Reversion of flowering
Tóm tắt
Reversion from floral to vegetative growth is under environmental control in many plant species. However the factors regulating floral reversion, and the events at the shoot apex that take place when it occurs, have received less attention than those associated with the transition to flowering. Reversions may be categorized as flower reversion, in which the flower meristem resumes leaf production, or inflorescence reversions, in which the meristem ceases to initiate bracts with flowers in their axils and begins instead to make leaves with vegetative branches in their axils. Related to these two types of reversion, but distinct from them, are examples of partial flowering, when non-floral meristems grow out so that the plant begins to grow vegetatively again. Anomalous or proliferous flowers may form as a result of unfavourable growth conditions or viral infection, but these do not necessarily involve flower reversions. There are many examples of inflorescence reversion but fewer clearly defined cases of flower reversion. In flower reversion the meristem of the flower itself reverts to vegetative growth so that flowers with basal floral organs and distal leaves on the same axis are formed successively by the apical meristem. InPharbitis nil, Anagallis arvensis, andImpatiens balsamina flower reversions have been caused by defined environmental conditions. However, only inImpatiens has detailed study of the changes in growth and development at the shoot apex during reversion been carried out. These studies show that changes in apical growth and phyllotaxis that typically accompany flowering can be separated from the development of floral organs and suggest that the floral stimulus plays a role throughout flower morphogenesis. The occurrence of reverting organs intermediate between leaves and petals is of particular interest in allowing experiments to be done on the progress of determination at the cell, tissue and organ levels. Reversion indicates that the flowering process must be regarded as a continuum, with physiological stages such as commitment to flower, and even morphological stages such as different floral organ types, being to varying extents artificial. Further study of the regulation of floral morphogenesis, and of the events associated with reversion, may provide important information on the nature of the factors that bring about the onset of flowering itself.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arber, A. 1934. The Gramineae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arnal, C. 1966. Réversions de l’inflorescence terminale deSinapis alba L. provoquées par divers régimes photoperiodiques. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,262: 1077–1080.
Bagnard, C. 1980a. Floraison et réversion chezSinapis alba. I. Utilisation, pour l’étude de la mise à fleurs, du delai de floraison et du nombre de feuilles de l’axe principal et des axes latéraux. Canad. J. Bot.58: 1138–1143.
—. 1980b. Floraison et réversion chezSinapis alba. IL Caractères morphologiques de plantes porteuses de réversions. Canad. J. Bot.58: 2335–2342.
—. 1983. Floraison et réversion chezSinapis alba. III. Effects immédiats et différés de divers régimes d’éclairement appliqués pendant la phase post-inductrice. Canad. J. Bot.61: 3386–3392.
—,G. Bernier &C. Arnal. 1972. Étude physiologique et histologique de la réversion de l’inflorescence chezSinapis alba L. Physiol. Vég.10: 237–254.
Ballard, L. A. T. 1969.Anagallis arvensis L. Pages 376–392in L. T. Evans (ed.), The induction of flowering: Some case histories. MacMillan of Australia, Melbourne.
Bartholomew, D. P. 1977. Inflorescence development of pineapple (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.) induced to flower with ethephon. Bot. Gaz.138: 312–320.
—. 1985.Ananas comosus. Pages 450–454in A. H. Halevy (ed.), Handbook of flowering. Vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Battey, N. H. 1985. Growth and development at the shoot apex ofImpatiens balsamina L. during flowering and reversion. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
— &R. F. Lyndon 1984. Changes in apical growth and phyllotaxis on flowering and reversion inImpatiens balsamina L. Ann. Bot.54: 553–567.
——. 1986. Apical growth and modification of the development of primordia during re-flowering of reverted plantsof Impatiens balsamina L. Ann. Bot.58: 333–341.
——. 1988. Determination and differentiation of leaf and petal primordia inImpatiens balsamina L. Ann. Bot.61: 9–16.
Bernier, G. 1966. The morphogenetic role of the apical meristem in higher plants. Les Congrès et Colloques de l’Université de Liège38: 151–211.
