Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education

Alamäki, A. (1999). How to educate students for a technological future: Technology education in early childhood and primary education. Dissertation, University of Turku, Turku.

Boekaerts, M., & Boscolo, P. (2002). Interest in learning, learning to be interested. Learning and Instruction, 12, 375–382.

Boser, R., Palmer, J., & Daugherty, M. (1998). Students attitudes toward technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4–19.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2004). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Portland.

Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2006). Elementary teachers’ understanding of engineering and technology. In Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago.

Davies, T. (2000). Confidence! Its role in the creativity teaching and learning of design and technology. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 18–31.

Davis, E. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analysing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34, 21–53.

Davis, R., Ginns, I., & McRobbie, C. (2002). Elementary school students’ understanding of technology concepts. Journal of Technology Education, 14(1), 35–50.

De Klerk Wolters, F. (1989). A PATT study among 10 to 12-year-olds. In F. De Klerk Wolters, I. Mottier, J. Raat, & M. De Vries (Eds.), Teacher education for school technology. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.

De Vries, M. (2000). Can we train researchers and teachers to make a team? Win-win strategies in technology education. In First Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research Proceedings, Griffith University, Brisbane, pp. 1–12.

Fox-Turnbull, W. (2006). The influences of teacher knowledge and authentic formative assessment on student learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 53–77.

Garmire, E., & Pearson, G. (Eds.). (2006). Tech Tally. Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

ITEA (2006). Technological literacy for all. A rationale and structure for the study of technology, 2nd edn. International Technology Education Association, Reston.

ITEA (2007). Standards for technological literacy. Content for the study of technology, 3rd edn. International Technology Education Association, Reston.

Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1996a). Perceptions about technology held by primary teachers in England. Research in Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 43–54.

Jarvis, T., & Rennie, L. (1996b). Understanding technology: The development of a concept. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 977–992.

Johnston, J., & Ahtee, M. (2006). Comparing primary student teachers’ attitudes, subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge needs in a physics activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 503–512.

Jones, A., & Compton, V. (1998). Towards a model for teacher development in technology education: From research to practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 51–65.

Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 121–140.

Jones, A., Harlow, A., & Cowie, B. (2004). New Zealand teachers’ experiences in implementing the technology curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 101–119.

Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education: Some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 41–56.

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge, The construct and its implications for science education (Vol. 6., pp. 95–132). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

McRobbie, C., Ginns, I., & Stein, S. (2000). Preservice primary teachers’ thinking about technology and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 81–101.

Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 283–305.

OECD (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Global Science Forum, Paris.

Parkinson, E. (2001). Teacher knowledge and understanding of design and technology for children in the 3–11 age group: A study focusing on aspects of structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 13, 44–58.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

Smith, D. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education, Science and Technology Education Library, Vol. 6. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Stables, K. (1997). Critical issues to consider when introducing technology education into the curriculum of young learners. Journal of Technology Education, 8(2)

Stein, S., McRobbie, C., & Ginns, I. (2002). Implications of missed opportunities for learning and assessment in design and technology education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 35–49.

Twyford, J., & Järvinen, E. M. (2000). The formation of children’s technology concepts: A study of what it means to do technology from a child’s perspective. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 32–48.

Van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.

Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441–461.

Volk, K., Yip, W., & Lo, T. (2003). Hong Kong pupils’ attitudes toward technology: The impact of design and technology programs. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 48–63.

Weber, K., & Custer, R. (2005). Gender-based preferences toward technology education content, activities, and instructional methods. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 55–71.

Wilson, V., & Harris, M. (2003). Designing the best: A review of effective teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 223–241.

Wilson, V., & Harris, M. (2004). Creating change? A review of the impact of design and technology in schools in England. Journal of Technology Education, 15(2), 46–65.