Review article: is non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease a spectrum, or are steatosis and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis distinct conditions?

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics - Tập 36 Số 9 - Trang 815-823 - 2012
Yusuf Yılmaz1,2
1Department of Gastroenterology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey
2Institute of Gastroenterology, Marmara University, Maltepe, Istanbul, Turkey

Tóm tắt

SummaryBackgroundNon‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently conceptualised as a clinical spectrum that results from a ‘multiple‐hit’ process which begins with simple steatosis and subsequently renders the hepatocytes susceptible to a variety of insults. Ultimately, more serious liver injuries like non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis may develop. Although the metabolic syndrome is considered the crucial player in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, recent studies have highlighted novel pathophysiological mechanisms in this clinical entity.AimTo discuss the pathophysiology of NAFLD based on the hypothesis that simple steatosis and NASH are discrete entities rather than two points on a spectrum.MethodsA literature search was conducted in August 2012 on PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline and Scopus using the following search terms: steatosis, non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, pathophysiology, fatty liver, natural history and genetics.ResultsSimple steatosis and NASH appear as two distinct pathophysiological entities and progression from pure fatty liver to NASH appears to be so rare as to warrant publication. The possible pathogenetic pathways specifically related to NASH are highlighted.ConclusionsAlthough simple steatosis and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis are currently viewed as two histological subtypes of the unique spectrum of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, the two conditions are likely distinct not only from a histological but also from a pathophysiological standpoint. Efforts to distinguish simple steatosis from non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis using non‐invasive modalities should be informed by the current pathophysiology of these two clinical entities.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03246.x

10.1016/j.cld.2010.07.006

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03752.x

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02600.x

10.1016/j.bpg.2010.08.005

10.1586/egh.11.19

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x

10.7861/clinmedicine.11-2-176

10.3748/wjg.v17.i29.3377

10.1586/egh.10.56

10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824587e0

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04556.x

10.1002/hep.24376

10.1097/00125480-200201000-00005

10.1007/s00428-003-0943-7

10.1016/j.cld.2004.04.013

10.1097/00042737-200410000-00015

10.1177/0884533611419668

10.1055/s-0032-1306421

10.1136/gut.2010.218214

10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5286

10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70599-2

10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04145.x

10.1016/j.jhep.2005.09.002

10.1002/hep.24001

10.1016/j.gcb.2010.06.004

10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07659.x

10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07667.x

10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.014

10.3109/07853890.2010.518623

10.1016/j.gastrohep.2011.08.002

10.1007/s00109-011-0803-x

10.1055/s-0031-1276643

10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00315-0

10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04667.x

10.1002/hep.24283

10.1002/hep.23759

10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02526.x

10.1194/jlr.P900013-JLR200

10.1186/1471-2350-11-172

10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.034

10.1038/ng.257

10.1530/eje.1.02229

10.1007/s00125-009-1285-z

10.2337/diabetes.55.03.06.db05-1075

10.1371/journal.pone.0038322

10.1136/gut.2006.093336

10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06001.x

10.3748/wjg.v16.i37.4652

Copaci I, 2006, The role of cytokines in non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis. A review, J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 15, 363

10.4161/cc.6.17.4644

10.1038/nri2151

10.1016/j.molimm.2004.04.017

10.1016/B978-0-12-394622-5.00001-8

10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.051

10.1159/000282092

10.1002/cbf.1774

10.1016/j.cld.2012.05.002

10.1002/hep.25559

10.1002/path.2888

10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301857

10.1002/hep.23998

10.1002/hep.25903

10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02609.x

10.1016/j.cld.2010.08.003

10.1016/S1084952102001258

10.1002/hep.25742

10.1042/BC20080105

10.4103/1319-3767.61244

10.1016/j.cld.2012.05.001

10.1016/j.gcb.2009.08.001

10.1055/s-0032-1306422

10.1124/pr.108.00001

10.1097/MPG.0b013e31822578db

10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.003

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02682.x

10.1016/j.jacl.2011.06.013

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02601.x

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02751.x

10.1371/journal.pone.0024363

10.1002/hep.22429

10.3748/wjg.15.1863

10.1002/hep.22691

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04148.x

10.1002/hep.23727

10.1002/hep.23623

10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02451.x

10.2174/156652410790963321

10.3748/wjg.15.4387