— &M. T. Dath. 1962. A propos de quelques cas d’apparition de fleurs le long d’entrenceuds végétatifs ou de feuilles le long de l’inflorescence chezSinapis alba L. Rév. Cytol. Biol. Vég.25: 241–252.
—,J-M. Kinet &R. M. Sachs. 1981. The physiology of flowering. Vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Biddulph, O. 1935. Histological variations inCosmos in relation to photoperiodism. Bot. Gaz.97: 139–155.
Bismuth, F., &C. Larrieu. 1978. Étude de l’influence de l’acide gibberellique (GA3) et de l’acide n-dimethylamino-succinamique (B9) sur la croissance et la floraison de laScrophularia vernalis L. Biol. Pl.20: 335–343.
Blake, J. 1962. Normal and abnormal development of the stem apex in carnation. Ann. Bot.26: 95–104.
Borthwick, H. A. &M. M. Parker. 1938. Photoperiodic induction in Biloxi soybeans. Bot. Gaz.100: 374–377.
Brulfert, J. 1965. Étude expérimentale du développement végétatif et floral chezAnagallis arvensis L., ssp.phoenicea Scop. Formation de fleurs prolifères chez cette même espèce. Rev. Gén. Bot.72: 641–694.
— &P. Chouard. 1961. Nouvelles observations sur la production expérimentale de fleurs prolifères chezAnagallis arvensis L. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,253: 179–181.
— &D. Fontaine. 1967. Utilisation de la technique de culturein vitro pour une étude du développement floral chezAnagallis arvensis L. ssp.phoenicea Scop. Biol. Pl.9: 439–446.
Choshi, A. 1968. New observations on the prolification inSalvia. Rep. Fac. Sci. Shizuoka Univ.3: 27–34.
Chouard, P. 1950a. Induction réversible de morphoses foliaires opposées et de la mise à fleur chez deux Scabieuses par le photopériodisme. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,230: 119–121.
—. 1950b. Réversibilité de l’état végétatif sous l’effet du photopériodisme. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,231: 1245–1247.
Cordero, R. E., J. R. Murray &W. P. Hackett. 1985. Plastochron indices for juvenile and mature forms ofHederahelix L. (Araliaceae). Amer. J. Bot.72: 324–327.
Crawford, R. M. M. 1961. The photoperiodic reaction in relation to development inSalvia splendens. Ann. Bot.25: 78–84.
Dale, J. E. &F. L. Milthorpe. 1983. General features of the production and growth of leaves. Pages 151–178in J. E. Dale & F. L. Milthorpe (eds.), The growth and functioning of leaves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Daniels, M. J. 1979. The pathogenicity of mycoplasmas in plants. Zent. Bakteriol. Parasit. Infeckt. Hygiene (Abt. I)245: 184–199.
Debraux, G. &L. Simon. 1967. Influence de la lumière sur la biologie florale del’Impatiens balsamina L. variété Buisson fleuri. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Soc. Biol.161: 2267–2269.
——. 1969a. Induction expérimentale de fleurs prolifères chez l’Impatiensbalsamina variété Buisson fleuri par perturbation de la photopériode. Canad. J. Bot.47:1791–1802.
-& -. 1969b. Experimental induction of proliferous flowers inImpatiens balsamina L. by disturbances in the photoperiod. Mem. Soc. Bot. (France). Pp. 207–208.
Diomaiuto-Bonnand, J. 1969. Réversions de l’état inflorescential a l’état végétatif, chez leNicotiana glutinosa L., sous l’action d’éclairements de faible intensité. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,268: 51–54.
—. 1970. Réversions spontanées de l’état reproducteur à l’état végétatif, chez le Giroflée (Cheiranthus cheiri L.). Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,271: 45–48.
—. 1972. Réversions de l’état reproducteur à l’état végétatif, chez le Giroflée (Cheiranthus cheiri L.), sous l’action de temperatures moyennes ou elevées. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,274: 372–5.
—. 1975. Évolution du méristème apical de la Giroflée (Cheiranthus cheiri L.) soumise à des temperatures favourables puis défavourables au fonctionnement reproducteur: étude des réversions à l’état végétatif. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,280: 1365–1368.
