transport line: multi-criteria decision-making methods that facilitate concertation, Oper. Res. Int. J., 8, 5, 10.1007/s12351-008-0003-9

Lee, 2000, Methods for evaluation of transportation projects in the USA, Transp. Policy, 7, 41, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00011-1

Lehuédé, 2014, A multi-criteria large neighbourhood search for the transportation of disabled people, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 65, 983, 10.1057/jors.2013.17

Leviäkangas, 2002, Profitability evaluation of intelligent transport system investments, J. Transp. Eng., 128, 276, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:3(276)

Leyva-López, 2003, A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 148, 14, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00273-4

Ludin, 2007, Using multi-criteria analysis to identify suitable light rail transit route, J. Alam Bina, 1, 131

Macharis, 2014, A stakeholder-based assessment framework applied to evaluate development scenarios for the spatial data infrastructure for Flanders, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 46, 45, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.04.001

Macharis, 2014, A stakeholder-based multicriteria evaluation framework for city distribution, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 11, 75, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.06.004

Macharis, C., Nijkamp, P., 2013a. Multi-actor and multi-criteria analysis in evaluating mega-projects. In: Priemus, H., Van Wee, B.(Eds.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, pp. 242–266.

Macharis, C., Nijkamp, P., 2013b. Stakeholder bias in multi-actor multi-criteria transportation evaluation: issues and solutions. In: Vanoutrive, T., Verhetsel, A. (Eds.), Smart Transport Networks – Market Structure, Sustainability and Decision Making, pp. 248–268.

Macharis, 2012, Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: state of use, Decis. Support Syst., 54, 610, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008

Macharis, 2011, Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A case study on night time delivery for urban distribution, 101

Macharis, 2010, The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics, Transp. Policy, 17, 303, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.02.004

Macharis, 2009, The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: theory and practice, J. Adv. Transp., 43, 183, 10.1002/atr.5670430206

Macharis, 2004, The strategic evaluation of new technologies through multicriteria analysis: the advisors case. Economic Impacts of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Innovations and Case Studies, Res. Transp. Econ., 8, 443, 10.1016/S0739-8859(04)08019-9

Macharis, 2004, The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport: The MAMCA methodology, Eur. Transp./ Transp. Europei, 114

Macharis, 2004, The strategic evaluation of new technologies through multi-criteria analysis: the advisors case, in Economic impacts of Intelligent Transport Systems

Macharis, 2004, PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 153, 307, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X

Macharis, 1998, The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure, J. Decis. Syst., 7, 283

Marschke, K., Ferreira, L., Bunker, J., 2005. Validating deployment guidelines for road-based intelligent transport systems (ITS) and traffic operation services. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the Australian Institutes of Transport Research, Melbourne, December 8–10.

Medda, 2003, A combinatorial assessment methodology for complex transport policy analysis, Integr. Assess., 4, 214, 10.1076/iaij.4.3.214.23773

Mousseau, 2001, Development of a decision aiding tool for the evolution of public transport ticket pricing in the Paris region, 213

Mousseau, V., Multiple Criteria Decision Aid Bibliography, LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, 〈http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/mcda/biblio/index.html〉, last updated: 01/11/2009, last accessed: August 2013.

Nakamura, 2000, The economic evaluation of transport infrastructure: needs for international comparisons, Transp. policy, 7, 3, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00008-1

Ondrus, J., Pigneur, Y., 2006. A multi-stakeholder multi-criteria assessment framework of mobile payments: an illustration with the Swiss public transportation industry. In: R. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Kauai.

