Review of quantitative and qualitative studies on U.S. public perceptions of synthetic biology

Bauer MW, Allum NC, Miller S (2007) What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Underst Sci 16: 79–95. http://pus.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/16/1/79

Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture. University of California Press, Berkeley

Gaskell G et al (2004) GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk anal 24: 185–194. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ebene5/HT_1242.pdf

Hart Research Associates (2008) Awareness of and attitudes toward nanotechnology and synthetic biology. http://www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/6019/hart_final_re8706b.pdf

Kahan DM et al (2008a) Biased assimilation, polarization and cultural credibility: an experimental study of nanotechnology risk perceptions. PEN Brief N. 3 (Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, 2008). http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/5960/brief2kahan_final.pdf

Kahan DM et al (2008b) The cultural cognition of synthetic biology risk perceptions: a preliminary analysis. GWU Legal Studies Research Paper N. 446. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1264804

Kahan DM et al (2009) Risk and culture: is synthetic biology different? Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 09-2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1347165

Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15:221–241

Pauwels E, Ifrim I (2008) Trends in American and European press coverage of synthetic biology: tracking the last five years of coverage. Synbio 1 (Synthetic Biology Project, 2008). http://www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/5999/synbio1final.pdf

Scheufele DA et al (2008) Religious beliefs and public attitudes towards nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 361:1–4