—. 1976. La grappe de la Giroflée (Cheiranthus cheiri): recherches ontogénétiques sur la formation et l’avortement de ses bractées. Étude de leur développement obtenu expérimentalement. Comp. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,282: 1511–1514.
Emino, E. R. 1966. Shoot apex development in the carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.89: 615–619.
Evans, L. T. 1960. The influence of environmental conditions on inflorescence development in some long-day grasses. New Phytol.59: 163–174.
—. 1971. Flower induction and the florigen concept. Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol.22: 365–394.
Fischer, J. E. 1972. The transformation of stamens and of ovaries to inflorescences inT. aestivum L. under SD treatment. Bot. Gaz.133: 78–85.
Fontaine, D. 1972a. Diagnostic morphologique du stade de développement, au cours du plastochrone, du point végétatif de l’Anagallisarvensis L., plante à feuilles opposées et décussés. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,274: 58–61.
—. 1972b. Incidence du stade de développement du point végétatif de l’Anagallisarvensis L. au cours du plastochrone, sur la mise à fleurs de plantes soumises a des conditionslimités d’induction. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,274: 2984–2987.
Fujita, T. 1962. White clover with malformed inflorescences. J. Japanese Bot.37: 314–320.
Galinat, W. C. &A. W. Naylor. 1951. Relation of photoperiod to inflorescence proliferation inZea mays L. Amer. J. Bot.38: 38–47.
Gifford, E. M. 1969. Initiation and early development of the inflorescence in pineapple (Ananas comosus ‘Smooth Cayenne’) treated with acetylene. Amer. J. Bot.56: 892–897.
Greulach, V. A. 1942. Photoperiodic after-effects in six composites. Bot. Gaz.103: 698–709.
Gunckel, J. E. 1965. Factors effecting the morphogenesis of plant organs. Pages 251–268in P. R. White & A. R. Grove (eds.), International Conference on Plant Tissue Culture. McCutchan Publishing Corporation, Berkeley, California.
Harder, R. 1948. Vegetative and reproductive development ofKalanchoe blossfeldiana as influenced by photoperiodism. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.2: 117–138.
Haupt, W. 1969.Pisum sativum L. Pages 393–408in L. T. Evans (ed.), The induction of flowering: Some case histories. MacMillan of Australia, Melbourne.
Havelange, A., &G. Bernier. 1983. Partial floral evocation by high irradiance in the longday plantSinapis alba. Physiol. Pl.59: 545–550.
—,M. Bodson &G. Bernier. 1986. Partial floral evocation by exogenous cytokinin in the long-day plantSinapis alba. Physiol. Pl.67: 695–701.
Hegi, G. 1961. Flora Mittel-Europa. Part IV/2A, p. 429. Carl Hauser, München.
Heslop-Harrison, J. 1964. Sex expression in higher plants. Brookhaven Symp. Biol.16:109–125.
Jacobs, W. P. &V. Raghavan. 1962. Studies on floral histogenesis and physiology ofPerilla-I. Quantitative analysis of flowering inP.frutescens (L.) Britt. Phytomorphology12: 144–167.
Kasperbauer, M. T., R. P. Gardner &W. E. Loomis. 1962. Interaction of photoperiod and vernalisation in flowering of sweet clover (Melilotus). Pl. Physiol.37: 165–170.
Kerns, K. R., J. L. Collins &H. Kim. 1936. Developmental studies of the pineappleAnanas comosus (L) Merr. I. Origin and growth of leaves and inflorescence. New Phytol.35: 305–317.
King, R. W. 1983. The shoot apex in transition: flowers and other organs. Pages 109–144in J. E. Dale & F. L. Milthorpe (eds.), The growth and functioning of leaves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
— &L. T. Evans. 1969. Timing of evocation and development of flowers inPharbitis nil. Austral. J. Biol. Sci.22: 559–572.
Klebs, G. 1918. Über die Blütenbildung von Sempervivum. Flora111: 128–151.
Krishnamoorthy, H. N. &K. K. Nanda. 1967. Effect of intercalated long days and light interruption of dark period on flowering, extension growth and senescence ofImpatiens balsamina L. Physiol. Pl.20: 760–770.