Park, 2009, Evaluating competitiveness of air cargo express services, Transp. Res. E, 45, 321, 10.1016/j.tre.2008.09.004

Poh, 1999, Transportation fuels and policy for Singapore: an AHP planning approach, Comput. Ind. Eng., 37, 507, 10.1016/S0360-8352(00)00020-6

Priemus, H., and Van Wee, B 2013. International Handbook on Mega-Projects, (Eds.), ISBN:978.1.78100.2290.2

Quinet, 2000, Evaluation methodologies of transportation projects in France, Transp. Policy, 7, 27, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00014-7

Roy, 2013, Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method, EURO J. Decis. Processes, 1, 69, 10.1007/s40070-013-0004-7

Saaty, 1989

Saaty, 1988

Saito, 1987, Application of the analytic hierarchy method to setting priorities on bridge replacement projects, Transp. Res. Rec., 1124, 26

Sayers, 2003, Multi-criteria evaluation of transport options-flexible, transparent and user-friendly?, Transp. Policy, 10, 95, 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00049-5

Scannella, 2003, Valuation of road projects with uncertain outcomes, Transp. Reviews, 23, 35, 10.1080/01441640309896

Sharifi, M.A., Boerboom, L., Shamsudin, K.B., Veeramuthu, L., 2006. Spatial multiple criteria decision analysis in integrated planning for public transport and land use development study in Klang Valley Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Technical Commission II Symposium, Vienna, July 12–14, 85.

Seunglim, K., Seongkwan, M.L., 2006. AHP-based decesion-making process for construction of public transportion city model: case study of Jeju, Korea. In: Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montréal, Canada, June 14–16.

Stott, 2011, Automatic metro map layout using multicriteria optimization, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 17, 101, 10.1109/TVCG.2010.24

Tabucanon, 1995, Multiple criteria evaluation of transportation system improvement projects: the Case of Korea, J. Adv. Transp., 29, 127, 10.1002/atr.5670290110

Talvitie, 2000, Evaluation of road projects and programs in developing countries, Transp. Policy, 7, 61, 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00016-0

Tsamboulas, 2007, A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments, Transp. Policy, 14, 11, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.06.001

Tsamboulas, 2000, EFECT-evaluation framework of environmental impacts and costs of transport initiatives, Transp. Res. D, 5, 283, 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00038-3

Tsamboulas, 1999, Use of multicriteria methods for assessment of transport projects, J. Transp. Eng., 25, 404

Tudela, 2006, Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis. An application to urban transport investment, Transp. Res. A, 40, 414

Turcksin, 2011, A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet, 26th Mini-EURO conference on Intelligent Decision Making in Transportation/Logistics New Trends and Directions, Procedia - Soc, Behav. Sci., 20, 945

Tuzkaya, 2009, Evaluating the environmental effects of transportation modes using an integrated methodology and an application, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 6, 277, 10.1007/BF03327632

Tzeng, 2005, Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation, Energy Policy, 33, 1373, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014

Tzeng, 1993, Application of multicriteria decision making to old vehicle elimination in Taiwan, Energy Environ., 4, 268, 10.1177/0958305X9300400304

Vaidya, 2006, Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 169, 1, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028

Vanoutrive, 2013

Vargas, 1990, An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48, 2, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H

Vermote, 2014, Traffic-restriction in Ramallah (Palestine): participatory sustainability assessment of pedestrian scenarios using a simplified transport model, Land Use Policy, 41, 453, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.005

Vermote, 2013, A road network for freight transport in flanders: multi-actor multi-criteria assessment of alternative ring ways, Sustainability, 5, 4222, 10.3390/su5104222

Vincke, 1992

Vincke, 1985, A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM, Manag. Sci., 31, 641

Walker, 2000, Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector, J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., 9, 11, 10.1002/1099-1360(200001/05)9:1/3<11::AID-MCDA264>3.0.CO;2-3

Wey, 2007, Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation, Math. Comput. Model., 46, 985, 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.017

Wiethoff, 2012, A methodology for improving road safety by novel infrastructural and invehicle technology combinations, Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 4, 67, 10.1007/s12544-011-0065-2

Winebrake, 2003, The future of hydrogen fueling systems for transportation: an application of perspective based scenario analysis using the analytical hierarchy process, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 70, 359, 10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00189-5

Yedla, 2003, Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi, Transp. Res. A, 37, 717

Yoe, 2002

Zhicai, 2006, Socio-economic impact assessment of intelligent transport systems, Tsinghua Sci. Technol., 11, 340

Zografos, K.G., Androutsopoulos, K.N., 2001. Assessing the Impacts from the Introduction of Advanced Transport Telematics Technologies in Hazardous Materials Fleet Management. In: Proceedings of the 80th Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., USA.