——. 1968. Floral bud reversion inImpatiens balsamina under non-inductive photoperiods. Planta80: 43–51.
Kunkel, L. 1953. Virus-induced abnormalities. Brookhaven Symp. Biol.6: 157–173.
Lance, A. &P. Rondet. 1958. Sur les differents types de rosettes produites parBeta vulgaris L. (variété Ceres sucrière). Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,246:3496–3499.
Lang, A. 1965. Physiology of flower initiation. Pages 1380–1536in W. Ruhland (ed.), Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Vol. XV/I. Springer, Berlin.
Langer, R. H. M. &G. J. A. Ryle. 1958. Vegetative proliferations in herbage grasses. J. Brit. Grassland Soc.13: 29–33.
Lord, E. M. &K. J. Eckard. 1987. Shoot development inCitrus sinensis L. (Washington Naval orange). II. Alteration of developmental fate of flowering shoots after GA3 treatment. Bot. Gaz.148: 17–22.
Lyndon, R. F. 1979a. Rates of growth and primordial initiation during flower development inSilene at different temperatures. Ann. Bot.43: 539–551.
—. 1979b. A modification of flowering and phyllotaxis inSilene. Ann. Bot.43: 553–558.
—. 1987. Initiation and growth of internodes and stem and flower frusta inSilene coelirosa. Pages 301–314in J. G. Atherton (ed.), The manipulation of flowering. Butterworths, London.
— &N. H. Battey. 1985. The growth of the shoot apical meristem during flower initiation. Biol. Pl.27: 339–349.
Margara, J. 1960. Recherches sur le déterminisme de l’élongation et de la floraison dans le genreBeta. Ann. Amélior. Pl.10: 361–471.
Masters, M. T. 1869. Vegetable teratology: An account of the principal deviations from the usual constructions of plants. Robert Hardwicke for the Ray Society, London.
McHughen, A. 1977. Development of tobacco petalsin vitro. Ann. Bot.41: 1073–1076.
Meyer, V. G. 1966. Rower abnormalities. Bot. Rev.32: 165–218.
Mitra, S. N. 1967. Morphogenesis in chrysanthemums and blackcurrants in relation to factors influencing growth and flowering. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of London, London.
Mohan Ram, H. Y. &M. Wadhi. 1968. Morphogenetic potentialities of flower buds ofKalanchoe pinnata Pers. grownin vitro. Ann. Bot.32: 825–832.
Murneek, A. E. 1940. Length of day and temperature effects inRudbeckia. Bot. Gaz.102:269–279.
Nanda, K. K., &H. N. Krishnamoorthy. 1967. Photoperiodic studies on growth and development ofImpatiens balsamina L. II. Floral bud initiation, flower opening and extension growth. Planta72: 338–343.
——,T. A. Anuradha &K. Lal. 1967. Floral induction by gibberellic acid inImpatiens balsamina L., a qualitative short day plant. Planta76: 367–370.
Nitsch, C. &J. P. Nitsch. 1967. The induction of floweringin vitro in stem segments ofPlumbago indica L. Planta72: 371–384.
Nougarède, A. 1967. Experimental cytology of the shoot apical cells during vegetative growth and flowering. Intern. Rev. Cytol.21: 203–351.
Nwoke, F. I. O. 1980. Effects of number of photoperiodic cycles on induction and development of flowers and fruits inCorchorus olitorius L. (var.oniyaya Epen.). Ann. Bot.45: 569–576.
Parmentier, A. & J-M. Kinet. 1980. Effet de quelques traitements photopériodiques sur l’initiation et le développement du capitule de chrysanthème. Révue de l’Agriculture. Pp. 133–141.
Reynolds, J. &J. Tampion. 1983. Double flowers: A scientific study. Polytechnic of Central London Press, London.
Robbins, W. J. 1960. Further observations on juvenile and adultHedera. Amer. J. Bot.47:485–491.
Rogler, C. E. &W. P. Hackett. 1975. Phase change inHedera helix: Induction of the mature to juvenile phase change by gibberellin A3. Physiol. Pl.34: 141–147.
Sachs, T. 1969. Regeneration experiments on the determination of form of leaves. Israel J.Bot.18: 21–30.
Sarma, K. S. &A. B. Vora. 1985. Spike initiation inPlantago ovata Forssk. Ann. Bot.55: 263–265.
Schwabe, W. W. 1951. Factors controlling flowering in theChrysanthemum II. Day-length effects on the further development of inflorescence buds and their experimental reversal and modification. J. Exp. Bot.2: 223–227.
Seidlová, F. &J. Juráková-Štichová. 1965. The anatomy of shoot apex ofHyoscyamus niger L. reversed from the generative to the vegetative state. Biol. Pl.7: 376–379.
— &J. Opatrna. 1978. Change of growth correlations in the shoot meristem as the cause of age dependence of flowering inChenopodium rubrum. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.89: 377–392.
Simon, L. 1972. Structure et évolution du méristème apical de l’Impatiens balsamina L. variété Buisson Fleuri, au cours du développement. Comp. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,274: 1489–1492.
—. 1973. L’Impatiensbalsamina L. cultivar‘Buisson Fleuri’. Morphogénèse et ontogénèse expérimentales. D. ès Sc. Thesis. University of Nantes, Nantes.
—. 1974. Étapes morphogénétiques de la mise à fleur chez l’Impatiens balsamina L. cultivar ‘Buisson Fleuri’. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D,278:45–48.
Snow, M. &R. Snow. 1933. Experiments on phyllotaxis. II. The effect of displacing a primordium. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. (London) B,222: 353–400.
Stein, O. L. &E. B. Fosket. 1969. Comparative developmental anatomy of shoots of juvenile and adultHedera helix. Amer. J. Bot.56: 546–561.
Stokes, P. &K. Verkerk. 1951. Flower formation in brussels sprouts. Med. Landbouw. Wageningen50: 141–160.
Thomas, R. G. 1961. The relationship between leaf growth and the induction of flowering in long-day plants (LDP). Naturwissenschaften48: 108.
—. 1962. The initiation and growth of axillary bud primordia in relation to flowering inTrifolium repens L. Ann. Bot.26: 329–344.
— &B. J. Forde. 1967. Flowering inLotus pedunculatus Cav. 2. Minimal photoperiodic requirement for inflorescence initiation and development. New Zealand. J. Bot.5: 241–254.
Thompson, P. A. 1963. Reversal of photoperiodic induction of strawberries with maleic hydrazide. Nature200: 146–148.
Tran Thanh Van, M. 1965. La vernalisation duGeum urbanum L. Étude expérimentale de la mise en fleur chez une plante vivace en rosette exigeant le froid vernalisant pour fleurir. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.)6: 373–594.
—. 1981. Control of morphogenesis inin vitro cultures. Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol.32:291–311.
—,P. Toubart, A. Cousson, A. G. Darvill, D. J. Gollin, P. Chelf &P. Albersheim. 1985. Manipulation of the morphogenetic pathways of tobacco expiants by oligosaccharins. Nature314: 615–617.
Van de Pol, P. A. 1972. Floral induction, floral hormones and flowering. Med. Landbouw. Wageningen72: 1–89.
Vaughan, J. G. 1955. Morphology and growth of vegetative and reproductive apices ofArabidopsis thaliana, Capsella bursa-pastoris andAnagallis arvensis. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. London55: 279–301.
Wada, K. 1968. Studies on the flower initiation inPharbitis seedlings II. Influences of gammaray irradiation. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)81: 198–209.
Wee, Y. C. &A. N. Rao. 1979. Development of the inflorescence and “crown” ofAnanas comosus after treatment with acetylene, NAA and Ethephon. Amer. J. Bot.66: 351–360.
Wycherly, P. R. 1952. Temperature and photoperiod in relation to flowering in three perennial grass species. Med. Landbouw. Wageningen52: 75–92.
—. 1954. Vegetative proliferation of floral spikelets in British grasses. Ann. Bot.18:119–127.
Zeevaart, J. A. D. 1958. Flower formation as studied by grafting. Med. Landbouw. Wageningen58: 1–88.
—. 1969.Perilla. Pages 116–155in L. T. Evans (ed.), The induction of flowering: Some case histories. MacMillan of Australia, Melbourne.